244 skills · sorted by relevance
Turn a research report and experiment results into an English paper with figures, LaTeX source, and a compiled PDF. Coordinate planning, drafting, Gemini reviews, and two revision rounds, preserving PDFs and an improvement log.
Prepare Paperclip changes for a pull request by organizing commits, updating the branch, writing the description, addressing automated review feedback, and checking tests and CI before reporting the result for handoff.
Plan systems conference papers with section page budgets, paragraph outlines, and writing patterns. Organize design choices, experimental evidence, and related work into a clear argument, then review the draft with submission checklists.
Turns research reports and experimental results into a paper through outline planning, figure creation, LaTeX drafting, PDF compilation, and review. Produces editable source files and a compiled PDF, with checks connecting claims to evidence.
Build a section-by-section paper outline from experiment results and review findings. Map claims to evidence, allocate pages for the target venue, and plan figures and citations in PAPER_PLAN.md before drafting the paper.
Turn research code and experimental results into ML and AI paper drafts. Clarify the main contribution, connect claims to evidence, find and verify references, and prepare conference submissions using LaTeX templates and review checklists.
Turn research code and experimental results into ML and AI paper drafts. The skill guides paper structure, related work searches, citation verification, and conference formatting with LaTeX, a document preparation system used for academic papers.
Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan a 10–12 page systems research paper for conferences such as OSDI and SOSP. Get section page budgets, paragraph roles, and writing patterns that connect the research problem, design decisions, and evaluation evidence.
Build a paper outline from experiment results and review conclusions. Map claims to evidence, plan sections, figures, and citations, and allocate pages for the target venue, with another model reviewing the outline before it is finalized.
Write or revise a Paperclip plan that states the intended outcome, constraints, approach, and success checks. Capture unresolved decisions, maintain the saved plan, and request approval when the work requires it.
Coordinate a research project from topic exploration to a final manuscript. The skill connects research, writing, integrity checks, review, and revision workflows, tracks deliverables, and records progress with user confirmation at stage boundaries.
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan, draft, and revise academic papers with support for literature reviews, bilingual abstracts, citation checks, and responses to reviewers. The skill also formats manuscripts for publication requirements and produces Markdown, LaTeX, DOCX, or PDF outputs.
Turn research code and experimental results into ML and AI paper drafts. The skill guides argument structure, reference verification, and conference formatting with LaTeX templates, helping researchers revise drafts and prepare submissions.
Review academic papers before submission by checking structure, logic, citations, figures, and writing clarity. Audit major claims against available evidence, identify overstatement or missing support, and suggest whether each claim should be kept, softened, revised, or removed.
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric results, and formats them as PaperOrchestra-ready inputs (idea.md + experimental_log.md). TRIGGER when the user says "aggregate my agent logs for paper writing", "extract experiments from my coding agent history", "prepare PaperOrchestra inputs from my cache", "turn my agent logs into a paper", mentions a folder or directory they want to use as the basis for a paper, or wants to run PaperOrchestra but only has scattered agent experiment histories rather than structured inputs. Run this BEFORE paper-orchestra. Also called automatically by paper-orchestra when workspace/inputs/idea.md or workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md are missing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
EZMM writer-stage adapter for the vendored PaperOrchestra skill pack. Use by default during pipeline/04-paper-writing for outline-first paper drafting, literature-review planning, section writing, and refinement discipline. The adapter maps EZMM runtime artifacts to PaperOrchestra-style inputs, runs PaperOrchestra-first writing automatically, and returns EZMM-compatible paper.md.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Improve a compiled LaTeX paper through two rounds of Claude review, edits, and recompilation. The workflow addresses inconsistent reasoning, unsupported claims, unclear writing, and visual presentation, while keeping a cumulative log of changes.