Research, academic papers, education, and exam prep (4.4K skills)
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.
Plan philosophy and interdisciplinary papers by comparing preprint platforms, searching literature, identifying unanswered questions, and assessing originality. Receive a detailed outline with section word counts, key citations, and improvements based on a reviewer-style assessment.
Develop a literature review from a focused research question through search planning, source evaluation, organization, and writing. It helps compare findings across papers, identify disagreements and research gaps, and build an outline with practical writing templates.
Search for academic papers, retrieve publication details from identifiers such as DOIs, and create BibTeX reference records. Check existing bibliographies for missing information, duplicate entries, invalid identifiers, and formatting problems before using them in research writing.
Navigate a structured literature review workflow in Claude Code, from finding and screening papers to extracting results and following citations. Learn which related skills to use and how to organize findings, PDFs, and duplicate tracking.
Develop game theory papers from topics, model ideas, or drafts. The skill guides research questions, model design, equilibrium analysis, writing, and revision, with checks for mathematical rigor, citation gaps, and responses to reviewer comments.
Evaluate research papers and scientific claims by examining study design, statistics, bias, and evidence quality. Receive a structured critique of strengths, weaknesses, supported conclusions, and practical improvements, with uncertainty and limitations made explicit.
Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Organize research aims, methods, expected contributions, budgets, and timelines around each agency’s review criteria and submission requirements, including revisions responding to reviewer feedback.
Evaluate papers, research proposals, and literature reviews using structured criteria. Produces evidence-based feedback on research questions, methods, data, analysis, and writing, with optional scores and prioritized recommendations tailored to the work's stage and purpose.
Draft and check a systematic literature review using PRISMA 2020, a reporting guideline for transparent reviews. Organize methods and findings into a Word manuscript, create a study selection flow diagram, and format references in APA 7th Edition style.
Turn observations or preliminary data into competing scientific hypotheses grounded in literature. Develop explanations, assess what could disprove them, and produce testable predictions and experimental designs in a structured report with diagrams.
Proofread applied microeconomics manuscripts across prose, equations, tables, notes, and references. The workflow combines specialized reviews into a prioritized report with exact locations, suggested corrections, consistency checks, and items requiring author verification.
Check academic references in BibTeX files against CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Flag missing papers, mismatched authors, and questionable metadata, then export results for manual review or automated manuscript checks.
Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals for sound methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and clear reporting. Produce a structured review that separates major concerns from minor issues and gives authors specific, constructive suggestions for revision.
Develop literature reviews on AI for medical imaging, including segmentation, detection, and classification. Organize research from multiple sources into a structured manuscript with method comparisons, evaluation metrics, supporting citations, and limitations.
Develop a research question, search and verify literature, combine findings, and produce a structured report. Seven modes cover guided research discussions, briefs, literature reviews, fact-checking, and systematic reviews, with statistical pooling of study results when appropriate.
Coordinate research, drafting, citation and data verification, AI review, revision, and final formatting through connected skills. Start from a research topic, an existing manuscript, or reviewer comments, with progress tracking and user checkpoints.
Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA using agency-specific structures and review criteria. Develop research aims, significance, innovation, methods, milestones, and budget justifications into a proposal aligned with the funding opportunity.
Turn observations or preliminary data into competing scientific hypotheses grounded in literature. It compares explanations, evaluates how they could be tested or disproved, and proposes experiments and measurable predictions in a structured report with diagrams.
Search multiple academic databases, screen studies, assess their quality, and combine findings by theme. Produce a literature review in Markdown and PDF, with checked citations and a documented search and selection process.
Research industries, market trends, and funding activity to produce Chinese or English reports for private equity and venture capital research. Organize findings with sourced charts and tables, delivering PDF reports or requested DOCX and PPTX files.
Get a simulated peer review of a paper, abstract, or selected sections. Receive assessments of originality, methods, results, and writing, with specific revision suggestions, severity ratings, and a prioritized checklist for improving the manuscript.
Research a topic using preserved source material and produce a draft article with citations. Check existing coverage, agree on comparison criteria, and record findings, trade-offs, and unanswered questions, or update an existing research document.
Research technical, market, or academic topics through multiple available AI providers working in parallel. Combine their findings into a report that preserves disagreements, identifies gaps, attributes sources, and recommends next steps with priorities.