テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.3万 件）
概要と使いどころ
X (Twitter) integration for NanoClaw. Post tweets, like, reply, retweet, and quote. Use for setup, testing, or troubleshooting X functionality. Triggers on "setup x", "x integration", "twitter", "post tweet", "tweet".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browse the web for any task — research topics, read articles, interact with web apps, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and test web pages. Use whenever a browser would be useful, not just when the user explicitly asks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a composer output against four hard checks before delivery — cite integrity, voice rules, word count, schema validity. Always invoked after the polisher (English) or humanizer-* (Arabic / Hebrew). Emits a VerificationReport Pydantic object; orchestrator branches on `overall_passed`. Target ≥0.9 score per run. Triggers automatically as the final composer sub-agent; not user-facing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when exiting plan mode or before implementing to verify ADR intent, OBPI scope and plan agree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to wrap QA commands in ARB receipts for attestation evidence or to audit lint patterns from receipts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an ADR's Gate-5 audit; provides the audit templates and procedure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Namespace router → context preservation and orientation skills, plus the focused-context loader `gz context <ADR-ID>`. Use to pick the context/handoff intent or to load one ADR's full context bundle (body + OBPI briefs + covering tests + governance rules) before invoking the matched concrete skill or piping payload to an agent harness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the operator says "fly sortie S<N>" or "run a flight test"; flies one sortie with a human Go/No-Go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to verify every CLI command has its manpage, headings and index entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Namespace router → the four-axis health and integrity audit, read through four dimensions of agent movement (change point, jurisdiction, invariant, escalation). Use when the operator reports that gzkit feels "wobbly", misaligned, or that governance is not holding — or before a release, to check that declared mechanisms still fire. Routes to the concrete axis surfaces in a fixed cheapest-first order; owns the ordering rationale, the reading frame and the budget rule, not the analyses themselves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify Rash Studio scenes, ActionScript subset behavior, resource links, portable embeds, exports, and desktop or mobile interaction. Use for Rash acceptance checks, compatibility review, security review, or release validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and realigns UI to match design system standards, spacing, tokens, and patterns. Use when the user mentions consistency, design drift, mismatched styles, tokens, or wants to bring a feature back in line with the system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convex code reviewer — security, auth, validators, performance, and pattern checks for code in a convex/ directory. Use to review or audit Convex functions before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a Convex feature works — seed, drive as multiple mocked users via convex-test, assert behavior including the negative authz cases (wrong user refused, data-scope enforced).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, components, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control, or before any deploy of an app with auth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate convex-test tests for the app's Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize an existing Convex app: security, scale, upgrades, observability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Static analysis checklist for Convex backends covering 72 rules across security, performance, correctness, schema, architecture, configuration, and client-side patterns. Use when writing, reviewing, or auditing Convex code. Trigger on mentions of "convex-doctor", "health score", "static analysis", "anti-patterns", "audit convex", or before shipping backend changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。