61.2K skills · sorted by relevance
Create and edit presentations in Figma Slides using the use_figma tool. Build layouts that follow brand guidelines or reference files, update existing slides, organize sections, and add speaker notes when requested.
Improve website loading and responsiveness by optimizing images, fonts, scripts, and caching. Identify priorities, reduce JavaScript download size, split code into smaller loads, and verify changes through a structured performance improvement workflow.
Design and improve welcome flows, empty screens, and guided tours that help new users complete their first useful task. Includes contextual hints, optional guidance, completion tracking, and ways to assess whether users understand what to do next.
Add AI chat, text generation, and agents to applications using AI SDK. The skill checks documentation and source code to guide streaming replies, external tool calls, structured results, React integration, and fixes for outdated API usage.
Create or review Blazor components, reusable parts of a web interface. Covers passing data and events between parent and child components, content templates, asynchronous work, display states, and resource cleanup when components are removed.
Design ClickHouse tables, write analytical queries, and plan data loading using practical SQL and code patterns. Use it to review slow queries, build recurring summaries, and analyze user activity across large datasets.
Document an incident with a sourced timeline, clear user impact, and analysis that separates symptoms, triggers, and underlying causes. Produce a blameless review with action items that specify responsible teams, deadlines, and checkable completion criteria.
Request an independent code review using Meta Muse Wonder at max reasoning through Pi and OpenRouter. Receive the reviewer's complete, unchanged report on serious issues, proposed fixes, validation gaps, and readiness to merge into production.
Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write a PR-FAQ for our launch", or "define the launch narrative and value pillars"; derives from the positioning canvas a message house — tagline, one-liner, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]) — plus a working-backwards PR-FAQ narrative spine (launch-day tense, empty-chair test, five external + five internal FAQs) and per-channel message angle packs (angles, not finished copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for finished blog posts or pages — use content-writer; not for ad or email units — use each discipline creative builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 消息屋/PR-FAQ/价值支柱/发布叙事
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks to "author our durable brand message hierarchy", "build the brand message house that seeds the canon", or "define the main narrative, three pillars, and tagline for the whole brand"; produces the DURABLE brand message system — main narrative, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]'), and the tagline/one-liner — that seeds the narrative-registry canon and from which every per-launch house derives. Not for a single launch's message house or PR-FAQ — use message-house-builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry; not for the change-narrative arc itself — use strategic-narrative-designer. 品牌消息屋/主叙事/三支柱/标语/持久叙事 canon
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create or review Blazor components (.razor files) with correct architecture. USE FOR: writing new Blazor components that do NOT involve JavaScript interop, implementing parameters and EventCallback, RenderFragment slots, component lifecycle (OnInitializedAsync, OnParametersSet), async patterns, IAsyncDisposable, CancellationToken, CSS isolation, code-behind. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new projects (use create-blazor-project), JavaScript interop or calling browser APIs from Blazor (use use-js-interop), forms and validation (use collect-user-input), prerendering issues (use support-prerendering), HTTP data fetching patterns (use fetch-and-send-data), coordinating state between unrelated components (use coordinate-components).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Allows you to view the user's screen as well as several hours of history. Use when the user makes a reference to their recent work, for which it'd be helpful to see the screen. This skill MUST be used whenever you need to resolve ambiguity in a user request, where the user hasn't specified enough context to do the task. Examples include disambiguating the specific user/app/document/error the user is referring to. You must also use this skill if the user asks about any question regarding Chronicle or asks what you can see from the screen.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Documentation reference for writing Python code using the browser-use open-source library. Use this skill whenever the user needs help with Agent, Browser, or Tools configuration, is writing code that imports from browser_use, asks about @sandbox deployment, supported LLM models, Actor API, custom tools, lifecycle hooks, MCP server setup, or monitoring/observability with Laminar or OpenLIT. Also trigger for questions about browser-use installation, prompting strategies, or sensitive data handling. Do NOT use this for Cloud API/SDK usage or pricing — use the cloud skill instead. Do NOT use this for directly automating a browser via CLI commands — use the browser-use skill instead.