1.2K skills · sorted by relevance
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reviewing, debugging, or giving feedback on Go code in this repo (exercises/part2, website/tools, or any *.go file) or when asked for a "code review", "review this Go", "revisa este código Go", or "crítica de código". Reviews for correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, performance, and security, and always ends with a test-thinking pass (what a test would catch). For exercises/part2, prefer the go-exercise-reviewer skill which knows the module-mode quirk; this skill covers general Go anywhere in the repo.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
act is an open-source CLI tool that runs GitHub Actions workflows locally using Docker, enabling fast feedback on workflow changes without pushing to GitHub. It is a standard tool for local Actions development and testing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Expert support operations guidance for customer service excellence. Use when designing ticket management systems, creating SLA policies, building support tier structures (L1/L2/L3), optimizing knowledge bases, defining severity levels and escalation procedures, implementing support metrics (CSAT, FRT, TTR, FCR), configuring support tool stacks, or building support-to-CS feedback loops. Covers Zendesk, Intercom, Freshdesk, and help desk best practices.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run clippy locally and report only issues in the current diff, matching the CI reviewdog flow. Use when asked how to lint changed code or get clippy feedback on a branch before pushing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
OctoClaw is the TypeScript-first policy, delegation, status, and operator layer for OpenClaw. Use it when a turn should be routed through reply/delegate policy, WorkContract-backed delegation, runtime status, IM delivery, or feedback-loop tooling.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user says 'send this to my client', 'get feedback on this page', 'send a review link', 'what did the client say', or 'work through the review notes'. Sends a Murmur review link, reads the notes reviewers pin to the page, replies, applies each change on a duplicate, and resolves every note with the snapshot of the change.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a hover/press effect", "animate a toggle or switch", "build an animated like button", "make a toast/snackbar slide in", "animate a drawer or modal", "animate list reordering or add/remove", "do a shared-element layout transition", or "polish UI feedback". Covers UI motion with Framer Motion (motion/react) and modern CSS.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Scores and strengthens startup pitch decks (pre-seed through Series A) against 35 investor-grade criteria grounded in Sequoia, DocSend, YC, a16z, and Carta data. Use when the user has shared a pitch deck (PDF, PPTX, markdown, pasted slide text, or a link to one) and asks for a review, score, feedback, or critique. A full review takes about 15–25 minutes, 40 or more for a long investor deck, so for a general pitch question with no deck, answer briefly in chat and offer the review instead of starting it. When it runs, score with the rubric, never with deck advice from memory.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Coordinates roadshow scheduling with institutional investor targeting, presentation materials, and feedback tracking. Use when managing roadshows, organizing investor meetings, or tracking investor engagement.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Report a problem with the open-pr plugin itself, or ask for a change, on its public issue tracker. Use when a run of one of its commands left something to say. Takes no URL.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Add or refine depth through elevation systems, raised and inset surfaces, layered overlap, and meaningful shadow behavior so interfaces feel structured instead of flat. Use when the user mentions depth, elevation, shadows, layering, flat cards, pressed states, drag feedback, or inset controls.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Unit testing patterns with Vitest - mocking, fixtures, isolation, and fast feedback.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create and maintain a product or project backlog with prioritized items, acceptance criteria, and estimates. Covers user story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, backlog grooming, item splitting, and status tracking. Use when starting a new project and converting scope into actionable items, during ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback or scope changes, or splitting oversized items into implementable pieces.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.