Results for “ideation”

Generate project ideas via creative constraints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Choose a named creative method suited to the project and stage of work. Generate, expand, compare, or refine ideas with concrete mechanisms, honest tradeoffs, and at least one practical option with a first step.

• Finding starting ideas for writing or products
• Expanding an existing idea
• Getting unstuck during creative work

Run a brainstorming session with creative techniques suited to a topic and goal. Choose guided questioning, collaborative ideation, or autonomous idea generation, while keeping a session log that supports resuming work after an interruption.

• Exploring ideas for a new project
• Generating ideas through guided questions
• Delegating idea generation to the agent

Develop and prioritize early research ideas through independent brainstorming, structured discussion, evidence checks, and critical review. Keep assumptions, uncertainty, dissent, and scoring reasons visible, then record the human decision and appropriate next steps.

• Exploring candidate directions for a new research topic
• Organizing ideas before a research team discussion
• Comparing proposals using explicit evaluation criteria

Choose research problems, refine new ideas, or rethink stalled projects through structured conversation. Assess feasibility, potential impact, and risks, then develop success criteria, decision points, and backup plans for a clearer research strategy.

• Choosing a thesis research topic
• Assessing risks in a new research idea
• Finding alternatives for a stalled project

Generate improvement ideas for an existing product from product management, design, and engineering perspectives. Produce five ideas per perspective, then select the top five based on goals, potential impact, feasibility, and differentiation, with reasons and assumptions to test.

• Brainstorming features for an existing product
• Exploring solutions to a customer problem
• Comparing ideas from three professional perspectives

Explore features for a new product through product management, design, and engineering perspectives. Generate five ideas from each viewpoint, then select five priorities with reasoning and assumptions to test before developing the concept further.

• Exploring features for a startup idea
• Comparing ideas from three professional perspectives
• Choosing five ideas to validate first

Generate improvement ideas grounded in the project or topic, critique every candidate, and rank the survivors with explanations. Produce a document that helps users choose which ideas deserve further exploration before defining requirements.

• Finding improvement ideas based on the current project
• Exploring unexpected directions for a topic
• Comparing candidates and understanding rejection reasons

Develop solution ideas through repeated rounds of research, cross-domain borrowing, recombination, and evaluation. Receive ranked candidates with feasibility and novelty scores, supporting and opposing arguments, and a record of where each idea came from and how it changed.

• Develop newsletter retention strategies
• Find approaches inspired by other fields
• Combine and refine existing feature ideas

Explore a development idea through probing questions before committing to a plan. The skill can initiate research when needed and route the resulting ideas into GSD notes, tasks, research questions, requirements, or development phases.

• Think through a development idea before planning
• Explore options for an authentication strategy
• Turn an open question into a research topic

Clarify what a product interface should be and what users should accomplish before design or prototyping begins. Ask only about missing information, summarize the brief and assumptions, then continue into the appropriate design workflow.

• Clarifying goals before designing a new interface
• Defining the purpose and scope of a redesign
• Organizing requirements before building from a screenshot

Develop a vague research interest into a specific question and plan. Use 5W1H prompts, literature reviews, and analysis of unanswered questions to define hypotheses, required evidence, suitable methods, and a concrete next step.

• Exploring research ideas with 5W1H prompts
• Reviewing literature to find unanswered questions
• Defining hypotheses and evidence requirements

Organize papers from Zotero into an Obsidian project knowledge base. The skill separates source notes, research synthesis, and writing outputs, requiring evidence records and source links before findings become claims used in later work.

• Organizing Zotero papers into project source notes
• Connecting literature findings to their supporting evidence
• Preparing evidence-linked research writing

Advance one development task by managing an existing pull request, fixing a build failure or bug, or implementing a queued idea. Record the work and integrate changes into auto-dev only after automated checks pass.

• Implementing one queued idea
• Continuing work on an open pull request
• Fixing failed checks or reported bugs

Develop user-visible improvements for cc-wf-studio, verify their basis in the code, and assess their value. Record qualifying proposals as locked GitHub issues, creating a queue of concrete ideas for later implementation without changing code.

• Proposing improvements users would notice
• Checking ideas against code and existing proposals
• Preparing an implementation queue

Find a valuable gap in test coverage by checking code, existing tests, and QA priorities. The skill creates at most one locked GitHub issue with concrete test cases, ready for later implementation.

• Finding past bugs that lack regression tests
• Reviewing recent changes for untested behavior
• Preparing a QA backlog without implementing tests

Turn a research interest into a defined question and practical plan. Use structured brainstorming, literature review, gap analysis, and method comparison to produce a research proposal, organized review, and references, with Zotero support for paper management.

• Develop a research topic using 5W1H
• Organize literature and identify unanswered questions
• Compare research methods and required resources

Turn observations or preliminary data into competing scientific hypotheses grounded in literature. Develop explanations, assess what could disprove them, and produce testable predictions and experimental designs in a structured report with diagrams.

• Develop hypotheses from observations or preliminary data
• Compare competing explanations for a phenomenon
• Define predictions that could disprove a hypothesis

Interactive system flow tracing across CODE, API, AUTH, DATA, NETWORK layers with SQLite persistence and Mermaid export. Use for security audits, compliance documentation, flow tracing, feature ideation, brainstorming, debugging, architecture reviews, or incident post-mortems. Triggers on audit, trace flow, document flow, security review, debug flow, brainstorm, architecture review, post-mortem, incident review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Parallel divergent ideation for coding agents. Spawns N isolated branches under different cognitive frames (regulator, biology, speedrunner, 10-year-old, $0 budget), scores, clusters, prunes traps, and deepens top survivors. Use on /adhd, "ADHD mode", brainstorm/ideate intents, or open-ended design, architecture, naming, API/SDK surface, and fuzzy-debugging decisions. Skip for syntax, lookups, bugs with known root cause, or closed phrasing ("quick", "standard", "canonical", "textbook"). Full pre-flight gate is in the skill body.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting — use for ideation and exploration

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Open-ended scientific ideation partner. Use for research gaps, mechanism exploration, interdisciplinary connections, assumptions, possible research directions, and lightweight literature matrix or A+B paper-combination idea mapping. For structured testable hypotheses and validation plans, use hypothesis-generation instead.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.