開発のスキル

Utilize the native Windows binary `certutil.exe` to download malicious payloads and optionally decode Base64 encoded files as a Living-off-the-Land (LotL) technique. This skill details how attackers bypass application whitelisting and fetch stage-2 implants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full ASVS 5.0 compliance assessment against a codebase and/or architecture diagrams. Reads all 346 controls from the companion CSV, performs targeted code analysis per control, and produces a complete matrix marked COMPLIANT / NON_COMPLIANT / NOT_RELEVANT — with per-control reasoning and evidence (code snippets, file:line references, diagram observations). Outputs a reviewed CSV matrix and a self-contained HTML evidence report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypass antivirus and Endpoint Detection & Response solutions during red team operations using payload obfuscation, process injection, AMSI bypass, ETW patching, and custom loaders. Use this skill when AV/EDR is blocking your payloads, tooling, or post-exploitation activities. Covers shellcode encryption, syscall-based injection, unhooking techniques, and living-off-the-land approaches for opsec-safe red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OS command injection occurs when user input is passed unsanitized to a system shell via dangerous APIs: Java `Runtime.exec()`, Python `os.system/subprocess`, PHP `system/shell_exec/exec/proc_open`, C `system/exec`. Detect via pipe `|`, semicolon `;`, `&&`, `||`, backtick, `$()` operators, and time-delay payloads (`sleep 5`). Tools: Commix, Burp Suite, OWASP WebGoat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), historically known as Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), in API architectures. Extremely common and critical flaw where an API fails to validate whether the currently authenticated user actually owns or retains permissions over the specifically requested database resource (ID).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, exploit, and write custom payloads for classic Stack-Based Buffer Overflows in 32-bit and 64-bit applications. Use this skill when conducting exploit development, reverse engineering custom network protocols, or preparing for advanced certifications (OSCP, OSEP). Covers fuzzing, controlling EIP/RIP, identifying bad characters, generating shellcode, finding return/JMP instructions, and gaining reverse shells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code obfuscation analysis and deobfuscation playbook. Use when reversing binaries protected by junk code, opaque predicates, self-modifying code, control flow flattening, VM protection, or string encryption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical cipher analysis playbook. Use when encountering substitution ciphers, Vigenere, transposition, XOR, or encoded text in CTF challenges that requires frequency analysis, Kasiski examination, or known-plaintext cryptanalysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs. Use this skill when testing REST APIs or application forms that directly map user-supplied JSON or POST input to internal database objects. An attacker can inject undocumented variables (e.g., `is_admin`, `verified`) to illegally modify restricted properties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompile, analyze, and reverse engineer Android applications (APKs). Utilize tools like JADX, Apktool, and dex2jar to extract source code (Java/Kotlin), analyze manifest configurations (Intents, Activities), and identify hardcoded secrets or insecure API endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API reconnaissance and documentation review playbook. Use when discovering endpoints, schemas, versions, OpenAPI specs, hidden docs, and surface area for API testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anti-debugging detection and bypass playbook. Use when reversing protected binaries that detect debuggers via ptrace, PEB flags, timing checks, or signal/exception handlers on Linux and Windows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test APIs for authentication and authorization bypass vulnerabilities including JWT manipulation, OAuth2 flaws, API key leakage, broken authentication, and token forgery. Use this skill when assessing REST/GraphQL APIs for access control weaknesses, session management flaws, or credential handling issues. Covers JWT algorithm confusion, OAuth redirect manipulation, and rate limit bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for API security. Use when choosing between API recon, authorization, token abuse, and hidden-parameter workflows before any deeper API topic skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API authorization and BOLA testing playbook. Use when APIs expose object identifiers, nested resources, hidden writable fields, or weak function-level authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically discover hidden Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), uncover undocumented endpoints (Shadow APIs), and fuzz parameters. Use this skill as the pivotal first step in API Bug Hunting, transforming a basic frontend application into a vast mapped attack surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API authentication and JWT abuse playbook. Use when testing bearer tokens, API keys, claim trust, header spoofing, rate limits, and API auth boundary weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Arbitrary write to RCE playbook. Use when you have an arbitrary write primitive (from heap exploitation, format string, or OOB write) and need to convert it into code execution by targeting GOT, hooks, _IO_FILE vtable, exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, modprobe_path, .fini_array, or C++ vtables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

401/403 bypass playbook. Use when encountering access-denied responses on admin panels, API endpoints, or restricted paths. Covers path manipulation, HTTP method tampering, header injection, protocol downgrade, and automated bypass tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in API rate limiting enforcement. Use this skill when encountering HTTP 429 Too Many Requests errors during password brute-forcing, OTP validation, credential stuffing, or enumeration attacks. These bypasses leverage IP spoofing, parameter manipulation, and edge-case application logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants the full existing-registry Trust Magnitude inspector: understand why a named Gaia skill has a particular star rank, what its Trust Magnitude (TM) score is, which evidence rows are contributing (or dead), how far it is from the next grade, or what evidence to add to move the needle. Also use when asked for a full leaderboard of all named skills ranked by TM. Triggers: "why does X have 3 stars", "what's the TM for X", "inspect TM", "explain the score for X", "what evidence would rank up X", "show leaderboard", "rank all skills by TM", "what's dragging down X's score", "dead evidence rows", "how close is X to grade A/S".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。