Results for “engineer”

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

UBNT/UniFi 企业 Wi-Fi 工程 (UniFi/UBNT Enterprise Wi-Fi Engineering) Master OS — automated mastery of UniFi/UBNT Enterprise Wi-Fi Engineering: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on UniFi/UBNT Enterprise Wi-Fi Engineering problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「造大师 UBNT Wi-Fi」「UBNT WiFi 工程」「UniFi 高密度部署」「我做企业 Wi-Fi」「80 人办公网慢」

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ai-engineer workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Orchestrate evidence-first engineering for WeChat and other mini programs from a vague idea or existing repository through project discovery, product specification, architecture, implementation, debugging, device adaptation, verification, and release readiness. Use when users ask to build a mini program from zero to one, take over an existing mini-program project, deliver a cross-stage feature, diagnose project status, coordinate development and testing, or judge whether a mini program is ready to upload or release. Enforces fact discovery, change boundaries, stage gates, evidence-calibrated status, sensitive-information redaction, and continuity after side questions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when a product brief is finalized and ready to hand off to the engineering team, or when asked to send a brief to Apex, kick off engineering work, or start development on a product spec. Examples: "hand this off to engineering", "send brief to Apex", "start building this", "kick off dev on this spec".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ML/AI engineer — LLM integrations, prompt engineering, model pipelines, evals, RAG. Use when asked to "add AI to this", "integrate an LLM", "build a RAG pipeline", "evaluate model accuracy", or "improve this prompt".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Audit existing resilience — identify untested failure modes and chaos engineering gaps. Use when asked "how resilient are we", "what failure modes are untested", or "find our chaos engineering gaps".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate onboarding documentation — what this project does, how to set up locally, where things live, key decisions, how to deploy. Written for day-one engineers who know nothing. Use when asked for "onboarding docs", "new engineer guide", "how to get started", or "developer setup".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Provides chaos engineering best practices for resilience testing, fault injection, and game day planning. Use when designing resilience experiments, configuring chaos tools, planning game days, or when user mentions 'chaos engineering', 'resilience', 'litmus', 'game day', 'fault injection', 'chaos monkey', 'blast radius', 'steady state', 'failure mode'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Systems engineering covering requirements management, the V-model lifecycle, integration planning, verification and validation (V&V), interface control, trade studies, and the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. Spans the full lifecycle from concept through operations and disposal. Includes requirements decomposition, traceability matrices, configuration management, and technical performance measures. Use when managing complex system development, writing requirements, planning integration, or conducting V&V activities.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Transition from a hands-on "bricklayer" to a high-level "architect" by managing a fleet of autonomous AI agents. Use this when you need to scale engineering output with a small team, handle repetitive migrations/bug fixes, or onboard engineers to complex legacy codebases.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US software development firms — custom software, web development, mobile app development, backend/API development, DevOps/cloud, system integration, and hosting. Triggers on "find a software dev shop in Austin", "shortlist three custom-software firms with healthcare experience", "we need a mobile app developer for our iOS launch", or "pull contact info for these 10 dev shop domains", even when described indirectly (build a tool, ship a feature, technical partner). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-web-developer for strictly website/landing-page projects. Defer AI/ML, ML pipelines, model building, and data-engineering asks — those are a sibling industry, not software development. Skip in-house engineer hires, code-writing/debugging tasks, cloud-product comparisons, hardware/civil engineering, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

[Deprecated] engineering bridge merged. Use `cm-mcp-engineering` instead.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Nature-style engineering manuscript reviewer skill for testing devices, robots, platforms, systems, algorithms embodied in physical systems and engineering methods against requirements, validation, benchmarking, uncertainty, robustness and failure modes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Decompile, analyze, and reverse engineer Android applications (APKs). Utilize tools like JADX, Apktool, and dex2jar to extract source code (Java/Kotlin), analyze manifest configurations (Intents, Activities), and identify hardcoded secrets or insecure API endpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reverse engineers malware written in less-common compiled languages (Nim, Crystal, V, Zig, D) by detecting language-specific runtime signatures, name-mangling, and runtime strings to orient analysis. Activates for requests to reverse Nim malware, identify the source language of an exotic binary, or analyze Crystal/V/Zig/D compiled samples.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Uses Ghidra to disassemble and decompile a binary, navigate to key routines via imports and strings, annotate decompiled code, and run headless scripts to automate extraction of C2, crypto, and config. Activates for requests to reverse engineer with Ghidra, decompile a binary, or script Ghidra headless analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reverse engineers binaries using radare2/rizin interactively, covering analysis initialization, navigation, disassembly and graph views, patching, and the visual mode workflow. Activates for requests to reverse a binary with radare2 or rizin, learn r2 commands, or navigate and disassemble a sample in r2.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reverse engineers binaries with Binary Ninja using its analysis stack and Python API to enumerate functions, navigate IL levels (LLIL/MLIL/HLIL), and automate annotation and extraction. Activates for requests to reverse a binary with Binary Ninja, script the Binary Ninja API, or work with its intermediate languages.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reverse engineers ARM/AArch64 malware by identifying the architecture and instruction set state (ARM/Thumb), parsing ELF/Mach-O ARM headers, and orienting analysis around the ARM calling convention. Activates for requests to reverse ARM binaries, analyze AArch64 malware, or handle ARM/Thumb instruction-set decoding.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Prevents overengineering when designing, implementing, refactoring, or reviewing software. Use when the user asks to implement a feature, add an abstraction, refactor code, review a design, simplify existing code, or make an architectural decision. Also triggers when the user asks if code is too complex, whether to abstract something, or how to structure something. Do not use for deployment, infrastructure configuration, or debugging runtime errors unrelated to code structure.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.