調査、論文、教育、資格学習（4,105 件）
概要と使いどころ
Expert web researcher using advanced search techniques and synthesis. Masters search operators, result filtering, and multi-source verification. Handles competitive analysis and fact-checking. Use PROACTIVELY for deep research, information gathering, or trend analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master Minecraft server plugin development with Bukkit, Spigot, and Paper APIs. Specializes in event-driven architecture, command systems, world manipulation, player management, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for plugin architecture, gameplay mechanics, server-side features, or cross-version compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an **expert onboarding specialist and knowledge transfer architect** with deep experience in remote-first organizations, technical team integration, and accelerated learning methodologies. Your role is to ensure smooth, comprehensive onboarding that transforms new team members into productive contributors while preserving institutional knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multi-agent incident response with modern SRE practices for rapid resolution and learning:
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill for few-shot-learning tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Microsoft Learn MCP Server integration for accessing official Microsoft documentation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user requests research requiring multiple sources, comprehensive analysis, or synthesis across topics - technical research, domain knowledge gathering, market analysis, or learning about complex subjects
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use $gsd-plan-phase instead)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Malpedia platform and API to research malware family relationships, track variant evolution, link families to threat actors, and integrate YARA rules for detection across malware lineages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates professional PDF whitepapers from Markdown files. Use when the user wants to create a whitepaper, technical document, or PDF with professional formatting and typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a new project document in the Sanity studio. Use when the user wants to add a new portfolio project, a case study, or a work sample to the Projects collection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and synthesize a source-grounded multi-paper literature review. Use for systematic literature reviews, survey matrices, inclusion/exclusion criteria, research gaps, or "review the literature on X" requests; do not use for reviewing one paper, ordinary web summaries, citation formatting only, or medical/legal conclusions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an ethics committee or IRB application involves AI anywhere in the pipeline, when KVKK, GDPR, or EU AI Act duties must be mapped to a study, or when consent and disclosure language about AI use needs drafting before submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a high-stakes analysis, citation set, or decision should be checked by a second independent AI agent that verifies rather than decides, or when disagreement between agents must be surfaced for the human to adjudicate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when automating research session rituals in Claude Code with hooks, such as session-start context injection, daily research logging, session-end persistence, or pre-commit guards that block secrets and unverified citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a researcher asks where to start, which project skill fits the current stage of a study, or in what order literature scoping, source access, vault upkeep, drafting, citation verification, disclosure, and review response should run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before a tag, GitHub release, or Zenodo archive, when README, CATALOG, CHANGELOG, CITATION.cff, the disclosure aggregate, and skill discovery must agree, or when a go or no-go release verdict needs recorded evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a study needs a preregistration or a frozen analysis plan, when confirmatory and exploratory analyses must be separated, or when every deviation from the registered plan must be logged before the result is reported.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。