Skip to content
cccskills

Results for “elf”

2.3K skills · sorted by relevance

コード変更のセルフレビューを実施する。Triggers on: '/self-review', 'セルフレビュー', 'self-review', 'コードレビューして'

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

masanami/claude-harness5Updated Oct 19, 2026

Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

micsapp/micstec-skills4Updated Mar 20, 2026

Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent2Updated Jun 9, 2026

solo

FreeSummary

Work through one difficult mathematics problem with a single agent, saving established arguments and dead ends as progress notes. Resumes from recorded work after interruptions and writes a self-contained proof file, including any unresolved parts.

  • Work through one difficult mathematics problem
  • Resume a proof attempt after an interruption
  • Record lemmas, reductions, and dead ends
anthropics/claude-plugins-official43.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Draft self-assessments, peer reviews, and feedback for managers using concrete examples of work and collaboration. Organizes achievements around context, actions, and results, matches your writing voice, and flags sections that need more evidence or detail.

  • Prepare an annual or mid-year self-assessment
  • Draft a peer review with specific examples
  • Write constructive feedback for a manager
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

gbrain-upgrade

FreeSummary

Keep gbrain current by checking available updates, summarizing release changes, and applying or deferring upgrades according to configured preferences. Migration instructions take priority when a release requires an operator to supervise the update.

  • Check whether gbrain has an available update
  • Review release changes before upgrading
  • Defer update reminders during ongoing work
garrytan/gbrain31KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

self-eval

FreeSummary

Review completed AI work by scoring task difficulty and execution quality separately. A fixed scoring matrix, arguments for higher and lower ratings, and saved score history help examine weaknesses and detect repetitive scoring patterns across sessions.

  • Evaluate a completed feature implementation
  • Review the quality and coverage of a bug fix
  • Reflect on work completed during a session
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

Support startup AI strategy by comparing API use, fine-tuning—additional training of an existing model—and in-house development. Assess three-year costs, regulatory risk, self-hosting breakeven points, and hiring priorities to inform leadership decisions.

  • Compare API use, fine-tuning, and in-house development
  • Assess regulatory risks for an AI use case
  • Calculate when self-hosting becomes cost-effective
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

add-a-feature

FreeSummary

Manage OpenWork feature releases with feature flags, switches that control access to new behavior. Register features before coding, release them by organization and deployment, prepare a global shutdown option, and remove temporary flags after rollout.

  • Registering a feature before implementation
  • Releasing a feature to selected organizations
  • Separating cloud and self-hosted availability
different-ai/openwork24.2KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Guides migration of existing AI inference workloads to self-hosted GKE, Google’s managed Kubernetes service. Covers requirements, GPU sizing, deployment configuration, model storage, validation, and traffic cutover using gcloud and kubectl.

  • Migrating an existing Cloud Run AI service to GKE
  • Planning a self-hosted replacement for Gemini API inference
  • Sizing GPUs and preparing deployment configuration
google/skills21.4KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Private built-in CCB configuration skill for agentroles.ccb_self. Design, edit, validate, and prepare reloads for .ccb/ccb.config, role bindings, providers, windows, workspaces, tool windows, sidebar, and provider startup inputs. Use only inside ccb_self; non-self agents should delegate CCB config changes to ccb_self.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

SeemSeam/claude_codex_bridge3.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

The four Sanskrit principles: Truth-Self, Knowledge-Self, Bliss-Self, Power-Self. Use when need to understand the operational physics of consciousness.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Microck/ordinary-claude-skills406Updated Sep 7, 2026

Guides comprehensive controller self-assessment covering GDPR Articles 5-49 with scoring methodology and reporting format. Activate when conducting internal reviews or benchmarking maturity. Keywords: self-assessment, controller assessment, compliance questionnaire, scoring.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills313Updated Mar 17, 2026

Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch165Updated Oct 17, 2026

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖:(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读);(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测);(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts);(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申);(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo);(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解:误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化:不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

swaylq/master-skill162Updated Sep 6, 2026

Integrate Audiobookshelf's self-hosted audiobook and podcast server into AI agent workflows. Agents can manage libraries, track listening progress, search metadata, and automate podcast episode downloads through the comprehensive REST API.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

agentskillexchange/skills53Updated Oct 19, 2026

Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

skyf0xx/hedgehog46Updated Oct 18, 2026

Use when gathering requirements for a customer portal, partner community, or self-service Experience Cloud site. Triggers: 'gathering requirements for customer portal', 'planning Experience Cloud site', 'what license for community portal', 'portal user journey mapping', 'self-service requirements'. NOT for building the site in Experience Builder — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. NOT for designing the deal-registration and MDF processes themselves — use admin/partner-community-requirements. More trigger keywords: portal persona licence matrix, which Experience Cloud licence do these requirements imply, external user needs a Contact and Account, sharing set vs sharing rule for a portal, self-registration vs SSO for a portal, portal requirements catalogue, handoff to Experience Cloud site setup.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills19Updated Oct 4, 2026

Use this skill when adding external users to an Experience Cloud site, configuring self-registration, managing external user licenses, or customising the login and registration pages. Trigger keywords: add members to community, external user license, self-registration, customer portal login, partner user onboarding, ConfigurableSelfRegHandler. NOT for choosing which external user license to buy — use architect/experience-cloud-licensing-model. Also covers the networkMemberGroups membership block, NetworkMemberGroup assignment status, external-user creation from contacts, offboarding, and LoginHistory diagnosis for site logins. NOT for what records external users can see — use security/experience-cloud-security.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills19Updated Oct 4, 2026

Baut und betreibt ein anbieterneutrales Self-Care-Kernset für geplante LLM-Aufgaben und Desktop-App-Automationen. Ergänzt deterministisches Policy-Linting, Lock- und Modell-Governance, semantische Prompt-Prüfung, konsistente Mehrflächen-Updates, Mini-Checks und Regeldatei-Hygiene. Nutzen, wenn ein Agent seinen nativen Scheduler entdecken oder eine bestehende Automations-Flotte mit Rollback, Readback und Löschschutz kontinuierlich verbessern soll. Löst aus bei automation self-care, Scheduler-Task-Pflege, Desktop-App-Automations-Wartung, Automations-Flotten-Audit, selbstheilende Zeitpläne, core-set-textautomations, basic-text-automations, textbased-automation-core, textbased-automation-drivers, textbased-governance-automations oder textbased-desktopapp-automations.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ellmos-ai/skills8Updated Oct 19, 2026

ELF binary statik analiz — file, strings, objdump, readelf, nm, Ghidra workflow

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MustafaKemal0146/fetih5Updated Oct 11, 2026

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

curiositech/port-daddy3Updated Oct 18, 2026

delivery-gate

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Check learning-log timestamps, free disk space, and shortcut-related phrases before Claude Code ends a session. A Stop hook, which runs when the agent tries to finish, warns or blocks completion according to configured rules without using AI judgment.

  • Checking learning records after complex editing tasks
  • Blocking completion when disk space is critically low
  • Flagging phrases that suggest skipped checks
affaan-m/ECC283.9KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

webgl-experience

FreeSummary

Create full-screen animated visuals with WebGL, a browser technology for GPU rendering. Combine shaders, 3D scenes, or particles with a text overlay, and deliver the result as one self-contained HTML file without external requests.

  • Create a website hero animation
  • Build generative art with a headline
  • Prototype a 3D scene or particle field
nexu-io/open-design102.5KUpdated Oct 19, 2026