リサーチ・学習のスキル

特定の日本株1銘柄について、企業概要・セグメント経済性・財務トレンド・株主構成・ガバナンス・リスク要因・競争優位の仮説・バリュエーション素材までを網羅した総合リサーチレポートを作る時に使う。「トヨタを分析して」「〇〇の株を調べて」のように1社を深掘りする指示で発火する。

Transform a supplied photograph into a tactile miniature layered paper diorama. Use for 微型纸雕、立体纸艺场景、paper-cut photo scenes or a photograph rebuilt as a handcrafted paper miniature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pair a source-faithful photographic upper panel with a small source-derived dry-brush illustration surrounded by generous paper whitespace below. Use for 摄影加极简手绘、上下双联艺术海报、photo and miniature illustration diptychs or quiet photo-poetry prints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

アーキテクチャ知識グラフ(memory MCP / memory.jsonl)の初期作成。「知識グラフを初期化して」「memory グラフを作って」「アーキテクチャグラフを登録して」といった依頼、またはプロジェクト初期構築完了後の仕上げとして使用する。コードベースを調査し、モジュール構成と依存関係を entities / relations として登録する。

Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after substantial web projects or repeated design defects to convert evidence into reusable skill improvements through root-cause analysis, regression scenarios, and controlled proposals without silently changing the core OS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user provides a URL from AMD / ROCm official sources (github.com/AMD/*, github.com/ROCm/*, github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/*, rocm.docs.amd.com, amd.com/…/rocm, gpuopen.com). Prefer this over generic GitHub for official ROCm URLs. Generates a hands-on tutorial-following project with no collaborator roles — only the user and the Instructor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WooCommerce store operations through NV oOS Pro — product research, catalog cross-referencing, inventory lookups, and Shopify or Flowhub comparisons where integrations are configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill for discovering and researching autonomous AI agents, tools, and ecosystems using the AgentFolio directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "codify how our founder sounds", "build a founder voice dossier", or "set our content pillars"; runs an 80%-extraction interview over the user's OWN posts, emails, and decks (never competitor scraping, never an invented persona) and produces the versioned voice record — a per-platform register map (incl. 小红书/微信公众号), banned phrases, per-context disclosure lines (the ECHO C2 upstream), a few-shot bank built exclusively from own posts, and 3-5 content pillars with Estimated %-allocations — submitted via memory/events/channels.ndjson for channel-registry to store as voice-dossier.md, the record every Craft-phase skill reads first. Not for the brand-level voice canon — use brand-language-codifier; not for audience/persona research — use audience-mapper. 声音档案/品牌语气/创始人语气/内容支柱/披露声明

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze influencer campaign performance", "compare influencers", or "find what content worked"; produces metric scorecards vs target and benchmark, platform/influencer/content rankings, engagement-quality and sentiment reads, conversion-attribution breakdowns, and ranked learnings. Not for dollar-level return math — use roi-calculator. 达人营销效果分析/投放复盘

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, analyze and synthesize customer research into pains, jobs, triggers, objections, language, segments and evidence-backed marketing implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Portfolio building, technical interviews, job search strategies, and continuous learning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with structured reports and charts. ONLY use when the user explicitly requests research/analysis, or needs data visualization with charts, or quantitative/comparative analysis across multiple sources. Do NOT use for simple questions or quick lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps an AI assistant write, structure, and edit articles in the encyclopedic style of Wikipedia — neutral tone, lead section, summary style, inline citations, no peacock/weasel/persuasive language, and the stub→FA quality ladder. Also covers Simple English Wikipedia rules. MADE BY SQERSTERS

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert software engineer and systems analyst. Use when user asks "how does X work" with expectation of depth, user wants to understand a complex system spanning many files, or user asks for architectural analysis or pattern investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。