1.2K skills · sorted by relevance
Re-evaluate auto-review findings against the original order's intent. Filters out findings that bend the intent to reduce scope. Use after Document Workflow auto-review completes (step 5→6), or when review feedback feels like it's distorting the original goal.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Convex UI component patterns from the live Storybook preview. Use when building React components, forms, modals, navigation, feedback states, or app layouts that should match the current Convex design system. Applies to both shared primitives and dashboard style product UI.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Convex UI component patterns from the live Storybook preview. Use when building React components, forms, modals, navigation, feedback states, or app layouts that should match the current Convex design system. Applies to both shared primitives and dashboard style product UI.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Simulates academic peer review, evaluating papers across Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing to provide Major/Minor Revision recommendations with actionable feedback. Triggers when a user asks to "review my paper," "simulate peer review," or "give my paper a peer review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Implement a phishing report button in email clients with automated triage workflow that analyzes user-reported suspicious emails and provides feedback to reporters.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Synthesises training survey responses and manager notes into a DRAFT training needs report by role: coded needs with record counts per role (n of N), the evidence type behind each count, anonymised quotes cited to record codes, disagreements between what staff report and what managers observe, gaps where a role is under-represented or a required skill has no evidence, and follow-up questions to settle before any course is designed. Never rates an individual, ranks a team or turns a count into a competence verdict. Use when the user asks to "analyse this training survey", "what training do our teams need", "summarise the manager feedback on skills gaps", "build a training needs analysis by role" or "which roles have the biggest skill gaps". Do not use for turning an agreed need into a course, use course-outline-builder instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Builds a DRAFT change-communication plan from a change description: audience map, key messages per audience traced to the description, channels, sequence with dates or day offsets, owners, feedback loop and open questions, plus drafts of the first messages for the sponsor to approve. Use when the user asks to "plan the comms for this change", "who needs to hear about this and when", "draft the announcement sequence", "build a communication plan for the rollout", "write the first message to managers about this change" or "how do we tell people about this". Do not use for a clause-by-clause comparison of a changed HR policy with its previous version, use policy-change-briefing instead; for a new hire's first weeks, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Coach German writing and conversation with minimal corrections, persistent root-cause mistake tracking (FehlerDNA), mistake-based spaced repetition with a new sentence every time, roleplay whose words return in spaced reviews, continuing preparation for real-life goals across sessions, and an honest progress profile. Use for German correction, personalized review, vocabulary, progress, roleplay, or preparation for an interview, presentation, appointment, or other concrete event; do not use for translation-only requests without learning or feedback.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Watch incoming feedback from outside engineers on your open-source repos: comments, reviews, issues, mentions. Use when you need to find who replied to your pull requests or issues, triage human versus bot responses, and answer within a day with evidence.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill when you need to review presentation materials from an audience perspective to improve their quality and effectiveness. Evaluates content clarity, visual design, logical flow, engagement factors, and Marp technical compatibility. Triggers include "review my presentation", "check my slides", "presentation feedback", or when a user has completed a draft presentation and wants comprehensive quality review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
フィードバック運用（作成・同期・分類・リンク・クローズ・フラグ解消）。GitHub Issueの作成または既存フィードバックの取り込みワークフローを実行する。
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Load for Senior CTO critique, architectural audit, risk review, sequencing correction, or refinement of an existing implementation-plan triad; edits the requested plan/context/tasks in place without creating a worktree or review file. Not for open-ended CTO advice, product implementation, or implementation workspace setup.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Conclusion Key takeaways Agent reflection is a feedback loop where AI agents critique their own outp
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Verweist auf das öffentliche, anbieterneutrale Modul build-your-users-mind: ein datenschutzbewusstes Verfahren zum Aufbau eines empirischen Theory-of-Mind-Präferenzmodells eines autorisierten Nutzers aus dessen eigenen Interaktionsprotokollen. Verwenden, wenn eine zuständige Person ein Entscheidungsavatar-Profil erstellen, validieren, anbinden oder pflegen möchte, ohne das persönliche Profil oder seine Belege zu veröffentlichen.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when designing interface states, feedback, hover/focus/press, gestures, direct manipulation, navigation transitions, loading/error/empty behavior, or deciding where interaction should carry the design concept.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Read the latest Glassbox code review and apply all feedback annotations
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan and run product or feature launches from positioning and tiering through asset readiness, launch-day orchestration, feedback and momentum.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy, or refresh outdated content. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' 'sharpen the messaging,' 'refresh this content,' 'update this page,' 'this content is outdated,' or 'content audit.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved or refreshed rather than rewritten from scratch. For writing new copy, see copywriting.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks to "design an early access program", "set up a waitlist and beta stages", or "define beta graduation criteria"; produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder with per-stage purpose and opt-in semantics, quantified graduation criteria per stage (labeled Estimated), a cohort-gating and invite-throttling plan, tester recruitment with launch-day social-proof prep, a feedback-loop spec where every status change notifies its subscribers, and a referral-loop mechanism spec (invite codes, anti-abuse). Not for waitlist acquisition strategy or the capture-flow spec — use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry. waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.