テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.3万 件）
Safely audit, classify, deduplicate, and reorganize Chrome or Edge browser bookmarks/favorites while preserving toolbar shortcuts, active profiles, and observable sync state. Use for browser bookmark cleanup, duplicate bookmarks, folder redesign, or login/reference/self-hosted link classification. Not for X saved posts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and audit PFC2D/PFC3D 5.0 model foundations for asphalt cases, including lifecycle, domain, balls, walls, clumps, groups, ranges, top-level cmat, staged saves, and source-version purity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate an external, licensed Itasca PFC 5.0 fistPkg26 tree as a reproducible material-generation and compression/diametral/tension test baseline; use to validate its PFC5.0 layout, copy a private working case, preserve provenance, and audit ck/ct/dc/tt/ft extension points for asphalt workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit PFC 5.0 asphalt dynamic loading and stress-wave studies with damping, timestep, rate, dispersion, source direction, boundary reflection, histories, and wheel-load handoff checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author and audit PFC 5.0 FISH for asphalt cases, including def/end functions, globals and locals, callbacks, numbered histories, object traversal, command blocks, IO, and stop logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select, probe, calibrate, and audit the Burger viscoelastic contact model for PFC 5.0 asphalt-mixture cases, including Maxwell-Kelvin parameter roles, units, temperature/rate dependence, PFC5 cmat assignment, timestep checks, creep/recovery validation, and PFC5-only syntax boundary checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adapt and audit a PFC 5.0 asphalt Marshall stability/flow simulation using the external fistPkg26 dc.fis two-head controller as a starting skeleton; use for curved-head geometry, PFC5 wall/contact kinematics, load-deformation histories, peak stability, edition-specific flow processing, and validation against laboratory data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument and post-process PFC 5.0 asphalt damage studies using bond-break hits, clustered AE events, macro energy density, source fields, stage summaries, and auditable CSV outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, audit, and post-process PFC 5.0 asphalt calibration tests, including compression, diametral loading, direct tension, creep-recovery, test geometry, histories, peak metrics, stiffness, and fistPkg handoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, recover, and prepare portable handoffs of existing private PFC2D/PFC3D 5.0 asphalt cases, including integrity manifests, path portability, saved-state claims, cheap restore-first validation, and legacy-state quarantine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build PFC 5.0 asphalt-mixture specimens with explicit aggregate objects, a declared homogenized-mastic or fine-particle abstraction, residual air voids, measured gradation conversion, contact-pair assignment, compaction, equilibrium, and mass-volume closure; use before Marshall, rutting, creep, or strength tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit PFC 5.0 wall servo, loading-rate control, equilibrium checks, micro-to-macro calibration, two-target local solves, DOE campaigns, and independent confirmation for asphalt models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, and audit PFC3D 5.0 asphalt wheel-tracking and intersection-rutting simulations using RVE-to-strip-to-full-size scaling, PFC5-compatible vector reaction control, Burger-calibrated contacts, vertical-horizontal coupled loads, rut/shear histories, edition-specific metrics, and explicit surrogate validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Super Base Context — project doc loader & synchronizer. Triggers even without explicit "load docs"/"sync docs." READ MODE — load architecture/modules/coding/decision docs when work references project state: code work (write/modify/remove); design (features/APIs/schemas/architecture); review (modules, past solutions); tech selection; ADR research; migration/refactor planning; performance/security analysis; tests; code reviews; any spec/plan/design/ADR referencing project. WRITE MODE — NET DELTA vs. last doc sync: additions/modifications/REMOVALS/deprecations of previously-synced code or decisions (docs revert: delete BCU file/ADR), AND rollbacks. User signals: sync docs/done/ready to commit/pre-commit/record decision. Auto-fires before final task-completion reply. WRITE MODE does NOT fire on: brainstorming, generic/read-only Q&A, in-session try-and-undo with no net change, already-synced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Live developer experience audit. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply the Resource-Based View (Barney, 1991) and VRIO framework to evaluate whether a firm's resources and capabilities confer sustained competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to assess internal resources for strategic value, determine if a competitive edge is sustainable, audit resource portfolios for VRIO criteria, or when they ask 'what makes our advantage sustainable', 'which resources matter most', or 'can competitors replicate this'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chief Security Officer mode. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss) to build theory inductively from qualitative data through open, axial, and selective coding. Use this skill when the user needs to develop new theory from data rather than test existing hypotheses, conduct theoretical sampling and constant comparison, determine when theoretical saturation is reached, or when they ask 'what theory explains this phenomenon', 'how do I code qualitative data systematically', or 'when do I stop collecting data'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test hypothesized causal structures by combining measurement models (CFA) and structural models (path analysis). Use this skill when the user needs to validate latent constructs, test mediation or moderation paths, assess model fit with CFI/TLI/RMSEA/SRMR, or when they ask 'do these variables form a causal chain', 'how do I test my theoretical model', or 'is my measurement model valid'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply dual-process theory to diagnose whether judgments arise from fast intuitive (System 1) or slow analytical (System 2) processing and identify resulting cognitive biases. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why quick decisions go wrong, design choice architectures that account for cognitive defaults, audit decision processes for heuristic errors, or when they ask 'why do people misjudge probability', 'how to reduce snap-judgment errors', or 'when does intuition fail'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Difference-in-Differences (DID) to estimate causal treatment effects by comparing changes in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Use this skill when the user evaluates policy interventions, natural experiments, or regulatory changes, needs to test parallel trends, or when they ask 'did this policy work', 'how do I identify causal effects without randomization', or 'what is the treatment effect'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply brand equity frameworks (Aaker, 1991; Keller, 1993) to assess and build customer-based brand value. Use this skill when the user needs to audit brand strength, diagnose brand equity components, design brand-building strategies, or when they ask 'how strong is our brand', 'what drives brand value', or 'how do we build brand equity'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial fresh-context review for non-trivial decisions before they stand. Use for production-impacting logic, security-sensitive changes, unfamiliar code, or high-blast-radius architecture choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。