94 skills · sorted by relevance
Run all code quality checks (security, complexity, test coverage) on the current PR and post a combined report as a GitHub PR comment. Use before merging a PR, during code review, or when asked to check code quality.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
[Code Quality] Use when evaluating received review feedback, reviewing named code on request, or verifying a completion claim. Current diffs: changes-review; rationale: why-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
[Git] Use when generating developer KPI, contribution, effort point, man-day or code-quality reports from git history.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Namespace router → maintenance and code-quality chore skills. Use to pick the chore intent before invoking the matched concrete skill directly.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Load for pre-PR self-review or pull-request review that must verify the matched intent, allowed scope, required tests/docs, forbidden actions, architecture gates, and merge readiness; not for a general code-quality diff review alone.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run all available tests and linters, check for anti-patterns, and generate a comprehensive code quality report
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Applies standard AI review policy guidelines for midstream (implementation) phase reviews.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
一般コード品質のレビューエージェント。デフォルトのフォールバック先。 可読性、保守性、型安全性、ロギング等の個別スキルへルーティングする。
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Execute code-quality gates for a completed phase including tests, coverage, lint, types, build, CI/CD, staging, migrations, and spec coverage
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Orchestrate phase validation across code-quality and production-readiness gates with mandatory reporting and verdicting
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Map tasks to specialist agents. Use when choosing which agent for a job, comparing agent capabilities, or routing to React/Next.js/Playwright/docs/code-quality experts. Keywords: which agent, best agent for this, delegate to expert, agent capability mapping.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When asynchronously reviewing peer code before merging into the main branch.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Stop AI agents from secretly bypassing your rules. Mechanical enforcement with git hooks, secret detection, deployment verification, and import registries. Born from real production incidents: server crashes, token leaks, code rewrites. Works with Claude Code, Clawdbot, Cursor. Install once, enforce forever.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review a GitHub pull request from multiple perspectives in parallel, output only findings, then let the user pick which to fix in the same session. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, mentions "PRレビュー" / "PR review" with a number, or invokes `/pr-review <number>`. Fans out subagents for absolute-rules, stop-slop, security, architecture, code-quality, testing, and ai-antipattern.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Planktonによる書き込み時コード品質強制 — ファイル編集ごとにフックを介した自動フォーマット、リンティング、Claude駆動の修正。
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Code quality standards for OneKey. Use when fixing lint warnings, running pre-commit tasks, handling unused variables, writing comments, or ensuring code quality. All comments must be in English. Triggers on lint, linting, eslint, oxlint, tsc, type check, unused variable, comment, documentation, spellcheck, code quality, pre-commit, yarn lint.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.