Results for “injection”

Detects and prevents code injection attacks targeting serverless functions (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) through event source poisoning, malicious layer injection, runtime command execution, and IAM privilege escalation via function modification. The analyst combines static analysis of function code, CloudTrail event correlation, runtime behavior monitoring, and IAM policy auditing to identify injection vectors across the expanded serverless attack surface including API Gateway, S3, SQS, DynamoDB Streams, and CloudWatch event triggers. Activates for requests involving Lambda security assessment, serverless injection detection, function event poisoning analysis, or serverless privilege escalation investigation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Investigate prompt injection in sandboxed security challenges by tracing how untrusted text changes an agent’s decisions or tool calls. Build a minimal reproduction and preserve evidence showing where external content crosses into trusted instructions or actions.

• Trace instructions hidden in retrieved documents
• Investigate agent behavior changed by stored memory
• Reproduce altered tool arguments or secret exposure

Connect CommunityToolkit.Mvvm ViewModels to Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection, which supplies their required services. Get guidance on startup setup, instance lifetimes, messaging, view integration, and replacing dependencies in tests across supported .NET user interface frameworks.

• Set up dependency injection in a new XAML app
• Choose shared or per-page service instances
• Diagnose missing service registration errors

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for HTML injection", "inject HTML into web pages", "perform HTML injection attacks", "deface web applications", or "test content injection vulnerabilities". It provides comprehensive HTML injection attack techniques and testing methodologies.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized operating system command injection testing, including direct injection, blind injection, out-of-band callbacks, and argument injection. Use when a task belongs to the command injection domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized general injection testing outside SQL injection, including NoSQL, LDAP, XPath, and expression language injection. Use when a task belongs to the general injection domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Threat-model and harden AI agents, RAG systems, assistants, and tool-using workflows against direct, indirect, stored, cross-agent, and multimodal prompt injection. Use when reviewing an agent architecture, isolating untrusted content, constraining tools and egress, protecting secrets, adding injection-focused tests, investigating a suspected injection incident, or documenting residual prompt-injection risk.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Detect and exploit SQL injection vulnerabilities using both manual techniques and automated tools. Use this skill when testing web applications for database injection flaws including UNION-based, error-based, blind boolean, blind time-based, and out-of-band SQL injection. Covers WAF bypass, second-order SQLi, authentication bypass, and full database extraction with sqlmap.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Test for indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities where malicious instructions are injected through external data sources (websites, emails, documents, database records) that the LLM processes. Use this skill when assessing LLM-integrated applications that process user-generated content, retrieve web pages, parse emails, or read documents. Covers injection via web content, email bodies, user profiles, and database records that are fed to LLM context.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Identify and exploit OS Command Injection vulnerabilities where web applications insecurely pass user input into system shell commands. Use this skill when applications feature ping utilities, file conversions, network diagnostics, or PDF generators to execute arbitrary system commands and achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for HTML injection", "inject HTML into web pages", "perform HTML injection attacks", "deface web applications", or "test content injection vulnerabilities". It provides comprehensive HTML injection attack techniques and testing methodologies.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tespit etme (s) and prevents code injection attacks targeting serverless functions (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) through event source poisoning, malicious layer injection, runtime command execution, and IAM privilege escalation via function modification. The analyst combines static analysis of function code, CloudTrail event correlation, runtime behavior monitoring, and IAM policy auditing to identify injection vectors across the expanded serverless attack surface including AP...

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tespit etme (s) prompt injection attacks targeting LLM-based applications using a multi-layered defense combining regex pattern matching for known attack signatures, heuristic scoring for structural anomalies, and transformer-based classification with DeBERTa models. The tespit etme (or) analyzes user inputs before they reach the LLM, flagging direct injections (system prompt overrides, role-play escapes, instruction hijacking) and indirect injections (encoded payloads, multi-language obfuscation, delimiter-...

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for HTML injection", "inject HTML into web pages", "perform HTML injection attacks", "deface web applications", or "test content injection vulnerabilities". It provides comprehensive HTML injection attack techniques and testing methodologies.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Build a screening pipeline for web pages, PDFs, and images before an AI agent reads them. Extract hidden text, check for malicious instructions with detection models, and record decisions to block or allow content.

