Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証(1.3万 件)
Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a full dead-end page audit for any website. Discovers all blog/content pages, detects which ones have zero outgoing links to any URL on the same domain, fetches keywords, clusters pages by topic, and generates 3 outgoing link suggestions per dead-end page with anchor text, placement guidance, and ready-to-paste context copy. Outputs a styled HTML report matching report-style-reference.html. Automatically detects site framework (Next.js, static, WordPress) and uses the correct detection method: RSC header for Next.js/Vercel sites, standard curl for static and traditional CMS sites. Trigger when a user provides a domain or URL and asks for a dead-end page audit, outgoing internal links audit, "which pages don't link out", "find pages with no internal links in the content", "pages that are link dead-ends", or any variation of finding pages that have zero outgoing links to the same domain. Always use this skill for dead-end page audits — never attempt the workflow without following every step here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any SDK documentation site and produces a fully scored, downloadable HTML report. Use this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, score, or check the quality of SDK docs. Also trigger for phrases like "audit the SDK docs at X", "check if the docs at X are complete", "review this SDK documentation", "how good are these docs", "run an SDK audit on X", or any time a user pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. ALWAYS use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl → analyse → cross-reference → report workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Spawns parallel subagents for comprehensive analysis. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any domain's AI-readiness by using curl to directly probe robots.txt, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt, then scores each file against a structured checklist and delivers a formatted report with pass/warn/fail findings and actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever a user provides a domain or URL and wants to know if llms.txt or llms-full.txt is available, discoverable, or properly structured. Trigger on phrases like "check llms.txt for", "does this site have llms.txt", "find llms.txt", "check llms for this url", "audit llms.txt", "is llms-full.txt available", or any time a user shares a domain/docs URL and wants AI-readiness checked. Also trigger when the user wants to verify GEO/AEO readiness of a documentation site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any developer documentation site across 33 checks in 7 categories and produces a scored report (out of 100) with Pass / Warn / Fail status per check. Use this skill whenever a user provides a docs URL and asks to audit it, review it, score it, check its quality, or evaluate it for AI discoverability, SEO, structure, content, or completeness. Also trigger when the user says "run a docs audit", "audit these docs", "check this documentation", "how good are the docs for X", or pastes a docs URL with any evaluative intent. Always use this skill — do not attempt a freeform docs review without following this structured workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cross-checking a spec against a plan — that's /alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetration testing a running system, not for infrastructure-only scanning, and not for fixing what it finds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cross-checking a spec against a plan — that's the alignment skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test suite, assessing whether existing tests are worth anything, adding tests to a legacy codebase, or when the user mentions test coverage, test strategy, or weak tests. Not for reviewing a branch for bugs, and not for fixing the bugs it logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or updating a Makefile for a project, especially when standard targets (build, test, lint, format, etc.) are missing or when modifying targets that may already be wired into other tooling. Not for debugging why a build fails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, or photosensitive users. Not for general bug hunting or code correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route HugeGraph MCP regression testing tasks to the current public tool surface, including inspection, read-only queries, Gremlin generation, extraction, controlled import, schema validate/dry-run, safety guards, and admin-gated tool checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or deciding what to test in this CLI
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Join and operate on tiny.place (the agent-to-agent social network): create a self-custodied wallet, fund it via MoonPay, buy/renew/transfer a @handle 'domain', publish a discovery card, discover and resolve other agents, manage your profile and social graph (follow/feed/reputation), send Signal end-to-end encrypted messages, earn and spend through the jobs/escrow economy and marketplace, audit the settlement ledger, and poll the platform for updates — all through the `tinyplace-agent` CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding, code review, analysis, and research jobs to Google Antigravity CLI (agy) sub-agents that run alongside your own work. Use this whenever the user asks to spin off, offload, or delegate a task to Antigravity, agy, Gemini, or an "external agent"; wants a second opinion or independent review from a different model; wants intensive repo work (audits, large refactors, research sweeps) run in the background while you keep working; or says things like "have Antigravity do it", "spin up a sub-agent for this", or "get more done in parallel". Also use it proactively when a task is a good fit for parallel delegation and the user has expressed a preference for using Antigravity workers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test an app, API or CLI like a real user: launch it, try every feature or named ones, log bugs, perf and UX issues, auto-fix simple ones, report. Don't use for unit tests, E2E suite code, or design audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate App Store screenshots and header/search images for iPhone, iPad and Mac from a codebase or landing page, or re-render a set. Use when preparing a submission. Don't use for ASO keywords, review audits, icons, videos, or Google Play.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform a project into a professional open-source repository by adding LICENSE, README, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, SECURITY, and GitHub issue/PR templates. Don't use for documentation overhauls, landing-page generation, or registry publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate unit tests for untested branches and edge cases. Use when coverage is low, CI flags gaps, or a release needs hardening. Not for integration/E2E suites, framework migrations, or fixing production bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize a site or app for SEO, AI-bot search and app-store search in one run: detect web vs store, run each audit once, merge one prioritized report; fixes only via member gates. Don't use for one fix (seo-ai-optimizer, aso-marketing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install local-first security hardening: pre-commit secret detection, offline dependency scans, static analysis, reports, and gated free CI. Use when hardening repos or adding security hooks. Don't use for incident response or cloud security reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。