Development skills

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Bug diagnosis and fixing specialist - analyzes errors, identifies root causes, provides fixes, and writes regression tests. Use for bug, debug, error, crash, traceback, exception, and regression work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Analyze conversation histories from multiple AI tools (Grok, Claude, Codex, Qwen, Cursor, Antigravity) and generate themed daily/period work summaries. Filter by date or time window.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mobile specialist for Flutter, React Native, and Swift native iOS development. Use for mobile app, Flutter, Dart, React Native, Swift, SwiftUI, iOS, Android, Riverpod, swift-openapi-generator, and widget work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Frontend specialist for React, Next.js, TypeScript with FSD-lite architecture, shadcn/ui, and design system alignment. Use for UI, component, page, layout, CSS, Tailwind, and shadcn work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Backend specialist for APIs, databases, authentication with clean architecture (Repository/Service/Router pattern). Use for API, endpoint, REST, database, server, migration, and auth work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Behavior-preserving refactoring specialist - plans and executes safe incremental restructuring with code smell / SATD / hotspot targeting, characterization-test safety nets, metric and coverage gates, and refactor-only commits. Use for refactor, refactoring, code smell, technical debt, legacy code modernization, extract method, hotspot, and characterization test work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Start work on a GitHub issue - assign it, move it to In Progress on the project board, branch from clean main, scan for related issues/PRs and sibling codebase patterns to replicate, then begin implementation directly with no confirmation gate. Use when the user says "work on

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Figure out the best new thing to work on. Pulls open items from the GitHub project board, weighs assignment and labels, then prioritizes cleanly closeable scoped work and issues that would wrap up a milestone. Use when the user wants to know what to work on next, or run /next.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Ableton Live Object Model (LOM) API reference for Python Remote Scripts and control surface development.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Creates and maintains Figma Code Connect files (`*.figma.tsx`) that map Figma components to code via the parser-based `figma.connect()` API. Use when the user mentions Code Connect, Figma component mapping, design-to-code translation, or asks to create/update .figma.tsx files.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when creating, naming, or placing a file or folder in libs/*, or when modifying or adding a file to an existing component (even when the barrel isn't touched) — component vs utility naming, the one-responsibility-per-file layout, when a folder needs an `index.ts` barrel (public API only), and the required set of files a component needs per lib. Load this before scaffolding or restructuring a component so the layout matches the codebase.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Configuring or troubleshooting the Nonprofit Success Pack Program Management Module (PMM) - program delivery, cohort setup, service scheduling, service delivery recording, and attendance tracking for beneficiaries. Trigger keywords: program management module, PMM, Program__c, ProgramEngagement__c, ServiceDelivery__c, cohort setup, bulk service delivery, service schedule, service participant. NOT for designing which outcomes and indicators to measure - use admin/program-outcome-tracking-design. NOT for NPSP donor, household and giving-rollup data - use data/nonprofit-data-architecture.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Configure or troubleshoot Health Cloud Care Programs: CareProgram hierarchy, patient enrollment (CareProgramEnrollee), consent prerequisites, program products (CareProgramEnrolleeProduct), provider associations (CareProgramProvider). Trigger keywords: care program, program enrollment, enrollee, program product, consent for enrollment, patient program outcome. NOT for care plan templates, problems and goals - use admin/care-plan-configuration. NOT for patient records, person accounts and care team roles - use admin/health-cloud-patient-setup.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Dry-run Trust Magnitude for proposed named skills or suites before curation. Use when deciding whether a proposed suite deserves A/S treatment, when checking Fusion Score structural inputs, when comparing repo stars vs suite component counts, or when asked to appraise a candidate before adding it to the registry.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill when the user wants the full existing-registry Trust Magnitude inspector: understand why a named Gaia skill has a particular star rank, what its Trust Magnitude (TM) score is, which evidence rows are contributing (or dead), how far it is from the next grade, or what evidence to add to move the needle. Also use when asked for a full leaderboard of all named skills ranked by TM. Triggers: "why does X have 3 stars", "what's the TM for X", "inspect TM", "explain the score for X", "what evidence would rank up X", "show leaderboard", "rank all skills by TM", "what's dragging down X's score", "dead evidence rows", "how close is X to grade A/S".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Close out a review/meta branch that lands an evidence-ingest / curation batch: create the named nodes, ingest verified evidence, appraise Trust Magnitude, calibrate stars, wire suites, correct upstream naming, stage ONLY the intended artifacts (dropping CRLF churn and blocking leaks), validate, and open the PR. Use when a curation/ingest batch is verified and ready to land, or when the user says "close the review/meta branch", "land the ingest batch", "wrap up the intake PR", "/gaia-review-meta-close". Wraps the deterministic hygiene in scripts/review_meta_close.py and gates the judgment calls (calibration, Origin, suite promotion, naming, merge) behind explicit human checkpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Explore a feature or CLI, reproduce defects and record bounded findings. Use for "explore X", "find issues with X", or the exploration stage of feature- pipeline; standalone runs return findings without automatically expanding scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Helper for release operations, compilation of changelogs between tags, version lockstep syncing, and promotion of GitHub releases from canary/pre-release to latest/production. Use when the user asks to "compile the changelog", "promote release to latest", "tag a release", or do version release operations.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.