Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

regulatory-submission

Organize FDA or EMA regulatory submission materials into CTD Modules 1–5. Draft Module 2 summaries, check data integrity and ICH guideline alignment, identify gaps, and prepare dossier components such as cover letters and checklists.

OriginalShow the original description

Prepare FDA/EMA regulatory submissions (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA) in CTD format. Generate module outlines (Modules 1-5), run ICH compliance checks (ALCOA+, E6 GCP, Q1-Q12), verify data integrity, and produce submission-ready dossiers with cover letters and checklists.

Works withGoogle Cloud

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • FDA・EMA申請のCTD構成を整理したいとき
  • 申請資料の不足項目を洗い出したいとき
  • ICH指針とデータ完全性を点検したいとき
  • 申請書類の表紙文書やチェックリストを準備したいとき

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • eval_report_regulatory-submission_result.json6.3 KB
  • POLISH_CHANGELOG.md666 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Regulatory Submission — FDA/EMA Dossier Structure

When to Use

  • Preparing FDA/EMA regulatory submissions (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA)
  • The user mentions regulatory submission, FDA, EMA, IND, NDA, BLA, CTD, dossier, or regulatory affairs
  • Generating CTD module outlines and compliance checks for dossier assembly

Workflow

  1. Identify submission type — Input: product type, development stage, market (US/EU) → Output: submission type (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA)
  2. Generate CTD outline — Map to Modules 1-5 with required sections → Output: CTD table of contents
  3. Populate Module 2 — Draft Quality Overall Summary, Nonclinical/Clinical Overviews → Output: Module 2 drafts
  4. Verify data integrity — Check ALCOA+ compliance across all modules → Output: integrity audit report
  5. Run compliance check — Verify against ICH guidelines (E6 GCP, Q1-Q12) → ⛔ Checkpoint: Review gaps with user, prioritize remediation → Output: compliance gap list
  6. Finalize dossier — Compile modules, generate cover letters, verify cross-references → Output: submission-ready package

If Data Incomplete

  • Missing CTD sections → generate "[DATA REQUIRED]" placeholders with expected data sources
  • ICH compliance gaps → classify critical/major/minor with remediation timeline
  • Product type ambiguous → ask user to clarify drug vs. biologic vs. device

Submission Types

FDA

TypePurposeKey Sections
INDInvestigational New DrugChemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, clinical protocol
NDANew Drug ApplicationFull CMC, nonclinical, clinical data
BLABiologics LicenseManufacturing, characterization, clinical
510(k)Device clearanceSubstantial equivalence, performance testing
PMADevice approvalClinical data, manufacturing

EMA: CTA | MAA | Scientific Advice

CTD Format

  • Module 1: Administrative (cover letters, forms, labeling)
  • Module 2: Summaries (quality, nonclinical, clinical overviews)
  • Module 3: Quality/CMC (drug substance, product, manufacturing)
  • Module 4: Nonclinical (pharmacology, PK, toxicology)
  • Module 5: Clinical (study reports, literature)

Key Principles

  • Follow ICH guidelines (E6 GCP, Q1-Q12)
  • Data integrity: ALCOA+ (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate)
  • Risk-based approach: prioritize critical quality attributes

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If execution fails, report the failure point, summarize what can still be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of regulatory-submission and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

regulatory-submission only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

abstract-trimmer

FreeSummary

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Creates three to five concise English Highlights for journal submission from manuscript text or supported files. It adapts bullets to the article type, keeps each within 85 characters, and grounds every claim in the supplied source without inventing results.

  • Draft journal Highlights from an abstract or manuscript
  • Summarize a meta-analysis or review for submission
  • Extract key findings from a supported PDF or DOCX
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills2KUpdated Sep 17, 2026

See all skills by aipoch

Report a problem with this skill