Results for “compare”

Generate a conversion-focused landing page that compares offers, pricing cues, and trust signals for a family law practice. Use when handling offer...

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Query .NET APIs across NuGet packages, platform libraries, and local files. Search for types, list API surfaces, compare and diff versions, find extension methods and implementors. Use whenever you need to answer questions about .NET library contents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Search, score, and compare flights with jetlag impact analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compare models with A/B testing for selection

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

AI tool marketplace via AgentForge — discover, compare, and execute tools with automatic billing and trust scoring.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use cheap, TEE-verified AI models from the 0G Compute Network as OpenClaw providers. Discover available models and compare pricing vs OpenRouter, verify provider integrity via hardware attestation (Intel TDX), manage your 0G wallet and sub-accounts, and configure models in OpenClaw with one workflow. Supports DeepSeek, GLM-5, Qwen, and other models available on the 0G marketplace.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use for tradeoff analysis, or when the user must pick between concrete options: "A or B?", "which library should we use?", "build vs buy", "compare these approaches". Scores options on weighted criteria, tests sensitivity and reversibility. Skip for open ideation or single-option reviews.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Research current job markets and hiring requirements, analyze recent job descriptions (JDs), compare them with a user's resume, projects, skills, and constraints, and turn evidence gaps into prioritized career actions. Use when students, job seekers, or career changers ask about current role or industry outlook (including “现在行情怎么样”), whether a role or JD fits them (including “这个JD适合我吗”), cross-platform JD sampling, resume evidence gaps or truthful tailoring, what career skill to learn next, target-role course or certificate decisions, application readiness, or a capacity-bounded 30/60/90-day job-search plan. Do not use for unrelated personal or education advice, simple factual lookups, automatic job applications, or unsupported resume rewriting.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Trigger when: (1) the user mentions "manim", "scene", "video", "EN/KO render", "GEODE_HERO_LANG", "1080p60", or (2) editing files under `scripts/visualizations/` ending in `.py`, or (3) the user asks to render, re-render, or extend any of the four validated scenes (`geode_hero.py`, `autoresearch_filewalk.py`, `autoresearch_compare.py`, `critical_floor.py`). GEODE Manim Scene authoring standard. Locks the patterns the four validated scenes already share — Anthropic-style palette, Helvetica Neue + Pretendard font pairing with weight=NORMAL, EN/KO multilingual lang via `GEODE_HERO_LANG` env, `_dashed_arrow_with_head` stage-coupled tinting, `verify_hero_layout.py` ratchet — so the next scene does not re-discover the kerning / padding / transition regressions catalogued in [[viz-frame-audit]].

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

对 profiling 数据（kernel_details.csv / trace_view.json / step_trace_time.csv）做统一分析： 5 层递进管道（analyze_trace.py）+ baseline/优化后 kernel diff（compare_traces.py），输出 瓶颈诊断、算子执行序、可融合候选与 P0-P2 方向建议。输入统一来自 profiling-collect。 只要用户有 profiling 产出并问"为什么慢/瓶颈在哪/优化前后差多少/往哪个方向"，都用本技能；采集走 profiling-collect，方案选档走 dit-perf-opt，实现/并行/基准走 pattern-dev/dit-parallel-opt/benchmark-dev——本技能只做诊断与方向。 由 model-auto-optimization 的 S1（融合分析）/S3（并行）阶段调用，亦由 dev-workflow 的分析阶段指引加载。 融合机会候选只做**识别**；候选的**边界与收益判定**（能不能融成一个单元、融多大、值不值）交 `fusion-scope-analyze`（本技能的辅助技能）——本技能不判融合边界。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot; MetaPlotR; deepTools computeMatrix scale-regions), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (log2 IP/input bigWig via deepTools bamCompare; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV/UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), feature-distribution stacked bars, and volcano/MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012; Meyer 2012). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the stop-codon enrichment plot.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compare gene co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to find rewired relationships using DiffCorr, DiffCoEx, DINGO/iDINGO, and CoDiNA. Covers the differential-connectivity-is-not-differential-expression distinction, the pairwise multiple-testing explosion, marginal vs partial (direct) rewiring, and the underpowered-rewiring failure mode. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment, or developmental stages, or finding hub genes that rewire without changing mean expression. For single-condition modules see coexpression-networks; for differential expression of means see differential-expression/de-results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. NOT for product discovery or refining an existing plan.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Inspect scoped Autodesk data, compare versioned BOMs, and prepare ownership-aware drafts or approved custom-property changes. Not for implicit PLM release, membership changes or CAD geometry editing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.