297 skills · sorted by relevance
Battle-tested Playwright patterns for E2E, API, component, visual, accessibility, and security testing. Covers locators, assertions, fixtures, network mocking, auth flows, debugging, and framework recipes for React, Next.js, Vue, and Angular. TypeScript and JavaScript.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification, suite lifecycle, and advanced patterns like Eventually, JSONEq, and custom matchers. Apply when the codebase imports github.com/stretchr/testify.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
[omh] Testing an internal control -- SOX, ICFR or ITGC: define the population and the sample, name the evidence that proves each item, re-perform the control, and grade any deficiency from stated likelihood, magnitude and compensating-control criteria, never by assertion. Use when the user says: internal-audit, internal audit, internal control, internal controls, internal control audit, control testing, test of controls, tests of controls.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', reviewing a small diff you don't trust, or a brief that asserts something about existing code ('make X public', 'X already handles Y') before you design against that assertion.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Connects AI agents to remote Windows desktop applications on Amazon WorkSpaces Applications (AppStream 2.0) through the managed Agent Access MCP server, and guides reliable desktop automation. Covers connecting an agent to the MCP endpoint (SigV4, streaming URL, and Active Directory SAML/Domain Join), BLOCKING vs POLLING connect modes, the computer-use tools (screenshot, click, type, key, scroll), screenshot-budget and action-batching discipline, MCP tool forwarding (forwarded___ tools), session lifecycle and expire-on-delete, and troubleshooting connection errors. Use when building or debugging an agent that drives a remote Windows desktop or GUI application via WorkSpaces Applications / AppStream — including "dcv session not ready", "client_disconnected", 400 signing-region, POLLING/connection_status, SAML assertion, or forwarded tool questions. Not for Amazon WorkSpaces Personal/Core virtual desktops or general AppStream fleet administration unrelated to agent access.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Deploy an Alchemy-backed service through environment-scoped credentials, chain assertions, canaries, and rollback gates. Use when promoting an integration to hosted environments. Trigger with "deploy Alchemy integration", "Alchemy production deploy", or "promote an Alchemy service".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Set up E2E test harness for CLI applications with process spawning and assertions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generate BATS test structure and fixtures for shell script testing with setup/teardown, assertions, and mocking.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs. Evidence before assertions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run GDScript test suites from the command line with `godot --headless`, using a SceneTree/MainLoop runner script that exits non-zero on failure so CI can gate merges. Use when a Godot project needs unit tests without opening the editor, when wiring a CI job (GitHub Actions or similar) that must fail the build on a failing `.gd` test, or when a `godot --headless` invocation hangs, opens a window, or exits 0 despite failed assertions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Bridges Claude Code and Codex sessions when native tools can't reach the target. Use for 跨产品通信 / 脚本回帖 / 送达排查: cross-product messages, hooks or scripts posting to a session, verifying delivery (Held messages included), shared-work ownership, or an inbound peer assertion. Not for same-product or parent/subagent messaging (use native tools), spawning agents, moving full history, or cross-machine pairing (deprecated).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Gates whether a new test should exist and forces it to be efficient, protecting CI from low-value test bloat. Use before any change to what a pytest, Jest, or Playwright test asserts or sets up, down to one fixture or one assertion added to an existing block. Front-loads the value bar (every test must catch a realistic regression no existing test already catches; extend the nearest existing test before writing a new standalone one; test behavior through the public interface, not implementation details; collapse near-duplicates into parameterized cases) and the efficiency bar (deterministic, isolated, fast; pick the cheapest test level; Django TestCase over TransactionTestCase; no sleeps, no real network; no time bombs from absolute dates left to age against the real clock; no database a test never uses). Includes a "don't write it" decision tree. For fixing an existing flaky test use `/fixing-flaky-tests`; after this gate says a Playwright test is warranted, use `/playwright-test` for mechanics.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Records visual proof while testing UI behavior — the agent tests the app hands-on via computer use while a screen recording with structured test/assertion annotations captures the session — then posts the video and a results summary to the requested destination. Use when changed runtime behavior needs observable verification, including headless environments (scripted screenshots and probes) and non-UI changes (measured numbers, output pairs).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Set up an end-to-end test suite in any repo, following practices that make e2e a reliable per-PR gate: real flows over bypass, layered assertions, a reusable auth/session helper, video+trace evidence, and a compounding suite. Use when a repo has no e2e (or weak e2e) and you want system-level tests — "set up e2e", "add end-to-end tests", "scaffold a test gate".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Convert English-language properties in PROPERTIES.md (produced by the Fizz skill) into Solidity assertions inside the existing fuzz harness, then flip their checkboxes. Trigger on "fizz-convert", "convert properties", "implement properties from PROPERTIES.md", "convert PROPERTIES.md to Solidity".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Find out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Import data into the Simulation Data Inspector (SDI) from MAT, CSV, or Excel files, from workspace variables, or from a Simulink simulation. Use when the user wants to view a logged file in SDI, load a bench-test log, or verify what a just-completed `Simulink.sdi.createRun` or `sim(model)` produced. Covers the `'file'`, `'vars'`, and `'namevalue'` sources of `createRun`, the auto-populate behavior after `sim()`, and post-import verification. Not for comparing existing runs (use `Simulink.sdi.compareRuns`); not for streaming data live during a running simulation (use `Simulink.sdi.createRunOrAddToStreamedRun` — a separate API); and not for authoring Gherkin or Simulink Test test cases, assertions, or regression tests (use `testing-simulink-models`). Do not activate on test-authoring or verification prompts even when no test-authoring skill is available — say so and stop.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.