Results for “security”

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Pre-production security checklist for Agentforce deployments: agent run-as permission scope, grounding-source data classification, action write-scope, audit trail. NOT for the full go-live readiness gate covering cost telemetry, rate limits, rollout and rollback — use agentforce/agentforce-production-readiness-checklist. NOT for a general org security review — use security/security-health-check.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when configuring org-wide platform settings: MFA enforcement, My Domain setup and deployment, session timeout and security settings, password policies, trusted IP ranges (Network Access), and CSP Trusted Sites. Owns these settings as deployable Settings metadata (Security.settings, MyDomain.settings, Company.settings, Language.settings) and the order in which a new org is stood up. Trigger keywords: 'MFA setup', 'My Domain', 'session settings', 'password policy', 'trusted IP ranges', 'CSP trusted sites', 'Security.settings', 'SecuritySettings metadata', 'MyDomainSettings', 'settings-meta.xml', 'enhanced domains', 'deploy org settings', 'new org setup order', 'sessionTimeout enum', 'lockSessionsToIp', 'enableAdminLoginAsAnyUser'. NOT for user-level login restrictions (use user-management), NOT for permission model design (use permission-sets-vs-profiles), NOT for security audit and hardening review (use security/org-hardening-and-baseline-config).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Drafts a U.S. C-TPAT Security Profile for CBP submission covering physical, personnel, procedural, conveyance, and IT security domains. Use when preparing C-TPAT enrollment, certification, validation, or recertification profiles, or assembling a CBP-ready security narrative. Trigger: C-TPAT, CBP security profile, supply chain security, trusted trader, customs validation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Repository または subsystem を対象に、source-only で明示的なセキュリティ監査を行う entry skill。 通常の PR セキュリティレビューとは分離し、reconnaissance、scope 固定、既存 security skill への委譲、 evidence と unresolved hypothesis、observe-only SecurityAuditCoverage、coverage critic、 structured audit artifact と repeat-run coverage を扱う。target-controlled code は実行しない。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

セキュリティ観点の通常レビューエージェント。 基本的なセキュリティチェック、認証・認可設計、プライバシー設計の個別スキルへルーティングする。 repository / subsystem の明示的な security audit は river-review-security-audit へ委譲する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for SQL injection, XSS, command injection, exposed API keys, hardcoded secrets, insecure dependencies, access control issues, or any request like "is my code secure?", "review for security issues", "audit this codebase", or "check for vulnerabilities". Covers injection flaws, authentication and access control bugs, secrets exposure, weak cryptography, insecure dependencies, and business logic issues across JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, PHP, Go, Ruby, and Rust.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Configure GitHub Advanced Security with CodeQL to perform automated static analysis and vulnerability Tespit across repositories at enterprise scale.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Implement eBPF-based runtime security observability and enforcement in Kubernetes clusters using Cilium Tetragon for kernel-level threat Tespit and policy enforcement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Perform security testing of SOAP web services by analyzing WSDL definitions and testing for XML injection, XXE, WS-Security bypass, and SOAPAction spoofing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem storage, and evaluating runtime behavior. Activates for requests involving iOS security testing, Objection runtime analysis, Frida-based iOS assessment, or mobile runtime exploration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and incident response. Use PROACTIVELY for security audits, DevSecOps, or compliance implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem storage, and evaluating runtime behavior. Activates for requests involving iOS security testing, Objection runtime analysis, Frida-based iOS assessment, or mobile runtime exploration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Assess OpenClaw security reports against released versions and documented trust boundaries, which define trusted users and components. Gather evidence to recommend closing, keeping open, or narrowing a report, and draft a maintainer response.

• Assessing an OpenClaw security report
• Checking whether released versions contain a reported bug
• Comparing a report with existing advisories

Implement and review security measures in Quarkus applications. Covers sign-in, access permissions, input validation, password hashing, secret storage, request limits, audit logs, and checks for known vulnerabilities in dependencies, with implementation and configuration examples.

• Adding JWT or OIDC authentication to a Quarkus API
• Checking role permissions and resource ownership
• Reviewing input validation and database queries