138 skills (repositories by code-yeongyu) · sorted by popularity
Guides coding work from planning and implementation through checks on actual screens, commands, or APIs. It adjusts verification to the change’s risk and records evidence, decisions, and cleanup so completion can be assessed against the requested outcome.
Reproduce and fix LazyCodex or Codex defects in a temporary workspace. Verify the change with regression tests and real usage, then deliver an upstream Codex pull request or a LazyCodex issue containing the tested patch.
Reaches web pages the user's browser cannot open: WAF-blocked and bot-scored hosts, platform-native readers (Chinese and social platforms), archive snapshots with provenance, and a browser you own for stealth or throwaway profiles. Not for plain search, an unblocked static fetch, or a page the user's browser can open.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces: an Apple HIG-based checklist, paired light/dark captures at phone and desktop widths, screenshot evidence, and a per-item PASS/FAIL verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right or follows the platform's design guidelines.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Processes and analyzes data with resident-kernel engines (DuckDB, Polars) and one-shot tools. Use for CSV/parquet/JSON analysis, group-by/join/aggregation, time series, distributions, cleaning, or plotting a dataset.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance, and GitHub routing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Configures a language server so editor/agent tooling (diagnostics, go-to-definition, references, rename) works. Use when a project needs an LSP installed or wired, or a 'no LSP server configured' error appears.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Runs a hypothesis-driven debugging loop across any language or binary, escalating to orthogonal oracle angles and locking the fix with a failing test. Use for crashes, silent failures, hangs, wrong responses, memory leaks, async misbehavior, or reverse engineering.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks about Codex Rules behavior, injected project rules, supported rule file locations, matching, or environment configuration.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Finds, reads, and reconstructs coding-agent sessions across Codex, Claude, OpenCode, OMO/Senpi, and other local agent logs. Use when asked to find or search past sessions, transcripts, or subagent runs, or to recover what an earlier session did.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Searches and rewrites code by AST shape across 25 languages. Use when the target is a syntax pattern (every call/class/import shaped like X, a codemod, a YAML rule) rather than literal text; for plain strings, comments, or filenames, use rg.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides a refactor, cleanup, or restructure with the right decomposition. Use when the user asks to refactor, simplify, extract, or modernize code.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Handles git work: atomic commits, rebase, squash, blame, bisect, reflog, and history questions. Use whenever a task needs a commit or a git-history investigation; skip for ordinary code edits.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Applies strict, modern language practice (typed errors, exhaustive match, tests that can fail) for Python, Rust, TypeScript, and Go. Use for work on .py, .rs, .ts, or .go files.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Diagnose LazyCodex and Codex CLI installation health against the latest sources. Use whenever the user asks for a doctor or health check, says LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, or Codex behaves oddly after an install, update, or config change, suspects a stale, drifted, or broken setup, or wants the local install audited and compared with the latest LazyCodex and Codex code.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Drives a real browser through the omowright library from the js eval kernel: sites the user is already signed into, forms and clicks, JS-rendered pages, screenshots, web QA, extension popups, a human handoff for login, CAPTCHA or OTP, and a browser you own for scraping, bot-scored targets, network capture and QA traces. Use for any interactive browser task; not for a plain search or an unblocked static fetch.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Executes a written ulw-plan work plan with Boulder state, evidence ledger, worktree discipline, and parallel subagents. Use when the user says ulw-execute or asks to run a .omo/plans plan.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.