Results for “architecture analysis”

Analyze any GitHub repository in AI-friendly format. Convert entire repos to single markdown documents, generate architecture diagrams with Mermaid, inspect structure trees, language breakdowns, and recent activity. Includes GitHub URL tricks, API shortcuts, and advanced search techniques. Read-only analysis — never executes code from repositories. Built for AI agents — Python stdlib only, no dependencies. Use for repository analysis, code architecture review, open source research, GitHub intelligence, repo documentation, and codebase understanding.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Perform a deep architectural analysis or security review requiring extended reasoning. Use for complex architecture decisions, security audits, or when standard analysis is not finding the root cause.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design Azure infrastructure using natural language, or analyze existing Azure resources to auto-generate architecture diagrams, refine them through conversation, and deploy with Bicep. When to use this skill: - "Create X on Azure", "Set up a RAG architecture" (new design) - "Analyze my current Azure infrastructure", "Draw a diagram for rg-xxx" (existing analysis) - "Foundry is slow", "I want to reduce costs", "Strengthen security" (natural language modification) - Azure resource deployment, Bicep template generation, IaC code generation - Microsoft Foundry, AI Search, OpenAI, Fabric, ADLS Gen2, Databricks, and all Azure services

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Perform 12-Factor Agents compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating agent architecture, reviewing LLM-powered systems, or auditing agentic applications against the 12-Factor methodology.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

アクセス制御分析エージェント - ゼロトラストモデルに基づくアクセス制御の現状分析と移行準備評価。/access-control-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

セキュリティ分析エージェント - 既存システムのセキュリティ状況を分析し、OWASP Top 10対応状況とゼロトラスト準備状況を評価。/security-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

データモデル分析エージェント - 既存のデータモデルを分析し、エンティティ・リレーションシップ・ドメインルールを抽出。/data-model-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ER図分析エージェント - 現行システムのER図を作成し、エンティティ・リレーションシップ・カーディナリティを可視化。/er-diagram-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DB設計分析エージェント - 既存のデータベース設計を分析し、テーブル定義・インデックス・制約・問題点を抽出。/db-design-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design Azure infrastructure using natural language, or analyze existing Azure resources to auto-generate architecture diagrams, refine them through conversation, and deploy with Bicep. When to use this skill: - "Create X on Azure", "Set up a RAG architecture" (new design) - "Analyze my current Azure infrastructure", "Draw a diagram for rg-xxx" (existing analysis) - "Foundry is slow", "I want to reduce costs", "Strengthen security" (natural language modification) - Azure resource deployment, Bicep template generation, IaC code generation - Microsoft Foundry, AI Search, OpenAI, Fabric, ADLS Gen2, Databricks, and all Azure services

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Investigate repository behavior, architecture, or possible causes without changing files. Trace relevant code and supporting material, then rank explanations by evidence and confidence, with concrete file references and clear distinctions between observations, conclusions, and unresolved questions.

• Investigate possible causes of a bug
• Understand behavior across multiple files
• Explain architecture and tradeoffs

Run Gemini CLI to review code, assess technical plans, and analyze large collections of files. Choose a model and execution settings for the task, then capture findings about security, maintainability, architecture, or technical debt.

• Reviewing security and quality across multiple files
• Checking architecture plans for missing components
• Analyzing the structure of a large codebase

Design and implement systems that collect, transform, validate, and store data for analysis. Covers scheduled and real-time processing, data warehouses, quality checks, monitoring, and cost tuning using tools such as Apache Spark, dbt, and Airflow.

• Building scheduled data collection and transformation workflows
• Designing a data warehouse for analysis
• Synchronizing database changes in real time

Stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans by breaking them into individual claims for parallel expert agents to challenge. Receive the strongest supporting case, surviving counterarguments, and findings ranked by severity with suggested ways to address weaknesses.

• Challenge assumptions in a business strategy
• Find weaknesses in a software architecture proposal
• Prepare strong objections to a pricing decision

Prepare a Web3 bug bounty investigation by scoring targets, setting up analysis tools, reviewing past audits, and tracing how funds move. Use the findings to prioritize smart contracts and assess whether suspected issues have concrete impacts.

• Choose a protocol for a bug bounty investigation
• Prepare build, test, and static analysis tools
• Map fund flows and prioritize contract reviews

Review consequential or ambiguous decisions through ten stages of structured reflection. Separate observations from assumptions, examine alternatives and risks, and produce a recommendation supported by evidence, with verification needs and conditions for revisiting the decision.

• Compare options and their tradeoffs
• Review architecture choices and wider effects
• Investigate incidents and challenge assumptions

Read existing code to reconstruct system specifications, including architecture, data flows, APIs, and business rules. Produces documentation tied to code locations, separating observed behavior from inferences and questions that need clarification.

• Understand an undocumented legacy system
• Document existing APIs and business rules
• Map module dependencies and data flows

Develop security design improvements from vulnerability reports, incident documents, source code, or scan results. Compare architectural options with before-and-after diagrams, engineering tradeoffs, and migration plans to support a concrete design decision.

• Find structural causes shared by several vulnerabilities
• Compare security architecture options and costs
• Explain proposed changes with before-and-after diagrams

Build a documented understanding of unfamiliar code before a security audit. It records function assumptions, guarantees, dependencies, and open questions, producing a dossier and individual function notes to support later vulnerability analysis.

• Understanding unfamiliar code before an audit
• Mapping dependencies for threat modeling
• Preparing background notes for an architecture review

Develop security design improvements from vulnerability reports, incident documents, source code, or scan results. Compare architectural options with before-and-after diagrams, engineering tradeoffs, and migration plans to support a concrete design decision.

• Find structural causes shared by several vulnerabilities
• Compare security architecture options and costs
• Explain proposed changes with before-and-after diagrams

Examine strategy, design, and difficult decisions through AI personas modeled on thinkers and engineers. The skill selects a panel, checks how members frame the problem, gathers independent analyses, and assigns a separate chair to synthesize a verdict.

• Compare software architecture options
• Examine market entry and pricing strategies
• Review assumptions and blind spots in a decision