Skip to content
cccskills

Results for “prd”

549 skills · sorted by relevance

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

kesslernity/awesome-copilot-agent-skills8Updated Sep 19, 2026

Generates a BACKPRESSURE.md file for any project. Analyzes codebase and PRD to produce deterministic self-verification checks that AI coding agents run on their own output.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

muratcankoylan/BACKPRESSURE8Updated Feb 18, 2026

Document templates for all pipeline output documents — specs, indexes, reports, and strategy docs. Use when any workflow needs to produce a structured document.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity6Updated Aug 16, 2026

Per-surface tech stack decision tables and development tooling options. Use during /create-prd-stack to present constraint-filtered options to the user.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity6Updated Aug 16, 2026

Compile architecture draft into dated architecture design and engineering standards with rubric-complete quality gates

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity6Updated Aug 16, 2026

Define system architecture, error architecture, and data strategy with map guards and ideation context reload

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity6Updated Aug 16, 2026

Define security, attack surface, integration, and observability architecture with compliance escalation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity6Updated Aug 16, 2026

Create structured docs from scratch — PRDs, technical specs, design docs, decision records, knowledge bases. Use when drafting documentation, writing proposals, defining requirements, or planning features.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS6Updated Sep 8, 2026

Project workflow for PRDs, task tracking, changelog sync, and documentation updates. Use for any non-trivial task that spans multiple steps, touches several files, changes architecture, or needs project tracking updates. Also activates with @update to sync task.md, changelog.md, and files.md after completing work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

waynesutton/teleprompter5Updated Jun 28, 2026

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Agistra/agistra.dev5Updated Oct 14, 2026

Comprehensive toolkit for product managers including RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, and go-to-market strategies. Use for feature prioritization, user research synthesis, requirement documentation, and product strategy development.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

AxelMrak/ai5Updated Feb 20, 2026

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

AxelMrak/ai5Updated Feb 20, 2026

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test4Updated Sep 4, 2026

review

Free

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test4Updated Sep 4, 2026

Implement a piece of work based on a PRD or set of issues.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

0xAidan/polymarket-bot-test4Updated Sep 4, 2026

Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

Product manager for PRD creation and requirements discovery. Use when the user asks to talk to Nicole or requests the product manager.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

stellar-zk/stellar-zk4Updated Oct 19, 2026

Tests genotype-environment associations and identifies adaptive loci while correcting for the four-confound landscape (structure, demography, background selection, sampling design) using LFMM2 with mandatory K via sNMF cross-entropy elbow (LEA 3), BayPass Core/AUX/C2/IS with Omega covariance matrix, RDA / pRDA for polygenic adaptation (Forester 2018; requires imputed genotypes), OutFLANK with trimmed FST null, pcadapt, gradient forests (Ellis-Smith-Pitcher 2012, NOT mis-cited Ellis-Manel), Capblancq & Forester 2021 RDA Swiss-army-knife, genomic-offset prediction with Lind & Lotterhos 2025 three-regime caveat, Lotterhos-Whitlock sampling optima, Wang & Bradburd 2014 IBD vs IBE, and Circuitscape + ResistanceGA. Use when identifying adaptive loci across gradients, choosing K for LFMM2, deciding among GEA methods, predicting maladaptation with the novel-environment caveat, distinguishing IBD vs IBE, or optimizing sampling design.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 18, 2026

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 18, 2026

Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 18, 2026

Project workflow for PRDs, task tracking, changelog sync, and documentation updates. Use for any non-trivial task that spans multiple steps, touches several files, changes architecture, or needs project tracking updates. Also activates with @update to sync task.md, changelog.md, and files.md after completing work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

waynesutton/finder93Updated May 24, 2026

Hand-drawn paper-wireframe template — white paper background, monochromatic ink palette, SVG turbulence "wobble" filters for pen-quiver authenticity, handwritten fonts (Caveat / Kalam / Ma Shan Zheng / Long Cang), wavy dividers, sketch-rect overlays, marginalia annotations. For PRD illustrations, IA flow docs, low-fidelity layout exploration, "draft / not final" stakeholder communication. Three skeletons (single-page editorial / app multi-screen flow / IA sitemap) — pick one up front based on the artifact, do NOT inherit only the brush strokes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WyvernCW/Monich3Updated Jun 20, 2026

Independent, traceable code review of one SDD Composy task in review_required against its approved PRD, stories, TechSpec, evidence, and project rules, with stable findings and severities. Use when a task passed QA and evidence — 'revisar a TASK-003', 'code review da task', 'review this task's diff'. Do NOT use for code review outside an SDD workspace (use the host code review), for QA (sdd-qa), or for verification (sdd-verify).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace3Updated Oct 15, 2026