UI/UX、ロゴ、スライド、画像生成（7,382 件）
Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design integrity, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation, including the guardrail against reading an AMCE as majority preference. Use when the user asks whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, has referee comments on a conjoint, or wants a second opinion on estimation or interpretation. New designs go to conjoint-design, reshaping to conjoint-cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DRAFT. Design and harden a standing Luma registration/unsubscribe webhook that enriches guests and writes to CRM or customer DB — with backfill and versioning. Not installed by deepline skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design RESTful APIs with best practices for consistency and usability
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Script the spoken opening that decides retention: the first 30 seconds of a long-form YouTube video or the first 3 seconds of a YouTube Short. Uses 2026 patterns (restate-and-raise, cold-open payoff tease, question-and-contract, and the 3-second frame-one Shorts hook with a designed loop) to confirm the title's promise, open a loop, and earn the next 30 seconds with no intro. Use to write or fix a video opening. Not for the title (use yt-title-optimizer) or description (use yt-description-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write YouTube community-tab posts: text updates, polls, image-caption posts, and questions that drive comments and bring subscribers back between video uploads. Tuned to the community tab's role as a low-friction touchpoint that keeps a channel warm and feeds session signals. Returns a copy-paste block (community posts have no publishing API, so this is always manual by design). Use to write a community post or poll. Not for video titles or descriptions (use yt-title-optimizer and yt-description-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open a ready-to-use local 3D model composition workbench for GLB or GLTF files. Use when the user says "打开模型工作台", asks to place, rotate, scale, arrange, or frame one or more 3D models, or needs a clean composition screenshot before website or Image 2 design. If the user has not supplied a model, request GLB/GLTF files first; after models are available, generate the workspace, start its localhost server, and open it automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, evaluate, or teach graph-based systems. Use for knowledge graphs, ontology/schema design, entity/relation/event extraction, entity resolution and fusion, GraphRAG or graph memory, and agent/task dependency graphs with concurrency, joins, failure handling, verification, or human gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run controlled experiments using the experiment-registry MCP server — domain-agnostic, pluggable, mechanically enforced. Use when you need evidence that a change actually improves behaviour.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any CLI/TUI display code is written, modified, or audited — runs the 7-stage discipline (Context, Register, Shape brief, Implement, Critique, Audit, Polish) for Typer, Rich, Textual, and Questionary work, grounded in per-project PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.TUI.md/DESIGN.md. Triggers on output formatting, display design, interactive prompts, visual consistency, TUI layout, progress display, dashboard design, design audit, design polish, design critique, shape brief, register decision (brand-cli vs product-cli), and AI-slop checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when facing unknowns, debugging without a clear cause, or making architecture decisions — enforces hypothesis-driven scientific reasoning through observation, hypothesis formulation, prediction, experiment design, and evidence-based conclusion. Use when previous attempts have failed or the problem space involves uncertainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently assessing how bounded Python code could accomplish the same behavior with less maintained code, more Pythonic design, newer language/stdlib capabilities, or well-maintained ecosystem libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently hunting Python code smells, deviations from engineering standards, maintenance hazards, or suspicious design choices in a bounded review surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or adapt Claude Code agent definitions. Use when creating an agent, changing subagent configuration, selecting agent scope, or designing a specialized delegation role.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess a plugin and produce an executable refactoring design, task plan, and context manifest. Use when preparing systematic plugin refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge reference for Autonomous Refinement Loop research — pattern research into prerequisites for autonomous execution without synchronous human blocking gates. Defines failure categories, prerequisites, and conditions for replacing human judgment with machine-verifiable checks. Use when designing or evaluating autonomous agent loops, gate conditions, or HOOTL execution patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the full plugin development lifecycle from blank canvas to marketplace-ready. Use when creating a new plugin, improving an existing plugin, fixing validation errors, or taking a plugin through assessment, research, design, creation, debugging, optimization, and verification. Complements /plugin-creator:plugin-creator which provides the detailed new-plugin creation workflow with discussion capture, parallel research, and atomic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new Claude Code plugin from scratch — orchestrates prerequisite check, user discussion, parallel research, design with verification, atomic implementation, multi-layer validation, documentation, and final verification. For existing plugin improvement, use /plugin-creator:plugin-lifecycle instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design pattern for converting rule-following, checklist, or rubric skills into a fan-out map-reduce ensemble of parallel rigid sub-agents with corroboration-weighted merge; worker model tier and diversity are knobs matched to inference load and stakes, not fixed values. Apply when creating or refactoring a skill or agent that applies 10+ independent criteria in a single pass. Triggers on: 'review against a checklist', 'fan out', 'map reduce review', 'ensemble', 'split the rules', 'apply rubric', or any large ruleset being applied by one agent in one pass. NOT for tight single-pass transforms or rulesets under 5 criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Works backward from the stated goal through its prerequisite chain — what must exist to reach the goal, then what each of those requires, back to the current state — classifying each prerequisite as AVAILABLE, DERIVABLE, or MISSING, and blocking planning until nothing is MISSING. Use before creating plans, delegating to agents, or defining acceptance criteria. Activates on specs, PRDs, tickets, RFCs, architecture designs, and multi-step engineering tasks. Always pass `#N` or an inline goal — invoking with no argument and no inline context returns BLOCKED. Integrates with CoVe-style planning pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestration or planning agents are producing task plans, task prompts, or TASK.md instructions that must be unambiguous, verifiable, and resistant to hallucination. Applies CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective) to structure and write agent task prompts, then adds CoVe (Chain of Verification) checks where accuracy risk is meaningful. Activates on draft task prompts, swarm plans, migration tasks, and multi-step plans requiring independently executable steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。