1.7K skills · sorted by relevance
Plan and coordinate Strix security assessments across source code, running applications, APIs, and continuous integration pipelines. Combine findings into one prioritized remediation plan based on demonstrated impact, removing duplicates and documenting gaps in test coverage.
Combine laboratory animal welfare measurements into reference-relative RELSA severity scores. Analyze individual trajectories, explore forecasts for specified observation times, and derive candidate score zones, with explicit checks on normalization, reference selection, prediction intervals, and evaluation limits.
Plan and coordinate an authorized security assessment across reconnaissance, access testing, privilege escalation, and reporting. Route work to specialist skills, review each stage, and adjust the assessment path within the agreed scope.
Draft self-assessments, peer reviews, and feedback for managers using concrete examples of work and collaboration. Organizes achievements around context, actions, and results, matches your writing voice, and flags sections that need more evidence or detail.
Organize EU AI Act compliance work with references to Articles and Annexes. Classify AI systems by risk, plan conformity assessments that check regulatory requirements, prepare technical documentation checklists, and map obligations and deadlines to organizational roles.
Implement Mamba, a model architecture that processes sequences through an internal state with computation scaling linearly with input length. Covers pretrained text generation, Mamba-1 and Mamba-2 configuration, speed comparisons with Transformers, and GPU memory troubleshooting.
Create a detailed legal risk assessment for a feature that needs closer review. Describe potential harm, likelihood, severity, and safeguards, then compare practical options and recommend a path in a standalone document for decisionmakers.
Runs and interprets AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments. Covers starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings. Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings, or understand failure modes, or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it. Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Designing quizzes, personality assessments, and recommendation tools that segment users into actionable categories rather than generating clicks for clicks' sake. Question architecture, scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation mapping, lead capture integration. Honest about clickbait-quiz (engagement only), vanity-result (entertaining, not useful), and actionable-segmentation (genuine categorization that drives next-step recommendations) patterns. Triggers on quiz, assessment, personality test, recommendation tool, scorecard, diagnostic, fit evaluator, what-type-of-X-are-you, persona quiz. Also triggers when an audience needs a categorization-driven lead magnet, when a vanity quiz is producing engagement but no qualified leads, or when an assessment is being scoped for the first time.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment. This skill should be used when the user asks to "do a quick AI Act assessment", "check if the AI Act applies to us", "run a preliminary classification", "do an AI Act triage", "quick check", "preliminary assessment", "Schnellprüfung", "Ersteinschätzung", or needs a fast initial assessment before committing to full analysis.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers assessment of third country legal frameworks, supplementary measures evaluation, and TIA scoring. Activate for international data transfers, SCCs, third-country adequacy, or Chapter V compliance. Keywords: TIA, Schrems II, transfer assessment, EDPB, supplementary measures, SCCs, international transfer.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for vendor and third-party data processing arrangements. Covers processor due diligence, Data Processing Agreement (DPA) requirements under GDPR Article 28, sub-processor management, cross-border vendor transfers, cloud service provider assessments, and ongoing vendor monitoring. Keywords: vendor PIA, processor assessment, DPA, Article 28, sub-processor, cloud privacy, third-party risk.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides privacy program maturity assessment using the AICPA/CIPT Privacy Maturity Model with five levels: Ad Hoc, Repeating, Defined, Managed, and Optimized. Covers assessment methodology across ten privacy domains, scoring criteria, gap analysis, maturity roadmap generation, and benchmarking against industry peers. Keywords: privacy maturity, AICPA, maturity model, assessment, roadmap, benchmarking.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides systematic assessment of current state versus GDPR requirements across all chapters with prioritised remediation matrix. Activate when starting compliance programmes or conducting periodic reassessment. Keywords: gap analysis, compliance assessment, remediation matrix, GDPR readiness.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides the end-to-end GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment process under Article 35, including mandatory trigger identification per Art. 35(3), DPIA content requirements per Art. 35(7), and EDPB WP248rev.01 methodology. Activate for systematic profiling, large-scale special category processing, or large-scale public monitoring. Keywords: DPIA, Article 35, impact assessment, WP248, data protection, risk assessment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.