126 skills · sorted by relevance
Design an AI agent around its requirements, or audit an existing agent for architectural problems. Deliver justified decisions, verification plans, and a PDF report with a diagram, covering budgets, permissions, stopping rules, and failure handling.
Turn voice calls into GBrain records containing transcripts, summaries, audio links, and references to people or companies. The workflow also sends summaries to a configured messaging service; automatic processing when calls end requires additional implementation.
Build MCP servers, which let AI agents use external APIs and services through tools. The skill guides tool design, authentication, input validation, implementation, testing, and evaluation using TypeScript or Python.
Review development plans with external AI tools, then revise and review them again while actionable concerns remain. Choose reviewers and a cycle limit to work toward a plan with resolved review findings.
Build and update Convex backend code, including schemas, queries, authentication, storage, and scheduled jobs. Apply input and output validation, indexed data access, and deployment checks to verify the implementation.
Build MCP servers, which let AI agents use external APIs and services through tools. The skill guides tool design, authentication, input validation, implementation, testing, and evaluation using TypeScript or Python.
Guide a bug bounty investigation from scope checks and asset discovery to vulnerability testing, impact validation, and report writing. Covers web applications, source code, and AI features, with an emphasis on reproducible evidence of real harm.
Run a configurable multi-LLM council with personas, budget caps, synthesis, veto gates, and optional implementation handoff.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Delegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Orchestrate a configurable, multi-member CLI planning council (Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, OpenCode, or custom) to produce independent implementation plans, anonymize and randomize them, then judge and merge into one final plan. Use when you need a robust, bias-resistant planning workflow, structured JSON outputs, retries, and failure handling across multiple CLI agents.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when auditing a codebase for semantic duplication - functions that do the same thing but have different names or implementations. Especially useful for LLM-generated codebases where new functions are often created rather than reusing existing ones.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Provides patterns to build declarative AI Services with LangChain4j for LLM integration, chatbot development, AI agent implementation, and conversational AI in Java. Generates type-safe AI services using interface-based patterns, annotations, memory management, and tools integration. Use when creating AI-powered Java applications with minimal boilerplate, implementing conversational AI with memory, or building AI agents with function calling.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this self-contained Browser Use repo skill for Python agents that automate websites, browser sessions, custom tools, LLM/provider setup, persistent CLI sessions, cloud/sandbox production deployment, MCP, skills, and troubleshooting. Prefer ChatBrowserUse by default and route to focused sub-skills for implementation details.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
AI and machine learning workflow covering LLM application development, RAG implementation, agent architecture, ML pipelines, and AI-powered features.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Maintain the pure-Go SQLite password identity store, reusable parser, immutable account evidence, idempotent enrollment, portal injection, and login E2E tests. Excludes local JSON database internals and MFA/profile feature implementation.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Submit a pull request following the repo's contribution guidelines. Reviews the diff, checks for common rejection reasons, and helps the user write their own PR description. The LLM reviews. the user writes. Use when implementation is complete and tests pass. Not for responding to review comments after the PR is open. Use oss-post-pr for that.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Package codebases into LLM-optimized markdown, and run the Deep Think Authority pipeline (context-builder → Deep Think review → structured AUTHORITY → Flash/Antigravity implementation agent). Use when generating project context, preparing Deep Think reviews, or binding a weaker coding agent to a senior reasoning pass.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create distinctive, production-grade frontends by composing design dimensions and tech-specific implementations
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Add technical context, implementation hints, and effort estimates to user stories
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyze and extract relevant patterns, best practices, and usage examples from fetched documentation for implementation guidance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.