Results for “screening”

Converts a job description into a structured candidate-sourcing workflow. Use when the user provides a role and wants candidate criteria, search terms, source recommendations, and a screening process. Must avoid sourcing on sensitive personal attributes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Evaluates candidate profiles against a job description and hiring criteria. Use when the user provides candidate profiles plus a role definition and wants consistent screening, matched requirements, and an interview recommendation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Runs an 11-step data cleaning and variable screening pipeline for pre-loan credit risk models: sample analysis, OOS split, missing-rate, IV, PSI, and correlation filters. Use when preparing raw credit data for scorecard or default-prediction modeling.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Choose the design and the numbers a research run can honestly claim — write the structured METHOD RECORD (databases, date of access, search string, criteria, screening counts) that r0 validates, pick the claim strength a design can actually carry, record a statistic as data rather than prose, route to the reporting guideline the design owes, and decide what to preregister. Use when a run's question, design, search or statistics have to be settled before the writing, or when a claim needs a strength or a number attached to it.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reviews one employee software request (tool, purpose, users, data handled, cost, urgency) against the approved-tools list and the policies the user provides and returns a draft review for the reviewer: match state on the list with the row quoted, approved tools the list itself describes as covering the same need, policy clauses that bear on the request with quoted text, questions for the requester and the reviewer, and one suggested decision with its basis. Never approves, procures, installs or adds a tool to the list. Use when the user asks to "review this software request", "is this tool on the approved list", "check this request against our software policy", "do we already have something approved that does this" or "prepare the decision note for this tool request". Do not use for a full vendor security assessment, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for sorting mixed requests, use request-intake-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

- Entry point for open-source intelligence, investigation and verification work. Use when asked to investigate, research, verify, vet, check out, look up, background-check, trace, attribute or find someone or something; when a request involves due diligence, KYC or KYB, counterparty or vendor risk, sanctions and PEP screening, AML, fraud, business email compromise

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Knowledge base from the NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST HB 151) — the practical statistics reference for engineering, metrology, and quality. Use for: exploratory data analysis and the four univariate assumptions (4-plot); measurement process characterization including bias/precision, calibration designs, gauge R&R, and ISO/GUM uncertainty budgets; production process characterization (stability vs. capability); process modeling and regression (LS/WLS/NLS/LOESS); design of experiments (screening, fractional/factorial, response-surface, Taguchi); statistical process control (Shewhart/CUSUM/EWMA charts, capability indices, acceptance sampling); product/process comparisons (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for 1/2/3+ groups, ANOVA, multiple comparisons); and reliability (lifetime & repair-rate models, accelerated testing, reliability growth). Scope limits: this is applied frequentist statistics for measurement and quality — it does NOT reproduce the per-distribution formula galleries, worked case studies, datasets, plot images, or Dataplot/R code of the original web Handbook (those are described, not copied); it is thin on modern machine learning, Bayesian methods beyond conjugate reliability priors, time-series/forecasting, and Bayesian experimental design.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Knowledge base from the DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (Version 2022, OSD ManTech / Joint Service–Industry MRL Working Group). Use for assessing and managing manufacturing maturity and producibility risk in defense acquisition: the 10-level MRL scale and its non-linear, target-not-grade nature; the five demonstration environments (laboratory → production-relevant → production-representative → pilot line → production line); the nine manufacturing-risk threads and sub-threads; how MRL targets map onto Adaptive Acquisition Framework milestones (MRL 4/6/7/8/9); conducting an MRL Assessment; building a Manufacturing Maturation Plan; putting MRL maturity into contract language (Section L/M, SOW, AS6500A, DIDs); tailoring criteria for S&T, single-system, ship, sustainment, and industry contexts; and screening operational-technology cybersecurity. Manufacturing-readiness focused — it measures producibility risk and frames mitigation; it is NOT a technology-readiness (TRL) guide, a full systems-engineering process model, a cost-estimating or schedule guide, or a deep cybersecurity audit method (see sibling packs for those).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

