Skip to content
cccskills

cpt13-g

@cpt13-g

5 skills2 repositories 304

Repositories

Skills (5)

Refine in search

Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cpt13-g/clarify-research-idea262Updated Jul 27, 2026

Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cpt13-g/build-research-evidence42Updated Oct 21, 2026

Implement and execute approved research Experiment, Tuning, or Design Cards with reproducible logs, metrics, environment, and artifacts. Use for bounded coding, debugging, and runs; not for changing claims, priorities, budgets, or the Research Spine.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cpt13-g/build-research-evidence42Updated Oct 21, 2026

Validate and scientifically interpret completed research runs, including negative, null, boundary, confounded, failed, and inconclusive outcomes. Use after execution to assess evidence and claim impact; not to edit methods or schedule experiments.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cpt13-g/build-research-evidence42Updated Oct 21, 2026

Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cpt13-g/build-research-evidence42Updated Oct 21, 2026

Is this your account? Link GitHub to bring it onto your creator page (Japanese)