Guide a first computer-use agent run from environment checks to a browser-only task and a viewer of the run history. Explain each stage so users can understand the output and review screenshots afterward.
Verify changes to the copilot-kit-ag-ui demo by building and running its server. Check API routing, cross-origin access settings, and build configuration, then use real credentials to confirm that a requested chart appears.
Research U.S. legal questions using Westlaw materials, including cases, statutes, and administrative decisions. Receive a written report analyzing relevant legal authorities, with support for questions covering up to three jurisdictions.
Create a detailed legal risk assessment for a feature that needs closer review. Describe potential harm, likelihood, severity, and safeguards, then compare practical options and recommend a path in a standalone document for decisionmakers.
Prepare an internal Privacy Impact Assessment, a review of how a feature uses personal data. Check whether assessment is needed, examine legal grounds and policy commitments, and document specific risks, required actions, and owners in the team’s format.
Guide new legal clinic students through procedures and commands using the clinic’s uploaded handbook. Students practice client intake, document drafting, and research planning with fictional cases, then review verification habits and supervision requirements.
Collect consistent intake information for a new litigation matter, including conflict clearance, risk, owners, document preservation, and deadlines. Create a detailed matter record, an initial history entry, and structured data for the matter portfolio.
Track unresolved legal and regulatory gaps by age and significance. Review outstanding issues, close resolved gaps with a resolution note, or record a decision to accept a risk together with its rationale and the person accepting it.
Compare a regulatory change with an indexed company policy library. Identify affected policies, missing or conflicting provisions, responsible owners, and specific changes needed, with source labels and flags for uncertainty about whether the rule is in force.
Prepare a proposed policy revision to address a specific regulatory gap. Show deletions, additions, reasons, and verification flags in a separate review memo, keeping edits limited to affected sections for the policy owner's review.
Record dated developments in litigation matters and update the corresponding matter log. Capture status, risk, deadlines, and settlement developments, with proposed history entries and field changes shown for review before saving.
Build or review tables that match patent claim elements or civil legal requirements to product information and evidence. Each mapping cites a precise source location, while a separate gap list identifies evidence still needed for attorney analysis.
Handle personal data access, deletion, portability, and correction requests through a structured checklist. Guide identity checks, data searches, legal exceptions, and deadlines, then draft separate acknowledgment and substantive response letters for attorney review and human delivery.
Check regulatory feeds for updates since the last review and filter them by relevance to your work. Receive a digest grouped by importance, with source labels, effective dates, and comment deadlines where applicable.
Record how a legal matter ended, its final cost, differences from the original risk estimate, and lessons learned. Close active tracking while preserving the matter’s files and history for future reference.
Summarize litigation matters from a shared log, including risk levels, upcoming deadlines, stale records, and estimated financial exposure. Flag overdue tasks, incomplete conflict checks, and other gaps that need a legal team's attention.
Manage a professor’s review queue for student work before it reaches clients or courts. View pending documents by urgency and student, then record approvals, edits, or returns with feedback while preserving the original version when edited.
Compare saved privacy reviews or proposed data uses with current privacy commitments. Identify missing or conflicting disclosures, distinguish required from advisable updates, and draft suggested wording with recommendations on when to make changes.
Draft Word notices for legal holds, instructions to preserve records for litigation or investigations. Track issuance, refreshes, releases, and upcoming review dates in the matter log, and report overdue or missing holds across matters.
Organize legal work for multiple clients in separate matter workspaces. Create case records, list their status, switch the active matter, archive completed work, or return to practice-wide context while keeping each engagement’s information separate.
Set up a privacy legal plugin through an interview and existing documents. Capture applicable regulations, data processing agreement positions, and privacy impact assessment formats in shared settings, with options to resume setup or recheck integrations.
Set up a litigation practice profile through an interview tailored to your role and the side you represent. Record risk preferences, writing conventions, and working context in CLAUDE.md for later litigation tasks, and check available integrations.
Keep legal client and matter information in separate workspaces. Create and list matters, switch the active context, or archive completed work while retaining its files, with cross-matter reading controlled by configuration and explicit requests.
Track comment deadlines for proposed regulations and record whether to file, not file, or waive a response. See owners, remaining days, and decision reasons, with reminders for approaching deadlines on undecided items.
Is this your account? Link GitHub to bring it onto your creator page (Japanese)