Better ISMS

Use this skill when an auditor, customer or regulator will ask how security events are logged and watched, and someone says "prepare logging evidence", "show we monitor alerts", "what do we log and for how long", "who looks at the SIEM", "prove an alert was handled" or "our monitoring evidence is just dashboard screenshots". Maps log coverage and retention per system, lists the alert rules that matter and where they go, traces real alerts end to end with timestamps, and writes an evidence pack with the gaps stated plainly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company answers to two or more frameworks and is collecting the same evidence twice, and asks "map our controls across frameworks", "crosswalk between our certification and our attestation", "can our ISMS cover NIS 2", "unified control framework", "collect evidence once, use it everywhere" or "what is unique to each framework". Builds one internal control set in the company's own words, maps each control to the framework references by bare identifier with an honest match strength, flags what only one framework asks for, and writes a control map plus an evidence plan where each artefact is collected once.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company needs to know whether the NIS 2 Directive applies to it, and asks "are we in scope of NIS 2", "are we an essential or important entity", "which country supervises us", "do we have to register", "a customer says we fall under NIS 2" or "does DORA replace NIS 2 for us". Works through sector, size, the size-independent cases, entity type, jurisdiction and sector-specific law, entity by entity and member state by member state, and writes a reasoned applicability memo with the facts each conclusion rests on and what follows from it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an internal or external audit raised a nonconformity, finding, exception or observation and the team must answer it, or asks "write the corrective action plan", "root cause for this audit finding", "respond to the major nonconformity", "CAPA for the auditor", "how do we close this finding" or "the auditor rejected our corrective action". Separates correction from corrective action, runs a root cause analysis that stops at a cause the company controls, checks for the same problem elsewhere, and drafts a response with actions, owners, dates and the evidence that will prove effectiveness at the next audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a covered entity or business associate needs to know where protected health information lives and moves, or asks "map our PHI", "ePHI inventory", "HIPAA data flow diagram", "where does patient data go", "PHI flow map for the risk analysis", "which vendors need a BAA" or "do our logs contain PHI". Traces health data from where it enters, through systems, integrations, logs, backups and vendors, to where it leaves and is disposed of, records the safeguards that cover each flow and the business associate agreement behind each external one, and lists the gaps as input to the security risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a team suspects its policies describe a company that does not exist, before an audit or customer review, or asks "do our policies match what we actually do", "check the policy against reality", "paper versus practice", "will the auditor find gaps in our policies", "our policy says quarterly but we never do it" or "align policies with how we work". Turns each policy into testable statements, samples the systems and records that show the practice, classifies every gap and proposes whether to fix the policy or the practice, with owners and priorities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the periodic policy review is due or overdue, or someone asks "run the annual policy review", "our policies are out of date", "re-approve the policies before the audit", "what changed since the last review", "policy version history" or "who needs to sign off which policy". Collects what changed since each policy was last approved (incidents, findings, exceptions, new systems, law), proposes the edits per policy, separates editorial from substantive changes, drafts the version history and approval record, and plans the communication to staff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an incident or a serious near miss is closed and the team must learn from it, or an auditor asks for lessons learned, and someone says "run the post-mortem", "post-incident review", "lessons learned", "retro on the outage", "blameless review", "root cause of the incident" or "what do we change after this breach". Builds the timeline from records before the meeting, runs a blameless discussion, finds the contributing factors, and turns them into a few owned, dated actions linked to updates of the risk register, controls, playbooks and supplier records, then writes the review and an action tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company with a security applicability statement extends its management system to privacy or to AI, and asks "extend our SoA for privacy", "which privacy controls apply to a processor", "AI controls applicability", "SoA for our AI management system", "are we controller or processor for this" or "do the AI development controls apply if we only use a model". Settles the company's role per processing activity and per AI system, decides applicability of the additional controls from those roles and the risk or impact assessments, and writes an extension to the applicability statement plus role and scope notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a published privacy notice may no longer match what the company does, or someone asks "is our privacy policy accurate", "check our privacy notice against the RoPA", "privacy notice review", "Article 13 and 14 check", "does our website privacy policy cover our vendors and cookies" or "update the privacy notice for the new product". Maps every collection point, compares each notice with the processing record, the vendor list and what the site and product actually collect, classifies what is missing, wrong, vague or stale, and drafts a redline plus the practice fixes that a notice edit cannot solve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an incident may have to be reported to an authority, customers or affected people, and the team asks "do we have to notify", "72 hours", "24 hour early warning", "is this a notifiable breach", "major incident report", "who do we tell and by when", "draft the breach notification" or "do we tell the customers". Fixes the facts and the awareness time, tests each regime and contract that may apply, builds one table of recipients and deadlines with the earliest first, drafts each notification for review, and records the reasoning for every decision not to notify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company needs a written risk assessment method before it builds or rescores a register, or when the current method produces registers where everything scores 3. Triggers: "write our risk methodology", "define likelihood and impact scales", "what is our risk appetite", "risk acceptance criteria", "who can accept a risk", "our auditor says the method is not repeatable", "risk matrix for our ISMS". Drafts a short method with likelihood and impact anchors in the company's own money, hours and records, a scoring rule, an acceptance threshold with an authority ladder, reassessment triggers, and a calibration test on five sample risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a team needs its first information security risk register, or