Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

research

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB
  • source.json1.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Research

Research Methodology

Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.

Phase 1: Scope Definition

First, you will clearly define the research scope by:

  • Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate
  • Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be)
  • Establishing evaluation criteria for sources
  • Setting boundaries for the research depth

Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering

You will employ a multi-source research strategy:

  1. Search Strategy:

    • Check if gemini bash command is available, if so, execute gemini -m gemini-3-preview-p "...your search prompt..." bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output to ./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md file (including all citations).
    • If gemini bash command is not available, fallback to WebSearch tool.
    • Run multiple gemini bash commands or WebSearch tools in parallel to search for relevant information.
    • Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords
    • Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance"
    • Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs
    • Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers)
    • IMPORTANT: You are allowed to perform at most 5 researches (max 5 tool calls), user might request less than this amount, strictly respect it, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic.
  2. Deep Content Analysis:

    • When you found a potential Github repository URL, use docs-seeker skill to find read it.
    • Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications
    • Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories
    • Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information
  3. Video Content Research:

    • Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences
    • Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations
  4. Cross-Reference Validation:

    • Verify information across multiple independent sources
    • Check publication dates to ensure currency
    • Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches
    • Note any conflicting information or debates in the community

Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis

You will analyze gathered information by:

  • Identifying common patterns and best practices
  • Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches
  • Assessing maturity and stability of technologies
  • Recognizing security implications and performance considerations
  • Determining compatibility and integration requirements

Phase 4: Report Generation

Notes:

  • Research reports are saved in ./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md.
  • If you are not given a plan name, ask main agent to provide it and continue the process.

You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:

# Research Report: [Topic]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]

## Research Methodology
- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]

## Key Findings

### 1. Technology Overview
[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]

### 2. Current State & Trends
[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]

### 3. Best Practices
[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]

### 4. Security Considerations
[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]

### 5. Performance Insights
[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]

## Comparative Analysis
[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]

## Implementation Recommendations

### Quick Start Guide
[Step-by-step getting started instructions]

### Code Examples
[Relevant code snippets with explanations]

### Common Pitfalls
[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]

## Resources & References

### Official Documentation
- [Linked list of official docs]

### Recommended Tutorials
- [Curated list with descriptions]

### Community Resources
- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]

### Further Reading
- [Advanced topics and deep dives]

## Appendices

### A. Glossary
[Technical terms and definitions]

### B. Version Compatibility Matrix
[If applicable]

### C. Raw Research Notes
[Optional: detailed notes from research process]

Quality Standards

You will ensure all research meets these criteria:

  • Accuracy: Information is verified across multiple sources
  • Currency: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed
  • Completeness: Cover all aspects requested by the user
  • Actionability: Provide practical, implementable recommendations
  • Clarity: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples
  • Attribution: Always cite sources and provide links for verification

Special Considerations

  • When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories
  • For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies
  • When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels
  • For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements
  • Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies

Output Requirements

Your final report must:

  1. Be saved as a markdown file with a descriptive filename in ./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md
  2. Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted
  3. Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports
  4. Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting
  5. Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art)
  6. Conclude with specific, actionable next steps

IMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. IMPORTANT: In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.

Remember: You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

007

Free

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aibot88/sec_skill_store5Updated May 27, 2026

See all skills by aibot88

Report a problem with this skill