Research, academic papers, education, and exam prep (4.5K skills)
Builds an evidence-based landscape for a drug, target, or pathway. It separates disease relevance, druggability, preclinical and clinical evidence, competition, and development maturity to show what is supported and where uncertainty or strategic openings remain.
Compare papers by study type, methods, validation, and how carefully their conclusions match the evidence. The skill explains which papers best support a central claim, provide context or mechanism, or need cautious citation, without ranking by prestige alone.
Read a research paper figure by figure to map each visual to the claim it is meant to support. Separate what is shown from interpretation, judge the strength of the evidence, and flag conclusions that go beyond the available figures.
Map specific gaps in care from guidelines, reviews, and real-world or clinical-practice evidence. It organizes where current care falls short across the patient journey, rates how strongly each need is supported, and helps frame research value without treating general disease burden as proof of an unmet need.
Find biomedical papers through Semantic Scholar, turn papers into structured reading notes, and record insights from follow-up discussions. The accumulated literature can be synthesized into a Research Foundation Document for later protocol design.
Classify a medical or biomedical paper by the study structure its methods describe. The result distinguishes primary and supporting designs in hybrid studies, explains relevant evidence-family placement, and notes confidence and ambiguity for literature appraisal.
Map biomarkers in a disease area by type, specimen, use case, validation, and maturity. The structured evidence map distinguishes exploratory signals from externally validated or clinically embedded markers, and highlights limitations and gaps without treating popularity as proof of clinical readiness.
Explore heredity, Mendelian laws, and inheritance patterns through patient, example-led explanations in Gregor Mendel’s voice. The skill adapts to a learner’s level, connects classical genetics with later discoveries, and marks where evidence or knowledge has limits.
Shape an early or overly broad clinical or biomedical idea into a bounded, searchable, and testable research question. Identify missing elements, choose a fitting framework such as PICO or a mechanism-based structure, and suggest the next research step without answering the substantive question.
Maps a biomedical topic into research streams, populations, endpoints, methods, and evidence density. It highlights well-covered and thin areas and suggests possible entry points, while keeping those observations separate from formal research gaps or study plans.
Assess whether a biomedical research area is truly saturated or only busy on the surface. It organizes evidence about repeated study designs, validation depth, and major groups, then maps meaningful entry angles and the timing and feasibility of pursuing them.
Find realistic journal targets for a biomedical manuscript by weighing its topic, study design, evidence strength, and practical constraints. Get tiered candidates, fit analysis, a primary recommendation, and a next step after rejection.
Turn reviewer or editor comments into structured, point-by-point response drafts. The skill classifies each issue as acceptance, explanation, rebuttal, or additional analysis, links replies to actual manuscript changes, and flags unresolved requests or missing revision context.
Turn clarified research into a structured plain-language summary for colleagues outside the field. It highlights the study goal, what was studied, key findings, evidence limits, and practical next steps, with wording adapted to clinical, lab, computational, product, or management audiences.
Turn existing biomedical figures, analyses, and result notes into a clear Results section outline. It orders primary and supporting findings, separates validation from mechanistic support, reduces repetition, and flags missing information or places where citations may be needed.
Review a manuscript before arXiv submission for unverifiable references, leftover AI prompts or comments, placeholders, consistency issues, disclosure concerns, and moderation risks. The skill produces a located fix list and readiness report without judging authorship from writing style or rewriting claims.
Reviews whether manuscript claims are supported by the cited sources. It flags mismatches, overstatements, paraphrase drift, and possible second-hand citations, ranks concerns by severity, and identifies where more source material is needed for a reliable judgment.
Review an academic paper, plan revisions, or prepare responses to reviewer comments through staged work cycles. It estimates the workload, reviews contribution, rigor, writing, and editorial fit, then creates a prioritized revision backlog and exports reports.
Drafts or revises a grant application's Specific Aims page or an NSF Project Summary from a study idea, hypothesis, and supporting evidence. It helps organize the problem, research gap, aims, expected outcomes, and impact into the required opening structure.
Check a biomedical manuscript against reporting frameworks such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or TRIPOD. The review identifies missing or weakly reported items, distinguishes major gaps from minor issues, and prioritizes corrections while flagging when more manuscript material is needed.
Draft or revise the Methods section of a biomedical paper from a study protocol, analysis details, or existing text. It checks coverage against study reporting guidelines, aligns methods with reported results, and can adapt wording to a journal’s structure and word limit.
Search official sources, technology media, and community discussions for information on new products and technologies. Cross-check findings, note their dates and sources, and save an organized summary in a knowledge base.
Run structured web research and save findings to a dated Markdown note as searches progress. The final brief organizes key facts with source links, confidence levels, unresolved questions, and writing suggestions for later work.
Research recent discussion across major Chinese platforms, rank findings by engagement, and group related posts into cross-platform topics. The skill can also show current hot-search lists and produce cited Markdown, JSON, or HTML reports.