Research, academic papers, education, and exam prep (4.4K skills)
Analyze a dataset and the point a paper needs to make, then recommend a suitable chart with reasons and alternatives. Create publication-ready data figures and review them for layout, readability, and common visualization problems.
Investigate why code or a design decision took its current form. The skill searches available connected evidence sources, such as version history, tickets, documents, chat, monitoring, and analytics, then presents cited findings about decisions and tradeoffs.
Turn an investigation of a code change or subsystem into a plain explanation of what it is, how it works, and why it was built that way. The skill combines findings from companion how and why skills and adjusts depth to the reader's question.
Search the web through the Brave Search API and retrieve readable page content as Markdown. Filter results by country or date range, and use it to look up documentation, facts, and other web information without interactive browsing.
Use Perplexity to find web resources, recent information, or clear explanations drawn from the web. The skill chooses between search results and conversational answers, while directing specialized documentation and workspace questions to other tools.
Turn advice from videos, articles, tutorials, or notes into a practical Ship-Learn-Next plan. The skill identifies ideas to practice, defines a small deliverable for the first iteration, and lays out follow-up steps with success criteria and reflection questions.
Find academic papers across OpenAlex, PubMed, and Google Scholar, turn identifiers such as DOIs into BibTeX, and check references for missing fields, duplicates, or mismatches with a manuscript. It helps keep research bibliographies consistent and verifiable.
Develop research grant proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Get help shaping aims and technical narratives around agency review criteria, preparing budgets and supporting sections, and checking formatting and submission requirements for a funding call.
Prepare journal articles, conference papers, posters, and grant documents around the exact venue, year, track, and submission stage. The skill guides users to verify current official rules, choose an appropriate LaTeX scaffold, and inspect PDF page counts or fonts without treating generic files as official templates.
Plan and conduct systematic literature searches across multiple academic databases, screen and assess studies, and synthesize findings by theme. The skill verifies citations and can produce structured review documents in Markdown and PDF with established citation styles.
Search the web for current evidence, extract information from known URLs, and conduct deeper multi-source research. It can also enrich supplied lists with web-based details, find entities matching criteria, and monitor web changes on a recurring schedule.
Gather current scholarly evidence for a manuscript or research brief, then organize verified sources into reference records, evidence matrices, and claim-to-source maps. The default workflow uses Parallel Search and Extract; explicitly requested deep research and optional alternative backends are handled separately.
Review papers, research ideas, and other scholarly work with feedback tied to cited evidence, then check low-stakes assessment rubrics and processes for traceability and quality. It is not for ranking people or influencing consequential decisions.
Prepare and validate research documentation for clinical decision-support evaluation, including aggregate cohort, survival, biomarker, evidence, privacy, and governance artifacts. Helpers check structure and traceability using local files; outputs are drafts for qualified human review, never tools for patient care.
Prepare a structured, constructive review draft for an authorized scientific submission. Check how claims match evidence, assess methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figures, and citations, and organize actionable comments while keeping confidential material local.
Assess scientific claims and research papers by examining study design, statistics, bias, and confounding factors. Apply evidence grading frameworks such as GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias to clarify what the evidence supports and where uncertainty remains.
Turn observations or preliminary findings into clearly labeled research questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, measurable predictions, and analysis plans suitable for preregistration. Keep evidence and proposals distinct, with local tools to validate the structure of planning documents.
Ask questions about documents uploaded to Google NotebookLM and receive answers grounded in those sources with citations. You can also discover notebook contents, search and manage a notebook library, and check Google authentication status.
Research recent public conversations about a topic across platforms such as Reddit, X, YouTube, and Hacker News. The skill organizes fresh themes, cross-platform consensus, niche takes, and practical details into a structured brief and JSON for later writing.
Check statistics and other important blog claims against their cited sources. The report records confidence scores, flags claims without URLs as unverified, and highlights weak, missing, outdated, or unsuitable evidence for follow-up.
Ask a named Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) for answers grounded in its uploaded sources, then review the cited material. It uses a logged-in Google browser session, so it suits notebook research rather than general web research or note-taking.
Check a blog post’s statistics and important claims against cited pages fetched during the review. The skill reports evidence and match confidence, flags claims without citations, and identifies claims it could not verify; it does not rewrite the post or prove a source is true.
Research recent public discussion about a topic across platforms such as Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, dev.to, and Medium. Using web search without platform API keys, the skill creates a structured brief and JSON that writers can use to understand current themes and practitioner perspectives.
Use this skill to plan and assess customer conversations that focus on people’s real problems and past behavior. It helps shape non-leading questions, distinguish useful evidence from compliments or hypotheticals, and identify a concrete next step.