• Screening external content before an agent reads it
• Checking uploaded PDFs and images for hidden instructions
• Scanning documents before adding them to a knowledge base

Analyze Apache and Nginx access logs for attack attempts, scanner activity, and repeated login requests. Add geographic context to source IP addresses and produce a prioritized findings report to support intrusion investigations and monitoring reviews.

• Investigating suspicious requests in web access logs
• Finding injection attempts and unauthorized file access attempts
• Identifying scanners and repeated login attempts

Design controlled failure experiments for distributed systems to examine how services recover. Produce failure injection scripts, monitoring plans, rollback procedures, and exercise guides, then turn findings into documented improvements.

• Planning controlled failure experiments
• Testing recovery after Kubernetes Pod failures
• Checking service behavior under network delays

Assess security weaknesses in CI/CD systems that automate software builds and delivery. Covering GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab CI, and Azure DevOps, the skill examines unsafe inputs, excessive permissions, exposed credentials, and tampered build outputs, alongside detection and defensive controls.

• Reviewing workflow inputs and execution triggers
• Assessing pipeline permissions and credential exposure
• Checking build artifact handoffs for tampering risks

Argus — the all-seeing scanner suite. Six automated scanners for high-value web + LLM bug classes — CORS misconfiguration (origin reflection / null / credentialed read), CRLF & host-header injection, NoSQL injection (operator auth-bypass / $where blind), JWT attacks (alg:none / RS256→HS256 confusion / secret crack), out-of-band confirmation of blind SSRF/XXE/SQLi/RCE/Log4Shell via interactsh, and an LLM red-team corpus (prompt-injection / jailbreak / system-prompt leak / exfil / indirect injection). Use when a target exposes a JSON API, a login endpoint, JWT auth, a parameter that might reach the server, a chatbot/agent, or any endpoint suspected of a blind/out-of-band bug.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration via tool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling (Unicode Tags block U+E0000-U+E007F, invisible to humans, decoded by the model), tool-use exfiltration (model has fetch/browse tool, attacker injects OOB URL, model exfils chat history/secrets), markdown-image zero-click exfil, system-prompt extraction, IDOR-via-AI (cross-tenant data). Targets: chatbots, RAG, summarizers, agentic copilots, MCP tools. Detection: any LLM-backed endpoint, doc upload triggering AI processing, autonomous agent with tools. Validate: OOB/Collaborator callback for exfil, verbatim-reproducible system-prompt leak (run twice), verifiable cross-tenant leak or RCE. Confabulation is NOT a finding. Use when hunting AI features, chatbots, RAG, agentic systems, MCP.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Comprehensive guide for dependency injection (DI) in Golang. Covers why DI matters (testability, loose coupling, separation of concerns, lifecycle management), manual constructor injection, and DI library comparison (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do). Use this skill when designing service architecture, setting up dependency injection, refactoring tightly coupled code, managing singletons or service factories, or when the user asks about inversion of control, service containers, or wiring dependencies in Go. For a specific DI library, → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx`, or `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do` skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Plans, builds, runs, and analyzes fault injection experiments with AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) to validate application resilience through chaos engineering. Covers experiment templates (actions, targets, stop conditions), the FIS actions catalog and action selection, the scenario library (AZ power interruption, cross-Region connectivity, EC2/EKS/EBS stress), experiment lifecycle and monitoring, logging and reports, multi-account experiments, the experiment IAM role, and blast-radius safety. Applies when a user mentions AWS FIS or fault injection, asks what experiment to run for a failure mode (AZ, Region, API errors/throttling, instance/pod/DB/cache failure, latency, packet loss), wants to author an experiment template or CLI/CloudFormation, or needs to safely run chaos experiments in pre-production or production. For the broader resilience program across Resilience Hub and ARC, see aws-resilience-lifecycle; for ARC routing controls and zonal shift, see recovery-controller-setup.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LLM prompt injection playbook. Use when testing AI/LLM applications for direct injection, indirect injection via RAG/browsing, tool abuse, data exfiltration, MCP security risks, and defense bypass techniques.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.