Results for “compare”

Standardizes molecular structures using ChEMBL chembl_structure_pipeline and RDKit rdMolStandardize covering sanitization, salt/solvent stripping, neutralization, tautomer canonicalization, stereochemistry standardization, mixture handling, and isotope normalization. Explicitly compares ChEMBL pipeline, canSARchem, and PubChem standardization choices. Use when preparing libraries for QSAR training, joining datasets across sources, deduplicating compound collections, or building canonical compound registries.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design charts, metrics, and data tables that help users interpret and compare data. Use when the user asks to visualize data, choose chart types, improve dashboard analytics, or make data presentation accessible. Dashboard navigation and shell layout alone belong to add-ui or arrange.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Create or redesign React and Tailwind sections, pages, flows, shells, and components. Use when the user wants new UI or a redesign. Implement one requested or selected direction directly, or generate distinct alternatives when the user asks to compare options.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Search academic literature and generate, validate, or compare Knows paper sidecars. Use for claim/evidence analysis and literature synthesis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reads and summarises ScenarioRunner output — the criteria pass/fail tables from --output/--file, the machine-readable --json and --junit result files, and the criteria JSON written alongside a --record recording — and runs the metrics module (metrics_manager.py) to compute custom measurements over a recorded run offline, without the simulator. Use when the user asks "did the scenario pass", "why did it fail", "summarise these results", "compare these runs", or wants distance/speed/lane metrics from a recording.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Check the working conditions of a Japanese job offer item by item against the conditions an employer states in writing, compare the offer letter or 労働条件通知書 with the job posting and what was said in interviews, and separate what is confirmed in writing from what is still only verbal. Use when a user has received an offer, a working-conditions notice, or an employment contract and wants to know what is missing, what conflicts with earlier statements, and what to confirm before the acceptance deadline; do not use to rule on whether the terms are lawful, to decide whether to accept or decline, or to contact the employer on the user's behalf.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Help a user talk through whether to change jobs, stay, or change something in their current work, starting from uncertainty, distress, a vague sense of stagnation, an offer in hand, a counter-offer from the current employer, or pressure from family or colleagues. Clarify what matters, separate deadlines that order the next steps from the decision itself, compare conditional options, and agree on a small next step and a time to revisit it. Use when someone asks whether they should quit, wonders whether leaving is just running away, has second thoughts after receiving an offer or being asked to stay, feels stuck because others say it would be a waste, wants to leave soon after joining, or wants advice before deciding to start a job search; do not make the final stay-or-leave decision, evaluate offer terms, plan the resignation, or predict hiring outcomes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Debrief a finished Otameshi Tenshoku trial from the employer's side: set the observed facts against the completion criteria agreed before the start, keep expectations added afterwards, second-hand or off-the-job observations and the company's own late or missing support apart, settle the hours actually worked separately from any evaluation, and draft feedback to the candidate that states facts, support gaps and what happens next without promising a hire or continuation the company has not decided. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to review a trial, decide what to tell the candidate, or work out the settlement after a shortfall; do not use to judge the candidate's aptitude or predict a hire, to cut pay or demand unpaid rework because of dissatisfaction, to compare candidates, or to send the feedback, pay, or update records on the user's behalf.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Prepare the internal case for hosting an Otameshi Tenshoku trial: total what it costs the company with candidate pay, staff hours and platform or incidental fees kept apart, compare it with the budget, state what remains if no hire follows, and lay out the risks, stop conditions, decision owners and deadlines. Use when a hiring manager needs approval or budget from a decision maker, a recruiter has to explain the plan to the team that will host, or a small-business owner wants to see the full cost including their own time before posting; do not use to design the work (trial-work-design), to write the listing (trial-listing-draft), to predict whether a hire will follow, to state platform fees, agency fees or market rates from memory, or to submit the request or post the listing on the user's behalf.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Read a Japanese job posting closely and report what it actually states: base pay separated from fixed overtime allowance, the range converted to an hourly basis, required versus preferred requirements, and the terms left ambiguous. Use when a user wants a 求人票 or job description examined before applying, wants two postings compared on the same basis, or wants questions prepared about pay and working conditions; do not use to judge whether the user will be hired, to infer duties the posting does not state, or to evaluate the employer's reputation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Audit a browser fingerprint for internal contradictions with the liarjs CLI - canvas, WebGL, WebGL2, WebGPU, audio, 220 fonts, WebRTC and timezone probes, scored against the TLS/HTTP/ASN view of the same request. Use when asked to run a browser fingerprint test, see what a fingerprint looks like, check canvas or WebGL fingerprint stability, compare a spoofed profile against a real browser, or find out whether a browser profile is self-consistent.