50 skills · sorted by relevance
Explore research directions through ten structured thinking frameworks, then rank ideas by their importance, clarity, and feasibility. Turn a vague interest into a focused proposal with a short explanation, candidate experiments, and an initial feasibility study.
Turn a research interest into a defined question and practical plan. Use structured brainstorming, literature review, gap analysis, and method comparison to produce a research proposal, organized review, and references, with Zotero support for paper management.
Explore computer science and AI research directions using eight creativity frameworks. Combine ideas across fields, question hidden assumptions, and transfer mechanisms from other disciplines to develop research questions with testable predictions.
Develop a vague research interest into a specific question and plan. Use 5W1H prompts, literature reviews, and analysis of unanswered questions to define hypotheses, required evidence, suitable methods, and a concrete next step.
Choose research problems, refine new ideas, or rethink stalled projects through structured conversation. Assess feasibility, potential impact, and risks, then develop success criteria, decision points, and backup plans for a clearer research strategy.
Research ideation workflow from literature search to research planning. Triggers on "brainstorm research ideas", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", "research ideation".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions. Use when exploring new problem spaces, pivoting between projects, or seeking novel angles on existing work.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generate 15–20 research directions from a question, topic, or data opportunity, then narrow them to 5–7 candidates. Receive ranked ideas with feasibility assessments, key risks, confidence scores, and reasons for rejecting the others.
Explore research ideas through conversation, question assumptions, and connect approaches from different fields. Develop a broad set of possibilities, then assess promising directions and outline next steps such as pilot experiments or literature searches.
Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants to find information sources for content ideation, competitor monitoring, or industry tracking. Also use when the user mentions "research sources," "information sources," "content ideation," "industry monitoring," "competitor monitoring," "market intelligence," "content research," or "topic research." For keywords, use keyword-research.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Develop and prioritize early research ideas through independent brainstorming, structured discussion, evidence checks, and critical review. Keep assumptions, uncertainty, dissent, and scoring reasons visible, then record the human decision and appropriate next steps.
Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Full-spectrum product research pipeline. Runs competitive analysis, technology trend scouting, user feedback analysis, and feature ideation. Trigger on: research, competitive research, market research, feature discovery, what should we build next, technology trends, user feedback, app store reviews, GitHub issues analysis, competitive landscape, product strategy.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Full-spectrum product research pipeline. Runs competitive analysis, technology trend scouting, user feedback analysis, and feature ideation. Triggers: on: research, competitive research, market research, feature discovery, what should we build next.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Organize papers from Zotero into an Obsidian project knowledge base. The skill separates source notes, research synthesis, and writing outputs, requiring evidence records and source links before findings become claims used in later work.
Explore a development idea through probing questions before committing to a plan. The skill can initiate research when needed and route the resulting ideas into GSD notes, tasks, research questions, requirements, or development phases.
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Use when user says "give me research ideas on X", "brainstorm questions about Y", "what could I study with this data?", "I'm looking for a paper idea on...", "generate hypotheses for...". One-shot generation, not multi-turn. For idea-refinement use `/interview-me`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Interactive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ, hypotheses, identification, data needs, empirical strategy). Use when user says "interview me", "help me think through this idea", "I have a half-baked idea", "formalize this into a project", "walk me through framing a study". Multi-turn Q&A; saves spec to disk. NOT for lit review (`/lit-review`) or ideation from scratch (`/research-ideation`).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Search academic literature and generate research hypotheses
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Research, expand, and cluster keywords for content strategy. Use when planning content topics, building keyword lists, expanding seed keywords, clustering by topic and intent, or mapping keywords to funnel stages. Triggers on "keyword research," "keyword expansion," "keyword clustering," "content topics," "what to write about," "topic ideation," "content planning," "6 circles method," "seed keywords," "keyword difficulty," "search volume," "intent mapping," "pillar content strategy," or "content calendar planning." For SEO optimization and auditing, see seo-and-aeo-strategy.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.