Results for “commit”

Use when: analysing a project's delivery health — CI/CD, commit patterns, and working tree state.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

GitHub PR lifecycle: branch, commit, open, CI, merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MCP Agent Mail - Mail-like coordination layer for multi-agent workflows. Identities, inbox/outbox, file reservations, contact policies, threaded messaging, pre-commit guard, Human Overseer, static exports, disaster recovery. Git+SQLite backed. Python/FastMCP.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Handle pull requests and review comments using GitHub CLI (gh). Use when the user wants to check PR comments, address review feedback, reply with commit hashes, or work with pull requests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Vendor (copy-import) a single external Claude Code skill into your own skills repo correctly — with license compliance and full provenance/attribution. Deterministic, idempotent primitive: given an upstream ref (owner/repo/path@sha or a GitHub URL) it fetches the skill, detects and gates on the license, copies the folder, injects a provenance frontmatter block (license + metadata: author/source/upstream_commit/vendored_at/provenance), ships the upstream LICENSE, adds a ## Credits section, and records a CREDITS.md ledger entry. Use when the user asks to "vendor a skill", "import a skill", "clone a skill", "borrow someone's skill", "add an external skill with attribution/credit", or スキルを取り込む / vendoring / 他人のスキルを自分のリポに取り込む. This is the import primitive that a skill-scout/curator orchestrator calls; it does NOT discover or evaluate — it correctly imports ONE skill you already chose.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Add GitHub permalinks with fixed SHA/commit references to research documentation containing code snippets. Use when writing technical docs with code examples, creating investigation/research docs that reference source files, user asks to "add permalinks" or "add GitHub links", documenting code research findings with file:line references, or creating audit trails needing permanent code references. Triggers on "add github links", "add permalinks", "link to source", "make code references permanent".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

「学内委員会・教授会の議事録作成を AI で効率化したい」「録音から要点抽出のプロセスを標準化したい」 「機密性の高い会議で AI を使っていいか判断したい」「人事案件を含む教授会で AI 議事録ツールを 使って大丈夫か確認したい」「Enterprise 版がない自学で使える経路を知りたい」場面で使う、 議事録 AI 化の判断と運用のスキル。 `skills/confidential-info-guidelines/` の 3 段分類と連携し、会議機密性 × 出席者同意 × 匿名化の 3 軸判断でツール選定と運用手順を示す。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

変更内容を確認し、論理的な単位で複数のコミットに分けて実行します

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Improve, rewrite, and explain workplace English for an English-as-a-second-language professional in Australia. Use when the user asks to polish, fix, rewrite, improve, or check work emails, Slack or Teams messages, follow-ups, replies to managers or stakeholders, technical explanations, status updates, polite chasing messages, questions, pushback, issue explanations, or similar workplace communication for Australian companies. Ask targeted clarifying questions before rewriting when the intended meaning, recipient, action, deadline, blame, commitment, or technical conclusion is unclear.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Review the current changes for the CWE classes Peephole enforces, as a checklist including the absence-of-guard classes regexes cannot catch. Use when the user says /sec-review or asks for a security review of recent code before committing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Personal App-in-Skill customer-support desk (help desk) that triages incoming support tickets from email, WhatsApp, web chat, contact forms, and WeChat, drafts KB-grounded replies, and proposes actions, then holds every send behind a human approval queue with a pre-send quality gate (support-qa) that outputs SHIP/FIX/BLOCK, plus SLA and CSAT tracking. Use when the user invokes $kelly-support or /kelly-support, mentions 客服 / 工单 / 支持台, a support desk, help desk, customer service, support tickets, ticket triage, a knowledge base or canned macros, SLA / first-response time, CSAT, escalations, or refund requests, wants incoming tickets triaged into a needs_review → approved → done pipeline, agent-drafted replies grounded in a knowledge base and reviewed before sending, refunds and commitments gated behind human approval, or breaching-SLA tickets surfaced. This is the OPERATOR desk (agent + human), distinct from a visitor-facing chat bubble.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

