テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.3万 件）
概要と使いどころ
Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y produce", "why did endpoint Z return no rows", "is this endpoint hitting cache", or "check the last N runs". Focused on a single named endpoint's runtime log entries, not project-wide auditing or query performance profiling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a recent time window. Use when the user asks "what flags were deleted in the last N days", "show me recently deleted feature flags", "who deleted flag X", "audit recent flag deletions", or anything similar. Handles the non-obvious gotcha that system.feature_flags exposes the deleted boolean but does not expose a deletion timestamp — the actual deleted-at time lives in the per-flag activity log and must be cross-referenced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize application performance, including bundle size, rendering, database queries, and Core Web Vitals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a repository to generate recommended Claude Code settings.json permissions. Use when setting up a new project, auditing existing settings, or determining which read-only bash commands to allow. Detects tech stack, build tools, and monorepo structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up Playwright end-to-end testing in a project, including test configuration, example tests, and CI integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Cursor's browser aria snapshots to audit a page for accessibility issues — missing labels, broken tab order, contrast, and ARIA misuse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations. Read when the user asks to audit, health-check, or review experiments or feature flags, check flag hygiene, or verify experiment setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a systematic security audit of a codebase, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and insecure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to author, edit, and adapt PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to customize a canonical scout for their own setup (narrow its scope, retune its thresholds, add disqualifiers), tweak a scout's schedule or dry-run posture, or write a brand-new scout from scratch for a specific use case (a custom event, a product surface no canonical scout covers). Covers the scout SKILL.md anatomy, the emit contract, the dedupe + scratchpad-memory conventions, the per-team skills-store path vs the canonical in-repo path, and the emit-and-inspect test loop (with dry-run as an optional safety net). Trigger on "write/edit/customize a signals scout", "new scout for X", "tune my scout schedule", "make a scout that watches <event>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add feature flags to an application for gradual rollouts, A/B testing, and kill switches using PostHog, LaunchDarkly, or a simple local implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start the dev server, discover API routes from the codebase, hit every endpoint, and report which ones return errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnostic test / biomarker accuracy — sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, accuracy from a 2x2 table; ROC curve, AUC, and the optimal cutoff (Youden) for a continuous biomarker; and post-test probability via Bayes. Use when you have test results vs a gold standard (binary 2x2, or a continuous score + true labels) and need to judge how good the test is, pick a threshold, or compute the probability of disease given a result. Emphasizes the prevalence-dependence of PPV/NPV.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) profiling for drug candidates. Integrates ADMET-AI predictions, SwissADME drug-likeness, PubChemTox experimental toxicity, ChEMBL clinical data, Lipinski rule-of-five, and CYP interaction data. Use for drug-likeness assessment, BBB penetration, bioavailability, hepatotoxicity prediction, ADME/PK profiling, or screening compound libraries before lab testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes chemical libraries by scaffold using Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, generic frameworks, cyclic skeletons, matched molecular pair (MMP) analysis via mmpdb, R-group decomposition, Free-Wilson analysis, scaffold hopping, and chemotype-aware ML train/test splits. Use when identifying chemotype clusters in a library, deriving SAR transformation rules, decomposing series into R-groups, performing scaffold-balanced QSAR splits, or planning analog campaigns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。