68 skills · sorted by relevance
Create evaluation drafts for existing skills using actual conversations and user corrections. Produce criteria and repeatable test cases, distinguish evidence from specification assumptions, and prepare an anonymized draft for human review.
Expert guide for MCP client sampling (sampling/createMessage), Critic-in-the-Loop agentic quality gates, autonomous human-in-the-loop emulation, and multi-model consensus verification / Panduan ahli sampling MCP client, quality gate agen Critic-in-the-Loop, dan verifikasi konsensus multi-model.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Expert guide for speculative multi-agent drafting, parallel hypothesis generation, AST-aware consensus arbitration, and multi-model code reconciliation / Panduan ahli penyusunan draf multi-agen spekulatif, generasi hipotesis paralel, arbitrase konsensus sadar-AST, dan rekonsiliasi kode multi-model.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Role-based multi-model strategy. The model catalog lives in a local configuration file instead of the skill text -- roles (thinker/decision-maker, long-running worker, draft generator, reviewer/acceptance, escalation), reasoning effort as an independent axis, mandatory review for draft models, provider switching for independent reviews, budgets, delegation flow, and cost/quality of small workers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Rollenbasierte Multi-Modell-Strategie. Modellkatalog liegt in einer lokalen Konfigurationsdatei statt im Skill-Text -- Rollen (Denker/Entscheider, Dauer-Worker, Entwurfsgenerator, Reviewer/Abnahme, Eskalation), Reasoning-Effort als eigene Achse, Abnahmepflicht für Entwurfsmodelle, Anbieterwechsel für unabhängige Reviews, Kontingente, Delegationsablauf und Kosten/Qualität kleiner Worker.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Expert Aider (AI pair programming, git integration, multi-model, architecture)
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Delegate coding tasks to Blackbox AI CLI agent. Multi-model agent with built-in judge that runs tasks through multiple LLMs and picks the best result. Requires the blackbox CLI and a Blackbox AI API key.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Add one optional Codex critique to a decision draft produced by council. With explicit consent to send the draft to OpenAI, examine weak conclusions, missing failure scenarios, and overlooked dissent before the user makes the final decision.
Delegate implementation, bug fixes, and pull request reviews to Blackbox AI through the Hermes terminal. Run tasks across multiple AI models, evaluate their outputs, monitor longer jobs, and resume work from saved checkpoints.
Build Java applications that store, query, update, and delete data in Azure Cosmos DB. Covers synchronous and asynchronous clients, partition keys for distributing data, consistency settings, request usage, and error handling.
Guides Python agent development with PydanticAI, covering tool calls and structured outputs checked against defined data types. Explains service injection, provider switching, streaming responses, and tests that run without calling a real language model.
Audit instructions and memory files loaded on every agent turn. Identify repeated rules, contradictions, outdated content, and material better moved into skills, then receive evidence-backed recommendations ranked by estimated token savings and change risk.
Review board memos and strategy briefs with available Claude, Codex, and Gemini models. Compare concerns, supporting arguments, and votes, then turn disagreements into questions to resolve before committing to a major business decision.
Verify finished work against acceptance criteria using executable checks and a review of whether each requirement is met. Multiple models can review uncertain cases, and rejected work can enter an automated repair loop when the required Seed is available.
Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create Pydantic models following the multi-model pattern with Base, Create, Update, Response, and InDB variants. Use when defining API request/response schemas, database models, or data validation in Python applications using Pydantic v2.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Azure Cosmos DB SDK for Java. NoSQL database operations with global distribution, multi-model support, and reactive patterns. Triggers: "CosmosClient java", "CosmosAsyncClient", "cosmos database java", "cosmosdb java", "document database java".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Implement Claude API reference architectures for common use cases. Use when designing a Claude-powered application, choosing between direct API vs queue-based, or planning a multi-model architecture. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic architecture", "claude system design", "anthropic reference architecture", "design claude integration".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Integrate Core ML models in iOS apps for on-device machine learning inference. Covers model loading (.mlmodel, .mlpackage, .mlmodelc), predictions with auto-generated classes and MLFeatureProvider, compute unit configuration (CPU, GPU, Neural Engine), MLTensor, VNCoreMLRequest, MLComputePlan, multi-model pipelines, and deployment strategies. Use when loading Core ML models, making predictions, configuring compute units, or profiling model performance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Direct, generate, edit, compare, and review visual assets with current Google Gemini image models. Use for image creation, image editing, reference-based consistency, product and character visuals, text-bearing graphics, grounded diagrams, video-derived images, and multi-model image portfolios.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
LLM and ML model deployment for inference. Use when serving models in production, building AI APIs, or optimizing inference. Covers vLLM (LLM serving), TensorRT-LLM (GPU optimization), Ollama (local), BentoML (ML deployment), Triton (multi-model), LangChain (orchestration), LlamaIndex (RAG), and streaming patterns.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.