Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

agent-harness-construction

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

OriginalShow the original description

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

See how to install

Good for

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
  • Evaluate completion rates, retries, and task costs

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Agent Harness Construction

Use this skill when you are improving how an agent plans, calls tools, recovers from errors, and converges on completion.

Core Model

Agent output quality is constrained by:

  1. Action space quality
  2. Observation quality
  3. Recovery quality
  4. Context budget quality

Action Space Design

  1. Use stable, explicit tool names.
  2. Keep inputs schema-first and narrow.
  3. Return deterministic output shapes.
  4. Avoid catch-all tools unless isolation is impossible.

Granularity Rules

  • Use micro-tools for high-risk operations (deploy, migration, permissions).
  • Use medium tools for common edit/read/search loops.
  • Use macro-tools only when round-trip overhead is the dominant cost.

Observation Design

Every tool response should include:

  • status: success|warning|error
  • summary: one-line result
  • next_actions: actionable follow-ups
  • artifacts: file paths / IDs

Error Recovery Contract

For every error path, include:

  • root cause hint
  • safe retry instruction
  • explicit stop condition

Context Budgeting

  1. Keep system prompt minimal and invariant.
  2. Move large guidance into skills loaded on demand.
  3. Prefer references to files over inlining long documents.
  4. Compact at phase boundaries, not arbitrary token thresholds.

Architecture Pattern Guidance

  • ReAct: best for exploratory tasks with uncertain path.
  • Function-calling: best for structured deterministic flows.
  • Hybrid (recommended): ReAct planning + typed tool execution.

Benchmarking

Track:

  • completion rate
  • retries per task
  • pass@1 and pass@3
  • cost per successful task

Anti-Patterns

  • Too many tools with overlapping semantics.
  • Opaque tool output with no recovery hints.
  • Error-only output without next steps.
  • Context overloading with irrelevant references.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummary

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Integrate x402, an HTTP payment protocol, so agents can pay for APIs or services. Configure task and session budgets, approved recipients, and wallets with privately managed keys, using integration paths for Base, X Layer, or Solana.

  • Enable an agent to pay for a paid API
  • Set task and session spending limits
  • Restrict payment recipients, networks, and assets
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill