データ・AIのスキル

Hook recipes and working examples — plugin hooks, frontmatter hooks in skills/agents/commands, prompt-based LLM hooks, and complete code examples in Python and Node.js. Use when building hook scripts, integrating hooks into plugins, implementing prompt-based hooks, or looking for hook configuration patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code session log schema — JSONL record types, message structure, tool call/result pairing, subagent file locations, team session layout, task/plan/team configuration paths. Use when parsing ~/.claude/projects/**/*.jsonl files, writing PostToolUse hooks that measure response sizes, building session analyzers, or any agent that reads or queries Claude session transcripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that changed components are actually connected into the intended end-to-end system flow. Use when checking imports/exports, registrations, data/control flow, configuration consumption, call paths, and boundary compatibility after implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting, stopping, or checking the dot-dash live session dashboard — a real-time browser UI that monitors all active Claude Code sessions, streams transcripts, and supports prompt injection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When calling LLM APIs from Python code. When connecting to llamafile or local LLM servers. When switching between OpenAI/Anthropic/local providers. When implementing retry/fallback logic for LLM calls. When code imports litellm or uses completion() patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate parallel agent dispatch as a manager — not a micromanager. Use when coordinating 2+ independent workers, running SAM task waves, relaying discoveries between worker waves, handling blockers, or synthesizing results. Covers both SAM structured dispatch (the task does the work) and ad-hoc dispatch (reference agent-orchestration for prompt template).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose substantive work into phases, dispatch each phase to a sub-agent, and adjudicate what comes back. Use whenever a request asks for implementation, investigation, a fix, a review, or any change to files — including small ones — and whenever you are about to read source or run a diagnostic yourself instead of handing it off. Also use when a report from a sub-agent needs judging, when a phase needs re-dispatching, or when a user names one instance of a pattern. Does not apply when your own prompt begins "Your ROLE_TYPE is sub-agent." — then follow references/sub-agent-contract.md instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or when users request help with ideation, marketing, and strategic planning. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation using research-validated prompt patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exploring unknown structured data files with dasel v3 — discover schema, list keys, find nested values, sample arrays, identify data types across JSON, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV, HCL, INI formats

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting specific data points from large agent output transcripts, kaizen analysis reports, or JSONL session files — tool timings, query counts, error summaries, or any structured facts — without loading raw data into orchestrator context. Activates when the orchestrator needs targeted facts from large files and context pollution must be avoided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying, converting, or transforming structured data with dasel v3 — in-place mutations, format conversion, batch operations, array manipulation, object construction, and merge patterns across JSON, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV, HCL, INI

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains Chain of Verification (CoVe) prompt design — a 4-step pattern separating generation from independent factual verification. Use when designing prompts that require factual accuracy, reducing hallucinations, checking technical standards or APIs, or producing step-by-step procedures where subtle errors are costly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform transcript analysis findings into actionable improvements. Triggers on "generate hooks from findings", "improve agent", "fix anti-pattern", "kaizen improvement", "generate hook proposals", or "create improvement plan". Provides templates for hook generation, agent prompt refinement, skill patches, CLAUDE.md updates, and script automation from analysis data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a user from one rough content idea to a finished post, platform-adapted variants, and repurposed follow-on assets using a 7-step sequential prompting workflow. Use when the user wants to turn a half-formed idea, frustration, story, or client situation into publishable content quickly and consistently — covering idea extraction, hook generation, outline, draft, humanizer pass, platform adaptation (LinkedIn, Reddit, X/Twitter, newsletter, Telegram), and repurpose engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up LLM-based text classification as a validated measurement design. Covers codebook construction, learning-regime and model choice, prompt construction, validation against human coding with kappa and F1, hybrid human-LLM review, downstream measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline for repeated free text against a closed codebook. Use when the user wants to classify, code, or label text at scale. Category discovery goes to topic-modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into an analysis-ready long-format dataset, covering export settings, identifying the implementation, package or manual wide-to-long reshaping, choice-profile alignment, ratings, reference categories, pilot exclusion, and subgroup merges. Use when the user has a conjoint CSV to clean, reshape, or debug, cannot align choices with profiles, or asks what the data must look like before AMCE estimation. Design goes to conjoint-design, validity review to conjoint-diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, improve, or audit Vapi voice agent and Squad system prompts for production phone and web based voice agents. Use when the user wants help designing a Vapi assistant prompt, multi-assistant Squad prompt set, refining an existing prompt, creating prompt sections, building an intake or handoff workflow, improving tool-use instructions, adding guardrails, or optimizing voice-agent behavior for brevity, turn-taking, error handling, caller data collection, escalation, handoffs, and spoken formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in recreation of the Bun + TypeScript framework used to build Vapi's landing-page voice agents from a ROUGH_DRAFT.md spec, including a scenario registry, language stacks, prompt composer, assistant builder, and idempotent bootstrap script. Use only when the user explicitly invokes vapi-bootstrap-framework or specifically asks to reproduce or experiment with the landing-page-agent architecture. Do not use for ordinary Vapi assistant builds; use create-assistant, create-tool, create-squad, and vapi-prompt-builder instead. Targets Bun + TypeScript + @vapi-ai/server-sdk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, create, or validate saved and transient Vapi voice assistants. Use for new phone or web agents, production system prompts and first messages, saved-versus-transient architecture, model/voice/transcriber selection, multilingual compatibility, existing tool attachment, native call-control tools, assistant hooks, and Create Assistant API validation errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。