has one that is a copied catalogue nobody owns, and asks "build our risk register", "draft a risk assessment", "what are our top risks", "risk register from scratch", "our auditor wants a risk assessment" or "turn our incidents and findings into risks". Drafts 20 to 40 company-specific risk scenarios from the material the agent can reach, scores them against an agreed method, proposes owners and treatments, and writes a CSV register plus a notes file of assumptions and questions for owners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company needs its record of processing activities for the first time, or has one that is really a list of tools, and asks "build our RoPA", "records of processing", "data map for GDPR", "Article 30 record", "what personal data do we process and why", "data inventory for privacy" or "our DPO needs a processing register". Drafts the record by processing activity from systems, vendors and team interviews, with purposes, data and subject categories, proposed legal bases, recipients, transfers and concrete retention, plus a separate processor record when the company processes data for customers, and a notes file of open questions per owner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when someone wants to contribute, submit or publish a GRC skill to the grcskills library (github.com/better-isms/grcskills, grcskills.com), or update a skill or author profile they already published there. Interviews the contributor for practitioner judgment, drafts the files in the library format, runs the validator and opens one pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company needs rules for how staff use company systems, data, devices and AI tools, or asks "write our acceptable use policy", "AUP for employees", "can staff use ChatGPT at work", "AI usage policy", "BYOD rules", "remote work security rules" or "a policy people will actually read". Finds how people really work (devices, apps, AI tools, travel), puts the choices to the reader as decisions, drafts a short plain-language policy with concrete do and do not examples, and adds a comprehension check and an acknowledgement text for onboarding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a periodic user access review is due, an auditor asked for access review evidence, or someone says "prepare the access review", "run the quarterly user recertification", "who still has admin", "check leavers still have access", "build the access review sheets for managers" or "our last review was a rubber stamp". Picks the systems in scope, builds account populations reconciled against HR, pre-flags leavers, orphans, shared and dormant accounts, assigns independent reviewers, defines the decisions to record, and plans the removal follow-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when staff already use AI assistants, coding tools or AI features and the company needs rules people will follow, and asks "write our AI usage policy", "can staff use ChatGPT", "generative AI policy", "what data can we put into AI tools", "approved AI tools list", "rules for AI agents and connectors" or "AI literacy for staff". Finds out what people actually use, sets a short list of approved tools with a data traffic light, rules for checking outputs and for agents that act, a fast route to request a new tool, and writes a two-page rule set, the approved tools list and rollout notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a company must work out where each of its AI systems sits under the EU AI Act, and asks "is this high-risk", "classify our AI systems", "AI Act risk tier", "are we a provider or a deployer", "does Annex III apply to us", "is this a prohibited practice", "what does the AI Act mean for our chatbot" or "which AI Act obligations do we have". Tests each system, one at a time, for scope, role, prohibited practices, the two high-risk routes, the narrow exemption, transparency duties and general-purpose models, and writes a reasoned classification record per system plus a summary table of resulting obligations to confirm with whoever owns legal interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when one AI system needs its impact on people and on the company assessed before launch, after a significant change, or because a customer, auditor or regulator asks for it, and the team says "AI impact assessment", "assess the impact of this model", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "who could this AI harm", "bias assessment before launch" or "sign-off for the AI feature". Describes the system in its context, works through impacts on the people it affects with evidence, sizes them, proposes mitigations with measurable triggers, and writes one assessment ready for the system owner and an accountable executive to sign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an external audit, attestation examination or assessment is coming and the team wants populations and evidence ready for the samples the auditor will pull, or asks "prepare for audit sampling", "what samples will the auditor ask for", "get our populations ready", "the auditor wants a list of all changes in the period", "evidence for the leavers sample", "Type II sample prep" or "how do we prove completeness of the population". Lists the populations an auditor is likely to sample, builds each from the system of record with the query that produced it, checks completeness and the evidence behind a dry-run sample, and writes a readiness file per population plus a list of gaps to fix before fieldwork.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a bank, payment or e-money institution, investment firm, insurer, crypto-asset service provider or other financial entity in scope of DORA needs to know whether its ICT risk management setup holds up, or when someone asks "DORA gap analysis", "are we DORA compliant on ICT risk", "check our ICT risk management framework", "prepare for the supervisor's DORA review", "does our ISO 27001 ISMS cover DORA" or "audit our Article 6 framework". Confirms the entity type and whether the simplified regime applies, maps the entity's own documents and records against the ICT risk management articles, and writes a gap list with owners, evidence and priorities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a customer or prospect has sent a security questionnaire, due diligence form or vendor assessment and someone asks "answer this security questionnaire", "fill in the customer's vendor assessment", "draft answers from our policies", "we have 300 questions due Friday", "reuse our previous questionnaire answers" or "which answers can we not back up". Drafts every answer from the company's own documents with a source and a confidence level, flags answers without evidence and answers that create commitments, checks consistency with past answers, and writes an answer sheet plus a list of items for owners to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when someone wants to know where to start with the grcskills library, or asks "review my GRC setup", "what should I fix before the audit", "which compliance skills do I need", "audit my ISMS folder", "give me a 30-day compliance plan" or "rank the skills for my company". Reads the frontmatter of every skill in the library, inspects the compliance material the agent can reach (repo, policy folder, registers, platform exports), ranks the 10 skills that would help most with impact, effort and evidence for each, audits what is broken, duplicated or missing, and writes a 30-day plan to files in a grc-setup-review folder. Read-only on everything else.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。