Results for “compare”

Use this skill when the company acts as a processor for its customers and someone asks "update our subprocessor list", "are we missing subprocessors", "we added a new tool, do we need to tell customers", "check the public subprocessor page", "where is customer data processed" or "draft the subprocessor change notice". Finds which suppliers actually receive customer personal data, compares them with the published list, records purpose, data, locations and transfer basis for each, works out the customer notice duties from the signed agreements, and writes an updated register, a change list and a draft notice for review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill when a published privacy notice may no longer match what the company does, or someone asks "is our privacy policy accurate", "check our privacy notice against the RoPA", "privacy notice review", "Article 13 and 14 check", "does our website privacy policy cover our vendors and cookies" or "update the privacy notice for the new product". Maps every collection point, compares each notice with the processing record, the vendor list and what the site and product actually collect, classifies what is missing, wrong, vague or stale, and drafts a redline plus the practice fixes that a notice edit cannot solve.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill when a company needs recovery objectives it can defend, before a continuity plan, a disaster recovery design, an audit or a resilience review, and asks "do a BIA", "business impact analysis", "set our RTO and RPO", "what is our maximum tolerable downtime", "which services are critical", "impact tolerance" or "can our backups meet our recovery targets". Lists services from the customer's view, prices an outage over time in the company's own money and obligations, sets recovery time and data loss objectives, maps dependencies, and compares each objective with what backups, restore tests, suppliers and people actually allow, listing the gaps for a decision.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill when a data processing agreement is being negotiated or renewed and someone asks "review the TOMs annex", "check the security measures in this DPA", "can we sign this annex", "the customer sent their DPA with a security schedule", "is our standard annex still true" or "does this vendor's annex promise enough". Breaks the technical and organisational measures annex into single commitments, compares each one with what the company actually runs or with what the use case needs, and writes a line-by-line review, proposed redlines and a list of practice gaps for owners.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Guides implementation of agent memory systems, compares production frameworks (Mem0, Zep/Graphiti, Letta, LangMem, Cognee), and designs persistence architectures for cross-session knowledge retention. Use when the user asks to "implement agent memory", "persist state across sessions", "build knowledge graph for agents", "track entities over time", "add long-term memory", "choose a memory framework", or mentions temporal knowledge graphs, vector stores, entity memory, adaptive memory, dynamic memory or memory benchmarks (LoCoMo, LongMemEval).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Fetches real-time Azure retail pricing using the Azure Retail Prices API (prices.azure.com) and estimates Copilot Studio agent credit consumption. Use when asked what an Azure service costs, to compare regions or SKUs, to estimate a workload, or about reserved, savings plan, or spot pricing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Validate Commodore MPS-801 serial dot matrix printer behavior in EMULATORS, including SerialPrinterMPS801 classes and their MatrixPrinterEmulation and SerialPrinterPeripheralSimulation hierarchy, IEC/KERNAL-trap printer routing, device numbers, secondary addresses, PETSCII/character sets, 6x7 glyphs, double width, graphics mode, reverse field, tab and dot positioning, line/page geometry, PostScript output, and fidelity boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits COMMODORE MPS801 printer code, generated printer output, PostScript printer templates, C64/VIC-20/C264 serial-printer behavior, or compares implementation against .codex/docs/MPS801.pdf and historical MPS-801 sources.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Validate Commodore MPS-802 and 1526 serial dot matrix printer behavior in EMULATORS, including SerialPrinterMPS802 classes and their MatrixPrinterEmulation and SerialPrinterPeripheralSimulation hierarchy, IEC/KERNAL-trap printer routing, device numbers, secondary-address functions, PETSCII/character sets, 8x8 glyphs, enhanced width, reverse and paging modes, formatter strings, programmable characters, line/page geometry, PostScript output, and fidelity boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits COMMODORE MPS802 printer code, generated printer output, PostScript printer templates, C64/VIC-20/C264 serial-printer behavior, or compares implementation against .codex/docs/MPS802.pdf, the MPS-802 user guide, and 1526/MPS-802/4023 service information.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Research and stress-test open-source project names, from collision checks to launch-ready decisions. Use when the user asks to name or rename a project, compare candidate names, screen GitHub or package namespace risk, verify language or mythology claims, or improve SEO/GEO clarity. Perform live web and registry research, separate brand from category descriptor, classify collisions, and return one evidence-backed recommendation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when work is ambiguous or has multiple viable paths; compares options, assumptions, evidence, tradeoffs, and the best next action.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Discover, compare, and compose existing open-source GitHub repositories for a user's goal, using GitHub MCP for live discovery and verification plus Context7 semantic retrieval over repository code and official documentation. Use when a user asks for GitHub repo recommendations, open-source alternatives, a multi-repository solution stack, project comparison, or help choosing an implementation to adopt.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Conduct reproducible web searches and decision-oriented research across official sites, search engines, news, papers, forums, social platforms, and public datasets. Use when Codex must investigate a person, organization, product, market, technical resource, reputation, career choice, or other current topic; compare candidates; verify claims; collect dated citations; distinguish facts from inference and anecdote; or write an evidence-backed research report.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Multi-angle deep-research workflow over Ahmad's OpenMark knowledge graph (13k+ bookmarks). Use whenever Ahmad asks anything that requires more than one search to answer well — "what's the landscape of X in my saves", "do a deep dive on Y", "research X across my bookmarks", "compare what I saved about X vs Y", "give me everything on X". Also use when fast-search returned thin results and Ahmad pushed back ("dig deeper", "more results", "actually research it"). Pairs Neo4j graph search with WebFetch on top picks to bring back fresh page content. Triggers on "deep research", "dig deeper", "research", "landscape", "everything on", "thorough", "comprehensive".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violations introduced, violations fixed, and pre-existing count. Use `scan` for a full audit with no diffing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the ATT&CK Navigator and attackcti Python library. The analyst queries STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, generates Navigator layer files for visualization, and compares defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Activates for requests involving APT TTP mapping, ATT&CK Navigator layers, threat actor profiling, or MITRE technique coverage analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Pre-checks one expense claim or travel plan, line by line, against the expense or travel policy the user supplies, and returns a DRAFT precheck sheet: the policy clause matched to each line, the limit quoted as the policy states it, whether the amount sits within, at or outside that limit, missing receipts, pre-approvals or justifications, and neutral questions for the approver and the claimant, with UNKNOWN wherever the policy or the claim is silent. Use when the user asks to "check this expense claim against policy", "pre-check my travel request", "is this claim within policy", "review these expenses before I submit them", "what receipts or approvals are missing" or "prepare the approver's questions for this claim". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; do not use to compare a policy against a standard or regulation, use policy-gap-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

価値概念とIT要求・活動のスコア乖離検証結果の良い点・悪い点を分析し、改善のための問いを生成

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

価値概念との乖離を検証

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

検証結果に基づいてスコア乖離検証結果を洗練・修正する

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.