End-to-end ABM program design and orchestration for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise motions. Use when building a target account list, designing account tiering criteria, planning ABM channel orchestration, coordinating BDR outreach with marketing campaigns, defining ABM measurement frameworks, or running an ABM program review. Also use when asked to "build an ABM program," "set up account-based marketing," "design a target account strategy," "plan ABM campaigns," or "measure ABM results." Designed for demand gen teams selling to Mid-Market companies with $10K-$50K+ ACV, multi-persona buying committees, and 3-6 month sales cycles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generates and maintains competitive battlecards from win/loss data, competitor intel, G2 reviews, and sales feedback. Use when building battlecards for a specific competitor, updating existing battlecards with new intel, preparing BDRs or AEs for competitive deals, analyzing win/loss patterns against a competitor, or responding to a competitor's product launch or pricing change. Also use when asked to "build a battlecard," "update competitive intel," "how do we beat [competitor]," "what do we say when a prospect mentions [competitor]," or "analyze our win/loss against [competitor]." Designed for B2B SaaS teams selling against known competitors in deals with multi-persona buying committees.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generates account research briefs, personalized outreach sequences, persona-specific talk tracks, and objection handling frameworks for B2B SaaS BDR teams. Use when preparing BDR outreach for target accounts, building prospecting sequences, creating call scripts, developing objection responses, onboarding new BDRs, or reviewing outreach performance. Also use when asked to "write outreach emails," "build a prospecting sequence," "create a call script," "handle objections," or "research an account for outreach." Designed for BDR teams selling compliance, security, and GRC platforms to mid-market and enterprise buyers with multi-persona buying committees.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Unified pull request workflow: prepare a safe branch, run read-only review, fix Required findings, create/update a GitHub draft PR, and verify CI plus automated review comments. Subcommands: `create` (simplify + PR, skip code review), `review` (read-only findings only), `fix` (Required fixes + commit, no push), `simplify` (simplification only), `verify` (existing PR checks/reviews only). Use when creating or reviewing PRs, self-reviewing changes, simplifying PR changes, or requesting "PR作成", "レビュー", "簡素化". Do NOT use for responding to review comments or a lightweight review of the current working diff without the PR workflow (use the built-in /code-review instead).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run a reviewer subagent against uncommitted local changes, a named branch, or a GitHub PR. Local and branch modes write a review file plus a summary to disk. PR mode posts the findings as a PENDING GitHub review for the user to inspect and submit through the UI.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Orchestrates the end-to-end germline short-variant pipeline from FASTQ to a filtered, normalized, benchmarked VCF, chaining QC/trim, BWA-MEM2 alignment, duplicate marking, optional BQSR, calling (bcftools/GATK HaplotypeCaller/DeepVariant/DRAGEN), normalization, site+genotype filtering, annotation, and hap.py/vcfeval benchmarking. Use when deciding the pipeline-wide reference-genome commitment (GRCh38 analysis set vs T2T, ALT/decoy handling), sequencing the steps in the defensible order (normalize BEFORE annotate, filter site- then genotype-level), choosing the calling engine and single-sample vs cohort joint-calling, picking a filtering strategy by cohort size, or benchmarking stratified within GIAB confident regions. Hands off mechanism to the variant-calling and read-alignment component skills; not a re-teach of any single step.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Quantitative drug-target validation pipeline. Scores druggability, selectivity, safety profile, ADMET feasibility, and structural tractability with a composite Target Validation Score (0-100) and GO/NO-GO recommendation. Use for go/no-go decisions on a target before commit-to-medchem, target prioritization across a list, and target-deselection rationale.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use every time you push a commit to an active pull request, to verify the PR is truly stable before reporting merge readiness. Covers the post-push wait window, AI review audit (Copilot/Greptile/Codex), and the gh commands to snapshot PR state. Trigger on "I pushed" or "is the PR ready to merge".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.