データ・AIのスキル

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eight tested identity approaches for Claude prompts, each shaping depth, vocabulary, reasoning style, and what Claude treats as obvious vs. requiring explanation. Use when the user wants a specific identity template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building a role definition. Trigger on: "give me the Strategic Advisor identity," "show me the identity template for," "I need a Technical Architect role," "build a custom role for," "show me all available identities." Also use when reviewing a prompt's identity layer or when output lacks domain-appropriate depth. Provides 8 tested approaches across strategy, technical, research, communications, and operations domains plus a template for building custom identities. If the user is unsure which identity fits their task, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating complete prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for full prompt assembly — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and tune a running llama.cpp server for local coding agents: propose config (ctx, prompt cache, MTP), benchmark before/after, report deltas. Use to optimize llama-server for Claude Code or Aider. Don't use for vLLM, ollama, or non-llama.cpp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Image generation skill using Gemini Web. Generates images from text prompts via Google Gemini. Also supports text generation. Use as the image generation backend for other skills like cover-image, xhs-images, article-illustrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform research papers into professional visual schemas. Analyzes paper logic, selects optimal layout patterns, and generates detailed prompts for AI image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute queries on the Postgres database. Use this skill DIRECTLY whenever the user asks anything about database contents, counts, or data — do NOT read compose.yml or SQL migration files first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot and drive the tbh-meter app + reader locally to see a change working — what runs on macOS (UI only; the reader is win32-only) and how to feed the overlay/list fake data. Use when asked to run/start the meter, verify a change in the running app, screenshot the overlay, or reproduce a bug locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「统一数据仓库 — AI的数据基础设施」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to unified-data-warehouse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「数据飞轮 — AI产品自我强化的增长引擎」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to data-flywheel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「不为数据而收购 — 数据投资的价值验证原则」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to dont-acquire-for-data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「不等完美数据 — 先用起来再迭代」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to dont-wait-perfect-data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户想系统评估一个AI项目是否值得投入时使用，结合概念简单性和数据充足性两个维度。 用户在问"这个想法可行吗"、"我们需要多少数据"、"技术上能做到吗"时激活。 不适用于: 纯数据科学洞察项目、探索性分析、已明确不需要AI的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户想快速判断一项任务是否能被当前AI技术自动化时使用。 用户在问"这个AI能做吗"、"技术上可行吗"、"能不能用AI自动完成X"时激活。 不适用于: 需要深度可行性分析的项目评估、涉及情感共鸣或复杂推理的创意任务、LLM时代的长文本生成场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「统计化验收标准 — 不追求100%准确」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to statistical-acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「ML项目流程 — 收集→训练→部署→迭代」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to ml-workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「ML产出软件,DS产出洞察 — 项目类型判定框架」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to ml-vs-ds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and reviews Swift App Intents code that exposes app actions and data to Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence. Use when adding AppIntent, AppEntity, OpenIntent, AppShortcutsProvider, EntityQuery, Focus Filters, AssistantEntity/AssistantIntent schemas, on-screen awareness, LongRunningIntent/CancellableIntent, EntityCollection, SyncableEntity, AppIntentsTesting, or when wiring SwiftData/networked data into intents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5つの専門エージェントがディスカッション型で競合のビジネスモデル・機能・価格・弱点を網羅的に分析し、 差別化ポイントと参入戦略を導出するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合いながら調査し、ca-data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 Phase 1 で競合プロファイル・レビュー・機能をディスカッション型で調査し、 Phase 2 でポジショニング戦略家が統合。 Gate 1（中間合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Independent Validation + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 Use when: 競合を分析したい、差別化ポイントを見つけたい、 市場のプレイヤーを調べたい、ポジショニングを考えたい。 Triggers: "競合分析", "competitive analysis", "競合調査", "差別化", "ポジショニング", "competitor", "競合", "市場プレイヤー", "ライバル調査", "competitive landscape"

Use when the user needs to design, run, or audit product or GTM analytics — metric hierarchies and north stars, funnels, cohort retention, churn, pipeline velocity, forecasting, lead scoring, NRR, A/B tests, or analytical SQL — or uploads a dataset to analyze. Triggers on questions like "why did activation drop", "is this metric meaningful", "review my dashboard", or "what should I measure". For writing the spec that defines a feature's success metrics, use product-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or improve a Senpai target repository's program.md. Use this skill whenever the user wants to point Senpai at a fresh ML or research target repository, define the research objective, primary metric, benchmark contract, allowed edit boundaries, W&B reporting contract, or prepare a repo for autonomous advisor/student experiment loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。