Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
調査、論文、教育、資格学習(4,471 件)
Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill for discovering and researching autonomous AI agents, tools, and ecosystems using the AgentFolio directory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive PET selection guide covering differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and trusted execution environments. Includes use-case matching matrix, performance comparison, and GDPR alignment assessment for each technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements for research uses of protected health information under 45 CFR §164.512(i). Covers IRB and Privacy Board waivers of authorization, individual authorization for research, limited data set and data use agreements, preparatory to research provisions, and decedent research provisions. Keywords: HIPAA research, IRB waiver, Privacy Board, authorization, limited data set, preparatory research, de-identification, Common Rule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for managing consent for scientific research under GDPR Article 89 and Recital 33 broad consent provisions. Covers ethical review board coordination, purpose evolution management, appropriate safeguards including pseudonymization, and the interplay between consent and other lawful bases for research processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements federated learning architecture patterns for GDPR compliance. Covers secure aggregation protocols, differential privacy integration, communication protocols, and privacy-by-design distributed ML training. Keywords: federated learning, distributed training, secure aggregation, differential privacy, privacy-preserving ML.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
按章节惰性加载授课:每次只读当前阶段的一个 wiki 章节,用生活隐喻讲概念、解剖公式;重点题固定走 题面图→问题→读图量→公式→演算→答案详解→溯源七步,画图题先运行算法。用于讲懂当前章或老师勾出的重点题。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将已经讲完但尚未完成阶段门禁的一个章节整理成强类型教材清单,并在视觉模式下编译为公式可读、图片可见、知识点与全部对应例题逐项精讲的自包含 HTML/PDF。结构化工作区准备阶段完成证据、用户说 Markdown 公式仍是 raw LaTeX、图片缺失、要含课件/作业/Quiz/模拟考试题及答案的零基础讲义,或要求打印版时使用。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
帮助学生在临考前进行结构化极速复习:解析课程资料/大纲/重点,按章节生成 wiki 知识库与标准题库,组织针对性刷题与判分,并记录复习进度和错题。当用户即将考试、需要快速复习计划、练习题、错题复盘或考前小抄时使用(关键词:期末/备考/复习/刷题/划重点/错题;exam, cram, study plan, quiz, review)。不适用于长期学习规划、与考试无关的写作或编程任务。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover and review local human-AI conversations from Claude Code, Codex, opencode, Grok Build, and Cursor. Use when the user wants to revisit, search, extract, summarize, or compare work across Agent session stores, time ranges, projects, or named conversations. Follow the user's requested output; question clustering, problem-space mapping, artifact review, drift analysis, and insights are optional lenses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research why neural architectures and training methods work through forward computation, geometry, gradients, optimization dynamics, historical experiments, and competing explanations. Use for deep mechanism questions about neural networks, AI models, layers, representations, or training; explain the meaning in plain language with evidence and explicit limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Seedance 2.0 science, education, or general-knowledge explainer using layered handmade papercraft, miniature diorama depth, physical paper mechanisms, clear knowledge beats, restrained miniature camera, tactile sound, and stable reference roles. Use for one 4–15 second clip or a longer multi-clip plan; not for flat vector cartoons, live action, or paper-texture-only styling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a narration line, knowledge point, opinion, story beat, or abstract concept into a Seedance 2.0 editorial paper-collage clip with a clear visual metaphor, approved final composition, tactile stop-motion assembly, controlled paper texture, purposeful depth, and synchronized collage sound effects. Use for 4–15 second explainer or B-roll clips; not for realistic presenter ads or editable-layer delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Source-backed research workflow for AI agents: scope, sources, claims, and task-appropriate Lite or Full checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for source-backed research, analysis, report revision and updates. Understand the user's needs, follow their instructions and produce useful, well-reasoned results with methods and optional workflow tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your personal DSA & LeetCode mentor. Use for problem explanations, progressive hints, code reviews, mock interviews, pattern recognition, complexity analysis, and custom problem generation. Automatically adapts to your learning style and request type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a self-contained, beautifully styled HTML analysis of an academic paper. Use when the user provides an arXiv link, paper URL, PDF, or asks to analyze a research paper. Produces a standalone HTML file with structured sections (Problem, Translation/Analogy, Architecture, Key Results, Verdict), embedded figures, and responsive design. Trigger words include 读论文, 分析论文, paper analysis, paper review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, edit, replicate, import, and export draw.io diagrams with an offline YAML-first workflow: architecture, network topologies, flowcharts, UML/ER, org charts, Mermaid/CSV conversion, existing .drawio bundles, style presets, themes, and non-publication formula diagrams. For publication figures (paper, thesis, IEEE, camera-ready) use drawio-academic-skills instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publication-figure overlay for draw.io. Use instead of drawio whenever the diagram is for a paper, thesis, dissertation, journal, conference, IEEE/ACM submission, manuscript, camera-ready, Word/LaTeX figure, or other publication. Applies venue, figure-type, color, caption/legend, formula, and paper-readability gates for architecture, workflow, roadmap, network-topology, and replicated paper figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户学完一个东西想自查是否真懂、或觉得「好像懂了」但不确定时使用。用「费曼学习法」让他用自己的话把概念讲出来,你扮好奇学生专挑他含糊/跳过的地方追问,把「讲不顺的模糊处」揪出来作为没真懂的漏洞,定位是缺前置知识还是没想透,判断理解是否闭环。触发场景:我学完了考考我、自查一下、我好像懂了、我讲讲你看对不对、检验我的理解、这个我真懂了吗。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。