Results for “executor”

Delegate tasks to ANY CLI agent (claude, codex, aider, ...) running in a detached tmux session, with a race-safe done-signal protocol and multi-turn iteration. Use when delegating work to a non-Claude CLI agent, when the user says "tmux delegate", "run agent in tmux", "delegate to codex/aider", or when executor work should run in an observable background terminal instead of the Agent tool.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Build, run, debug, and operate applications on AWS Lambda MicroVMs — Firecracker-isolated, snapshot-resumable serverless compute environments that run inside a container with up to 8-hour lifetimes. Triggers on: Lambda MicroVMs, Firecracker isolation, snapshot-resumable compute, suspend/resume, sandboxed or untrusted code execution, AI/agent code-execution sandboxes, interactive code playgrounds and notebooks (Jupyter, REPLs), reinforcement-learning environments, multi-tenant CI executors and build runners, sessionful game or simulation servers, isolated security scanners, long-lived sessions, or port-listening servers (gRPC, WebSocket, custom TCP). For standard event-driven Lambda functions, use the aws-lambda skill instead.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Split the Plan/Act/Verify loop across three model tiers — frontier planner, cheap executor, frontier judge — via env vars read by run.sh.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

使用 Gaussian 软件执行量子化学计算，包括 DFT 结构优化、频率分析和单点能计算。生成 .log 和 .chk 文件，并将所有输出打包为 zip 压缩包。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Execute exactly one eligible Unit in an existing research Workspace; use for stepwise or manual semantic execution when status, Attempt, Artifact, Manifest, checkpoint, and acceptance evidence must remain synchronized.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Transfer full task ownership to a fresh agent with a verified brief and explicit release. Use for replacing the current executor, including a directly assigned task with no work card; not for supervising a helper.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Register this agent and terminal with Reach for cards, calls and wake-ups. Use when asked to join, connect, or become reachable, or when a manually opened agent lacks `SNO_EXECUTOR_ADDR`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Write, revise or review a charter: the one document that tells an executor what to deliver, what is out of bounds, what the owner already decided, and how each success check will be proven. Use when work needs a written brief before someone else does it, or when asked to write, change or check a charter.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Carry out a released charter to a proven result: plan only as much as the work needs, do the work through the project's own workers, prove every success check with a recorded real run, get one independent review, and close honestly. Invoke explicitly as `$deliver <charter>` (Codex) or `/deliver <charter>` (Claude, Cursor), or the way your agent invokes a skill, or when a dispatch names you the executor of a charter.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MANUAL-ONLY: load solely when the human owner types `/cos`, uses `$cos`, or asks you to act as the Chief of Staff (COS). The COS is the one agent the owner talks to; it coordinates the owner and the per-project Project Leads (PLs). A task card, charter, or dispatch makes you an executor, not COS.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PL (Project Lead) role sub-skill for supervising in-flight executors. Loaded ONLY through the pl core routing table; NEVER auto-load from context, never invoke directly.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Execute Python code in a safe sandboxed environment via [inference.sh](https://inference.sh). Pre-installed: NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, requests, BeautifulSoup, Selenium, Playwright, MoviePy, Pillow, OpenCV, trimesh, and 100+ more libraries. Use for: data processing, web scraping, image manipulation, video creation, 3D model processing, PDF generation, API calls, automation scripts. Triggers: python, execute code, run script, web scraping, data analysis, image processing, video editing, 3D models, automation, pandas, matplotlib

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Decision protocol for the map-reduce / dynamic fan-out pattern in LM pipelines — "given list L, run f(item) for each item in parallel, then combine". Activates when the coder agent is about to process N items with N LM calls (per-doc summarize, per-query retrieve, per-candidate rank, parallel tool fan-out). Encodes the *when*, *how many at once*, *what to do when one fails*, and *how to reduce* — not the API of any single framework. Cross-framework: LangGraph `Send`, CrewAI parallel tasks / Flow, `asyncio.gather`, `ThreadPoolExecutor`, LlamaIndex batch retrieval.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Patterns and best practices for integrating ROS2 systems with web technologies including REST APIs, WebSocket bridges, and browser-based robot interfaces. Use this skill when building web dashboards for robots, streaming camera feeds to browsers, exposing ROS2 services as REST endpoints, or implementing bidirectional WebSocket communication between web UIs and ROS2 nodes. Trigger whenever the user mentions rosbridge, rosbridge_suite, roslibjs, FastAPI with ROS2, Flask with rclpy, WebSocket for robot telemetry, MJPEG streaming, WebRTC for robots, REST API wrapping ROS2 services, web-based robot control, browser robot interface, robot dashboard, CORS configuration for robots, or any web-to-ROS2 bridge pattern. Also trigger for authentication on robot web interfaces, rate limiting sensor streams, video streaming from robot cameras to browsers, or running async web frameworks alongside the ROS2 executor. Covers rosbridge_suite, FastAPI, Flask, WebSocket, and WebRTC approaches.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Provides and generates LangChain4j tool and function calling patterns: annotates methods as tools with @Tool, configures tool executors, registers tools with AiServices, validates tool parameters, and handles tool execution errors. Use when building AI agents that call tools, define function specifications, manage tool responses, or integrate external APIs with LLM-driven applications.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Diagram design reference library (14 types — architecture, flowchart, sequence, state, ER, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, nested, tree, org chart, layers, venn, pyramid). In ppt-master this is consumed by the Executor when hand-authoring diagram-type SVG pages — it is NOT a standalone HTML generator here. Read for deep per-type layout conventions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt. Use with inherited history or an explicitly identified source; no particular planning, testing, or review skill is required.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions through Codex Task Messenger, validate the returned receipt, and archive a completed child. The source may come from any planning workflow. Requires Codex App task tools and codex-task-messenger.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.