財務指標の条件（ROE・PBR・配当利回り・自己資本比率等）で日本株を絞り込む時に使う。「ROE15%以上でPBR1倍以下の企業を探して」「配当利回りが高い企業ランキング」のような、条件検索・ランキング指示で発火する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design and interpret TypeSafe Jev decision requests in NV oOS — typed choice/score/noul questions, batching, confidence thresholds, composite scoring, and guardrails. Use when classifying, routing, scoring, or safety-screening content with the typesafe_decide or typesafe_guardrail tools.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when the user asks to "find influencers", "build an influencer list", or "discover creators in [niche]"; produces a multi-platform candidate pool, per-influencer profiles, authenticity red-flag screening, and a tiered shortlist with preliminary triage signals. Not for STAR scoring or ranking a known shortlist — use fit-scorer. 达人挖掘/找达人/创作者名单

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Import external skills from a URL (GitHub or other) or local path; discover, validate, security-screen, and summarize each skill so the user can choose which to import. Use when the user wants to add skills from a repo/URL or local folder, or when screening and selecting skills to add to the framework.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Molecular docking with AutoDock Vina (Python API). Receptor/ligand prep (Meeko + RDKit), grid box, docking, pose and binding energy analysis, and batch virtual screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Implement Adobe-specific lint rules, CI policy checks, and runtime guardrails covering credential scanning (p8_ patterns), Firefly content policy pre-screening, PDF Services quota enforcement, and OAuth scope validation. Trigger with phrases like "adobe policy", "adobe lint", "adobe guardrails", "adobe eslint", "adobe content policy".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Dose-response / concentration-response curve fitting — IC50, EC50, Hill slope, Emax/Emin efficacy, and relative potency from paired concentration vs response data (enzyme/cell assays, drug screening, agonist/antagonist pharmacology). Fits the 4-parameter logistic (Hill sigmoidal) model. Use when you have concentrations + responses and need a potency value, to compare two compounds' potency, or to judge curve quality. NOT for image-derived dose-response (use tooluniverse-image-analysis) and NOT for survival/regression (use tooluniverse-statistical-modeling).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Comprehensive ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) profiling for drug candidates. Integrates ADMET-AI predictions, SwissADME drug-likeness, PubChemTox experimental toxicity, ChEMBL clinical data, Lipinski rule-of-five, and CYP interaction data. Use for drug-likeness assessment, BBB penetration, bioavailability, hepatotoxicity prediction, ADME/PK profiling, or screening compound libraries before lab testing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Searches molecular libraries for substructure matches using SMARTS patterns with explicit handling of recursive SMARTS, ring membership, aromaticity dialect, vector binding, atom map indices, and reactive/PAINS/REOS/Brenk/Aldridge filter catalogs. Use when filtering compounds by pharmacophore features, functional groups, scaffold matches, or screening for assay-interference / structural alerts.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (MCTS, template-based), Chemformer (template-free transformer), ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, building-block availability (eMolecules, Enamine, Mcule), forward prediction validation (Molecular Transformer), and disconnection-aware multi-objective search (MO-MCTS). Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Calculates molecular fingerprints (ECFP/Morgan, FCFP, MACCS, RDKit, AtomPair, TopologicalTorsion, Avalon, MAP4, MHFP6) and physicochemical descriptors (Lipinski, QED, TPSA, Crippen LogP, 3D shape) with explicit choice tables, bit vs count semantics, and partial-charge model selection. Use when featurizing molecules for similarity, QSAR, virtual screening, or ML, or selecting the correct fingerprint for a chemotype-aware task.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Builds and applies 3D pharmacophore models using RDKit Pharm3D, the apo2ph4 receptor-based workflow (Heider et al 2022/2023 J Chem Inf Model 63:147-158), Pharmer / Pharmit (search), and PharmacoForge (diffusion-based generation, Flynn et al 2025 Front Bioinform), covering ligand-based pharmacophore (from active set alignment) and receptor-based pharmacophore (from binding pocket geometry). Explicit handling of feature types, geometric tolerances, partial matching, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Use when identifying scaffold-hopping candidates, building shape-and-feature search queries, or transferring SAR across chemotypes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Extract applicant details, employment history, income, and references from a rental application form into structured JSON for tenant screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.