Results for “conform”

Load this skill when writing, reviewing, or interpreting behavioral accessibility automation — tests that manipulate a rendered page (resizing the viewport, pressing real keys, capturing and comparing screenshots) rather than only inspecting static markup or a single computed accessibility tree. Covers Reflow risk (SC 1.4.10) and Focus Visible risk (SC 2.4.7) checks. Absolutely always report indicator results separately from confirmed failures. Under no circumstances treat a clean behavioral scan as WCAG conformance, or collapse `cantTell`/test-error/indicator outcomes into a single pass/fail signal.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Act as a Senior Accessibility Engineer to audit a page, component, or design against WCAG 2.2 AA. Produces a triaged finding list (critical/serious/moderate), focus-order map, contrast report, ARIA decision tree, and a screen-reader test plan. Use when shipping new UI, hardening an existing flow, or preparing for VPAT/accessibility conformance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reviews and fixes Swift concurrency: Swift 6 strict-concurrency compiler errors, Sendable conformance, actor isolation, @MainActor, and data-race safety. Use when migrating async code to Swift 6 or resolving concurrency diagnostics.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turn a proven POC into a real, crouton-native, documented package(s) + a consuming app — the deliberate "step back and rebuild" checkpoint. SPEC-DRIVEN — the POC discovers a behaviour spec (captured at each sign-off), graduation freezes it as authoritative, the app is rebuilt the crouton way to satisfy it, and nothing is done until it's checked + signed off against two gates (experience + crouton-conformance). Use when a `pocs/*` app is proven and "done", or asked to "graduate this poc", "make it a real app", "extract the package".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when designing, reviewing, modifying, migrating, optimizing, securing, operating, troubleshooting, or decommissioning data architectures across data model exploration, SQL, ISO SQL conformance, NoSQL, vector, graph, document, time-series, NewSQL, search, in-memory, SQLite, CDC/Debezium, DBMS storage/query/recovery internals, database incident prevention, hardware acceleration, cache, big-data, lakehouse, and warehouse systems.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run ADR conformance checks, explain failures, and identify required ADR/doc updates for the current change.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when working with Aws Config — aWS Config compliance dashboard, rule evaluation status, conformance pack management, and resource timeline analysis. Covers configuration recorder status, compliance summary, non-compliant resource investigation, remediation tracking, and aggregator management.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert en gouvernance des données (catalogage, lineage, règles qualité, conformité, stewardship)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compliance Automation Specialist IA — Expert en automatisation de la conformité (regulatory monitoring, policy management, audit trails)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert en conformité automatisée avancée (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, RGPD DZ, audit trails, policy management, Drata, Vanta)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert en conformité (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, audits)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Accessibility Compliance Specialist IA — Expert en conformité accessibilité (ADA, Section 508, RGAA, EN 301 549, WCAG legal)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert en conformité des agents IA (RGPD, AI Act, gestion données, consentement, audit trails, réglementations DZ)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Implement, review, or improve SwiftUI gesture handling. Use when adding tap, long press, drag, magnify, or rotate gestures, composing gestures with simultaneously/sequenced/exclusively, managing transient state with @GestureState, resolving parent/child gesture conflicts with highPriorityGesture or simultaneousGesture, building custom Gesture protocol conformances, or migrating from deprecated MagnificationGesture to MagnifyGesture or using the newer RotateGesture.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Resolve Swift concurrency compiler errors, adopt approachable concurrency (SE-0466), and write data-race-safe async code. Use when fixing Sendable conformance errors, actor isolation warnings, or strict concurrency diagnostics; when adopting default MainActor isolation, @concurrent, nonisolated(nonsending), or Task.immediate; when designing actor-based architectures, structured concurrency with TaskGroup, or background work offloading; or when migrating from @preconcurrency to full Swift 6 strict concurrency.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Diagnose data races, convert callback-based code to async/await, implement actor isolation patterns, resolve Sendable conformance issues, and guide Swift 6 migration. Use when developers mention: (1) Swift Concurrency, async/await, actors, or tasks, (2) "use Swift Concurrency" or "modern concurrency patterns", (3) migrating to Swift 6, (4) data races or thread safety issues, (5) refactoring closures to async/await, (6) @MainActor, Sendable, or actor isolation, (7) concurrent code architecture or performance optimization, (8) concurrency-related linter warnings (SwiftLint or similar; e.g. async_without_await, Sendable/actor isolation/MainActor lint).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Swift Concurrency review and remediation for Swift 6.2+. Use when asked to review Swift Concurrency usage, improve concurrency compliance, or fix Swift concurrency compiler errors in a feature or file. Concrete actions include adding Sendable conformance, applying @MainActor annotations, resolving actor isolation warnings, fixing data race diagnostics, and migrating completion handlers to async/await.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Auditoria de seguranca, qualidade e conformidade. OWASP Top 10, secrets scan, dependency audit. Use antes de deploy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design and create Busabase-backed App-in-Skill packages with a canonical app project, Busabase-native setup and product onboarding, review/execution workflows, a standardized responsive UI, and AirApp-first delivery. Use when a user wants a Busabase research desk, review queue, planner, action console, operating dashboard, control panel, collaboration workspace, onboarding/readiness flow, or an existing Kelly App-based skill updated. Every generated skill contains a complete app/ project, deploys that source to Busabase AirApp by default, runs pnpm dev only when local preview is explicitly requested, follows the Kelly desktop and phone UI contract, delegates AirApp runtime, SDK, security, scaffolding, and deployment constraints to busabase-app-creator, and delegates repository-level conformance testing to kelly-app-skill-creator-tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.