Data & AI skills

Use when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when deciding whether a project fits ACL versus EMNLP, NAACL, EACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, COLM, or an ML venue, covering contribution typing for NLP work, long-versus-short paper choice, the annual theme track, Findings-tier expectations, and sharpening the computational-linguistics framing before writing starts.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when packaging code, datasets, prompts, model outputs, or annotation materials for an ACL submission under ACL Rolling Review, covering anonymized supplement archives, scientific-artifact items of the Responsible NLP checklist, licensing and intended-use documentation, data statements, and post-acceptance public release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when designing the study for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — qualitative field studies (access, case logic, interviews, observation), behavioral experiments, surveys, historical/archival inquiry, or theory-laden archival designs, each with the ethics and site-anonymity groundwork done early. Designs the inquiry; it does not run the coding or estimation (aos-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when polishing the prose and structure of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript to AOM house style and an argument-driven voice. Late-stage polish; it does NOT build theory or check logic — do those first with amr-theory-development and amr-data-analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, AOM format and length, abstract, anonymization for review, references, ethics/originality, and required files. Theory-only journal; there is no data-availability or replication step.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when analyzing the material of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — coding and interpreting qualitative field data, estimating experimental and survey models, or running theory-laden archival analyses, with an audit trail appropriate to each tradition. Analyzes and reports; it does not design the study (aos-methods).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when articulating and differentiating the theoretical contribution of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — showing precisely what is NEW versus prior theory and why it matters. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (amr-theory-development) or check its internal logic (amr-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when the theoretical argument and hypotheses are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — building a mechanism and deriving testable hypotheses a priori. Constructs the theory; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (amj-contribution-framing).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section. Frames the contribution and implications; it does not build the original theory (amj-theory-development) or run the analysis (amj-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when organizing AAAI supplementary material, including the technical appendix, multimedia appendix, and code/data ZIPs, while respecting that AAAI supplements are due with the paper, treated as immutable after submission, must stay double-blind, and should never hide main-paper-critical evidence from reviewers who skim the appendix.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when stress-testing the LOGIC of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) theory manuscript — checking logical coherence, running thought experiments and counterfactuals, addressing alternative explanations and disconfirming cases, and verifying each proposition follows from its argument. This is ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT data analysis; AMR publishes no datasets, no statistics, and no empirical results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or fix the analysis (amj-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when building or cleaning the tables and figures for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — correlation tables, regression/SEM/HLM result tables, the theoretical-model figure, and interaction plots in AOM house style. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Migrates Synapse Data Factory pipelines to Fabric Data Factory, turning linked services into Fabric connections, inlining datasets into activities, converting global parameters to Variable Libraries, and mapping SynapseNotebook to TridentNotebook. Use for pipeline JSON. For Synapse Spark notebook code use synapse-migration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Answers natural-language business questions over existing Power BI reports and semantic models through the FabricIQ MCP endpoint, discovering artifacts, resolving entities, generating the DAX itself, and returning a plain-language answer. Use when the user asks a data question, including one that says to query the model directly. For DAX the user supplies, or measures to save, use semantic-model-authoring.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Converts Synapse workspaces to Fabric: Spark items, Lake Databases, Linked Services, and Dedicated SQL Pool schema/procedures for Lakehouse or Warehouse. During Pool-to-Lakehouse migration only, can migrate approved dependent procedure callers after notebook readiness. Excludes standalone pipelines and Warehouse administration. Triggers: Synapse workspace to Fabric, Dedicated SQL Pool to Lakehouse, Dedicated SQL Pool to Fabric Warehouse.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Orchestrate Project Osmos for long-running Fabric and OneLake data-engineering outcomes, including task status, messages, follow-ups, cancellation, and deletion. Osmos tasks are remote service tasks, not local background agents. In Fabric portal Copilot, direct interaction is unsupported; point users to GitHub Copilot CLI. Use spark-cli for direct non-Osmos Spark work. Triggers: "Project Osmos", "Project Osmos task status", "check my Osmos task".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.