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Work on album artwork — reading an image's dimensions, and embedding a folder's cover file into the tags of its tracks. Use this whenever a task touches `services/artwork.py`, the cover half of `services/tags.py`, or `scripts/embed_covers.py` / `embed_covers_cron.sh`. Covers why Lyrion shows the embedded artwork and never the folder file, how covers are compared, why images are never re-encoded, and what embedding costs in rewritten files.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reads, queries, and writes bigWig indexed binary signal tracks (coverage, fold-change, conservation, methylation-rate) with pyBigWig (Python) and the UCSC Kent tools (bedGraphToBigWig, bigWigToBedGraph, bigWigInfo, bigWigSummary, bigWigAverageOverBed) and deepTools (multiBigwigSummary, computeMatrix, bigwigCompare). Covers the central trap that a wide query returns a precomputed zoom-level summary (by default the mean, which annihilates narrow peaks) not per-base data, when exact=True/values() is mandatory, the NaN-not-zero gap-handling fork, choosing mean vs max vs sum vs coverage by biological question, and the sorted-bedGraph plus chrom.sizes build requirement. Use when extracting signal at regions, computing mean signal per gene/peak, building a browser track from bedGraph, comparing tracks, or building TSS/gene-body metaprofiles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot with 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR scaling; MetaPlotR; deepTools `computeMatrix scale-regions`), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (bigWig of log2 IP/input via deepTools `bamCompare`; ggcoverage; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV / UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR stacked-bar feature-distribution summaries, and volcano / MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012 *Nature* 485:201; Meyer 2012 *Cell* 149:1635 — concurrent founding papers from different labs both showed this independently). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features for figure 1, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks on the peak set, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the Dominissini 2012 / Meyer 2012 stop-codon enrichment plot.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Compare gene co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to find rewired relationships using DiffCorr, DiffCoEx, DINGO/iDINGO, and CoDiNA. Covers the differential-connectivity-is-not-differential-expression distinction, the pairwise multiple-testing explosion, marginal vs partial (direct) rewiring, and the underpowered-rewiring failure mode. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment, or developmental stages, or finding hub genes that rewire without changing mean expression. For single-condition modules see coexpression-networks; for differential expression of means see differential-expression/de-results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Standardizes molecular structures using ChEMBL chembl_structure_pipeline and RDKit rdMolStandardize covering sanitization, salt/solvent stripping, neutralization, tautomer canonicalization, stereochemistry standardization, mixture handling, and isotope normalization. Explicitly compares ChEMBL pipeline, canSARchem, and PubChem standardization choices. Use when preparing libraries for QSAR training, joining datasets across sources, deduplicating compound collections, or building canonical compound registries.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violations introduced, violations fixed, and pre-existing count. Use `scan` for a full audit with no diffing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Edit EcoSIM PFT-parameter NetCDF files such as ecosim_pftpar_20260303.nc with the ParEditor class from applications/notebooks/scripts/ParamEditor.py. Use when asked to modify, scale, copy, compare, or delete PFT parameter records for a plant functional type (six-character pfts code such as gr3s43 or ndlf34), update microbe parameter NetCDF values, or maintain the JSONL change log that records past parameter changes. Never modify plant_trait.*.desc files; they are read-only references.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Extract study sites, observational variables, coordinates, climate-forcing sources, and cited data sources from ecosystem-modeling papers, PDFs, supplements, or article text, then plan or create EcoSIM simulation workflows and run folders for those sites. Use when Codex is asked to read a paper for EcoSIM feasibility, including requests phrased as "read paper for ecosim feasibility"; read a paper for sites/data availability; reproduce a published site simulation in EcoSIM; compare EcoSIM outputs to paper observations; or convert paper-derived AmeriFlux, FLUXNET, US NLDAS-domain, non-US ERA5, crop, peatland, forest, grassland, wetland, or unmanaged field-site information into EcoSIM inputs and runnable cases.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Convert AmeriFlux ERA5 half-hourly meteorological CSV files into EcoSIM hourly climate forcing NetCDF files, compare generated forcing against overlapping measured tower meteorology when a FULLSET file is available, and report large biases or errors. Use when preparing or validating EcoSIM climate inputs for AmeriFlux sites, checking ERA5 against in situ records, diagnosing forcing discrepancies, or writing climate-quality reports. For non-AmeriFlux paper sites that need a fresh Copernicus CDS ERA5 point download by longitude/latitude, use era5-cds-point-download first.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.