テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.3万 件）
Use when working in the deepseek-harness repo to find non-obvious simplification candidates, write proposed Agent Notes or inline TODO/FIXME/XXX notes, audit or coalesce superseded Agent Notes, or fold worthwhile simplification ideas from another PR; especially for dead, duplicated, speculative, over-built, added-then-removed, or hand-rolled-where-a-dependency-exists surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Invoice-Downloader work involves mailbox batch tests, truth audit, regression validation, P0/P1/P2 decisions, packaged frontend acceptance, or clean reruns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, restoring, trimming, or auditing prose in the deepseek-harness repo, including deciding where documentation or comments are required across Markdown, JSDoc, code and test comments, prompts, descriptions, diagnostics, and CLI or UI strings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding, auditing, pruning, archiving, restoring, or reviewing Agent Notes in deepseek-harness; checks every new note for superseded active records, classifies implemented notes by future decision value, deletes rejected notes that no longer prevent a tempting fallacy, and applies the frozen archived/{kind} triplet and manifest rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing or fixing prose that reads like a leaked reasoning transcript — dead design-session citations such as (decision N), audit item codes, or §N of uncommitted drafts; change narration such as "used to", "no longer", "this cut"; stack or review vantage ("a later PR in this stack", "rejected in review"); reviewer-addressed justifications; control-flow narration; or hedged planning residue in comments, JSDoc, docs, or Agent Notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, moving, reviewing, or auditing documentation in the deepseek-harness repo — choosing hierarchy and detail, separating tutorials from references, checking tutorial progression, trimming doc slop, responding to a verify-doc-budgets failure, or requests like "improve the docs", "audit the docs", "where should this be documented", or "this doc is too long".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before pushing, force-pushing, marking ready for review, or claiming checks pass on a deepseek-harness branch, and immediately after gh stack sync publishes rewritten branches, to select the smallest tests and checks that cover the outgoing or just-published diff without reflexively running the full repository suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 2 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration (A6' upgrade). Audits compose output via Cite-or-Block strict — every anchor must reverse-resolve to an actual file in sources/, every fact claim must have an anchor. Returns verdict (ok/blocked) + violations list. Use AFTER cite-bound-content-generator (Turn 1), BEFORE report-bundle-builder (phase 5).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-disease market sizing entry skill. Triggered by user one-liner like "做 X 市场调研" or "Run market sizing for X". Auto-runs 5 phase pipeline: contract → stratify → recall → compose-audit → bundle. Hard-gates on Cite-or-Block: every fact claim must carry citation anchor verifiable against sources/. Resumable mid-run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add tree-sitter language support to codegraph end-to-end — wire the grammar + extractor, write tests, then benchmark extraction quality and retrieval value on 3 popular real-world repos. Use when the user runs /add-lang <language> or asks to add/support a new language (e.g. Lua, Elixir, Zig, OCaml) in codegraph.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark CodeGraph retrieval quality on a real codebase by comparing agent behavior with vs without CodeGraph. Use when the user runs /agent-eval or asks to test, benchmark, audit, or validate a codegraph version (the local dev build or a published npm version) against a language's repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
All animation knowledge for HyperFrames — atomic motion rules, multi-phase scene blueprints, scene transitions, broader motion-design techniques, AND the seven runtime adapters (GSAP default, plus Lottie, Three.js, Anime.js, CSS keyframes, Web Animations API, TypeGPU). Use for any motion or animation task: pick 2-4 rules and compose, or load a blueprint, or look up runtime-specific API (e.g. GSAP eases / Lottie player / Three.js mixer). Also covers auditing an existing composition's choreography (animation map) and 24 named text-animation effects. HyperFrames-native: single paused timeline, seek-safe, deterministic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, review, and diagnose tests and fixtures that can fail nondeterministically under CI concurrency, shared host resources, clocks, process-global state, subprocesses, network listeners, or asynchronous teardown. Use when adding or changing tests with those risks, investigating flaky CI, or reviewing test isolation; use pre-push-checks separately to select outgoing commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Agent Skills across Codex, Claude Code, local/global/project roots, Skill Hubs, GitHub, skills.sh, and managed plugin caches. Use when searching, installing, updating, upgrading, syncing, merging, auditing, deduplicating, cleaning, packaging, publishing, validating, resolving upstream sources, choosing runtime or scope, or working with skill-upgrade, check_upstreams.ps1, Claude Code plugins, skills-lock.json, or skill-upstreams.json. Do not use for ordinary software-package upgrades or non-skill file cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test egress and DLP controls using synthetic canary data across authorized exfiltration channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test APIs against OWASP API Security Top 10 including discovery, auth abuse, and protocol-specific checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test Docker and Kubernetes security controls for RBAC abuse, breakout, and secret exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess AWS, Azure, and GCP controls for IAM escalation and cloud service exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。