10 skills · sorted by relevance
Combine capabilities from multiple fine-tuned LLMs without retraining using mergekit. Choose a merging method, configure how models are blended, and evaluate the resulting model on tasks such as math, code generation, and conversation.
Combine specialized language models without retraining using mergekit. The skill explains how to choose merging methods, configure each model’s contribution, compare resulting variants, and prepare a merged model for evaluation and deployment.
Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use SymPy to simplify expressions, solve equations, and calculate derivatives, integrals, and matrices with exact symbolic results. Specify assumptions, verify solutions, and turn mathematical expressions into numerical functions, source code, or LaTeX output.
Create, edit, and inspect spreadsheets for reusable budgets, models, and trackers. Check formulas and dependent totals, preserve unrelated data, and deliver an editable workbook or a link to the updated native spreadsheet.
Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Think and work like an expert Algorithms Researcher. Use when a task calls for Algorithms Researcher judgment. Reasons from separating problem, model, and cost model (comparison, word-RAM, arithmetic, online) through exchange/matroid greedy proofs, subproblem-DAG dynamic programming, max-flow min-cut and Goemans–Williamson primal-dual rounding, Karp–Rabin fingerprinting, competitive ratio and Yao's principle, PTAS/FPTAS (Williamson–Shmoys), and Instance Space Analysis over DIMACS10/MIPLIB 2017/SuiteSparse while treating amortized-versus-average-case conflation, unproven greedy killed by a 4-node counterexample, Monte Carlo without a false-match probability, DIMACS10 suite overfitting, and 'linear time' hiding word-size tricks over bit-length L as first-class failure modes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Chemistry Teacher — grading a lab report where the numeric result misses the "expected" value but the methodology is sound, distinguishing a conceptual misunderstanding from an arithmetic slip on a problem set, deciding how much procedural freedom to give students on an open-ended lab, or vetting whether a demo/lab procedure is safe to run in this specific room.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.