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Write structured use cases with main and alternate flows. Use when the user says "write a use case", "document the user flow", "use case diagram", "actor goal list", "main success scenario", "fully dressed use case", "what does the user do step by step", "system behavior for this feature", "interaction flow" - even if they don't explicitly say "use case".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when configuring delegated administration to allow non-system-admin users to manage specific user groups, reset passwords, assign permission sets, or administer custom objects. Covers the DelegateGroup metadata type (delegateGroups/*.delegateGroup-meta.xml), its roles / profiles / permissionSets / permissionSetGroups / groups / customObjects / loginAccess fields, delegate-group log-in-as, and the deploy and review path for them. NOT for creating, deactivating or licensing users yourself — use admin/user-management. NOT for auto-assigning permission sets from user attributes — use admin/user-access-policies.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill when writing test-first, behavior-driven acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then format for a Salesforce user story. Covers happy path, edge cases, negative paths, permission boundaries, and data-state preconditions so the AC block can drive UAT scripts and Apex test design downstream. Trigger keywords: given when then, gherkin, behavior driven AC, test first acceptance criteria, scenario outline, BDD acceptance criteria. NOT for the user-story format itself (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for UAT script writing (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for high-level UAT planning (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). More triggers: acceptance criteria record, ac_id, req_id on a criterion, artefact under test, negative case for a rule-type requirement, no-match fall-through criterion, oracle for a Then clause, test type apex flow manual, criteria linter, check_ac_format.py, --manifest-dir.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
システムログを分析してエラーの根本原因を特定し、段階的に深堀りしていくデバッグ専門家スキル。 アプリケーションログ、システムログ、クラウドサービスログなど様々な形式に対応。 5 Whys、タイムライン分析、Fishbone分析などのRCA（根本原因分析）手法を用いて 問題の本質を突き止め、再発防止策まで提案する。 Use when analyzing system logs to find error root causes, debugging application issues, or performing technical post-mortem analysis with log data. For organizational incident management processes (post-incident review, corrective action plans, incident reports without log data), use incident-rca-specialist instead. Triggers: "analyze this log", "find the root cause", "debug this error", "why is this failing", "log analysis", "what caused this crash", "troubleshoot this issue"
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Triages an incoming non-disclosure agreement against the organisation's written standard NDA positions and returns a DRAFT triage pack: a clause-by-clause deviations table with a severity band, a suggested response per clause quoted from the positions document, open questions and a governing-law flag, all for counsel to decide. Never gives legal advice or an acceptability call. Use when the user asks to "triage this NDA against our standard positions", "screen this confidentiality agreement before it goes to legal", "red-flag this mutual NDA", "first-pass the counterparty's NDA" or "is this NDA standard or does it need counsel". Do not use for a full review of an MSA, SOW, licence or any whole contract, use contract-review-pack instead; for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write a PR-FAQ for our launch", or "define the launch narrative and value pillars"; derives from the positioning canvas a message house — tagline, one-liner, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]) — plus a working-backwards PR-FAQ narrative spine (launch-day tense, empty-chair test, five external + five internal FAQs) and per-channel message angle packs (angles, not finished copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for finished blog posts or pages — use content-writer; not for ad or email units — use each discipline creative builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 消息屋/PR-FAQ/价值支柱/发布叙事
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the user asks to "author our durable brand message hierarchy", "build the brand message house that seeds the canon", or "define the main narrative, three pillars, and tagline for the whole brand"; produces the DURABLE brand message system — main narrative, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]'), and the tagline/one-liner — that seeds the narrative-registry canon and from which every per-launch house derives. Not for a single launch's message house or PR-FAQ — use message-house-builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry; not for the change-narrative arc itself — use strategic-narrative-designer. 品牌消息屋/主叙事/三支柱/标语/持久叙事 canon
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.