デザインのスキル

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review breaking changes in this spec; Check compatibility risks; Avoid breaking changes in this OpenSpec change; Review migration impact before release; Assess command and skill compatibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a database schema or data-meaning change needs Parallel Change, including expand, migrate, and contract sequencing for column renames, type or data reinterpretation, large-table backfills, relationship-table changes, enum/status transitions, timezone/default changes, and index or uniqueness changes. This should trigger before framework-specific Flyway implementation guidance when deciding whether a migration needs a compatibility window or whether a simpler migration is sufficient. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java implementation work should be guided by Test-Driven Development, including maintaining a test list, choosing the next behavior, writing a failing test first, implementing only enough production code to pass, and refactoring while keeping tests green. This should trigger for requests such as Apply TDD; Use test-driven development; Drive this Java change with tests; Write the failing test first; Red-green-refactor this feature. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a large feature, story, plan, or spec idea needs to be split into small vertical slices with the Hamburger Method. This should trigger for requests such as Split this oversized story; Find the smallest useful slice; Break this feature into vertical slices; Apply the Hamburger Method; Turn this broad plan into tracked slices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a complex or risky code change should be split into Kent Beck's two-step method by first making the change easy through behavior-preserving preparatory refactoring, then making the intended behavior change once the design supports it. This should trigger for requests such as Apply two-step change; Make this risky change safer; Refactor before changing behavior; Separate preparation from behavior change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or refining a structured Java implementation plan from trusted issue summaries, approved designs, ADRs, OpenSpec changes, existing plans, or a valid combination. The plan records its source artifacts and derivation direction and can remain the execution artifact without requiring OpenSpec. This should trigger for requests such as Create a plan from an issue; Create a plan from OpenSpec; Design an implementation plan; Refine an existing plan. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for type design quality — including establishing clear type hierarchies, applying consistent naming conventions, eliminating primitive obsession with domain-specific value objects, leveraging generic type parameters, creating type-safe wrappers, designing fluent interfaces, ensuring precision-appropriate numeric types (BigDecimal for financial calculations), and improving type contrast through interfaces and method signature alignment. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for type design; Improve type design in Java code; Fix primitive obsession in Java code; Create value objects in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an issue; Convert a plan into OpenSpec; Update an OpenSpec change; Split broad requirements into reviewable changes. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare interface designs and find structural friction. Use when: a change spreads across modules or a boundary is unclear. For code changes, use Refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unattended Impeccable check → fix loop on one page or component. It reads the target's code, grills Eric (at most 10 questions, "you pick" welcome) into a per-project taste and direction file, then runs bounded rounds. Each round a fresh checker runs Impeccable critique and audit (design review and detector in separate sub-agents) and ranks typed problems, and a fresh fixer chains the matching Impeccable commands (polish last), keeps checks green or reverts, and commits. Shots cover before vs now, light and dark, 1440 and 390, plus section crops. A fresh finish reviewer grades every fix, and the loop ends in a draft PR with a Before | After table. Standalone only: started by `/ui-refine-loop <route|component>`, never by the super-board lanes. Use when the user says "ui-refine-loop", "/ui-refine-loop", "refine loop", "iterate on this page", "polish this page with impeccable", or "keep polishing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI command development specialist. Use when creating commands, designing argument parsing, automating tasks, or implementing CLI best practices. Specializes in command design patterns and user experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create components using ng-alain (@delon/abc) and ng-zorro-antd UI libraries. Use this skill when building enterprise UI features with ST (Simple Table), SF (Schema Form), ACL (Access Control), PageHeader, ReuseTab, and other @delon components. Ensures proper integration with ng-alain architecture, theming system, responsive layouts, and accessibility standards while following Angular 20 patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement authentication and authorization using @delon/auth. Use this skill when adding login/logout flows, JWT token management, role-based access control (RBAC), route guards, HTTP interceptors, and session management. Integrates with Firebase Auth and custom permission systems. Ensures secure token storage, automatic token refresh, and consistent authorization checks across components and services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

@delon/acl skill - Access Control List for role-based permissions and UI element visibility. For ng-events construction site progress tracking system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FigJam plugin development workflow. Use when modifying code.ts (canvas rendering), ui.ts (WebSocket/UI), fixing plugin build errors, or adding new rendering features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Angular 20 standalone components using modern patterns: Signals for state management, input()/output() functions (not decorators), @if/@for/@switch control flow (not *ngIf/*ngFor), inject() dependency injection (not constructor), and OnPush change detection. Use this skill when scaffolding new UI components that need reactive state, form handling, or integration with services following the three-layer architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。